Katie Riley
@ktriley.bsky.social
Head of Data and Graphics at The Observer. Used to work at 🐢, WSJ, FT, Atlantic. Illinoisan. Londoner. Sleepy. [Email me: [email protected]]
Tell me what other part I need to play, Prime Minister.
October 21, 2025 at 1:51 PM
Tell me what other part I need to play, Prime Minister.
Reposted by Katie Riley
If Labour cannot denounce mass deportation of permanent residents, Idi Amin style, what is the point of them?
October 20, 2025 at 8:21 PM
If Labour cannot denounce mass deportation of permanent residents, Idi Amin style, what is the point of them?
Lazy freeloading international students, though, am I right?
October 15, 2025 at 7:39 AM
Lazy freeloading international students, though, am I right?
This line in particular feels like it speaks to a lot of the current reporting on the government's adoption of "AI" in the UK
September 2, 2025 at 1:24 PM
This line in particular feels like it speaks to a lot of the current reporting on the government's adoption of "AI" in the UK
If you also care(!), you can find our investigation into the House of Lords here: observer.co.uk/data/peer-re...
Peer Review | The Observer
A visual guide to one of the world’s largest unelected chambers'
observer.co.uk
August 13, 2025 at 12:35 PM
If you also care(!), you can find our investigation into the House of Lords here: observer.co.uk/data/peer-re...
Maybe the definition of "a reasonable member of the public" has changed.
Or maybe, just maybe, they thought no one would care. And even if someone did care (I care!), guess what?) Maybe they also knew that it didn't matter because – ultimately – the Lords don't have to answer to the British public.
Or maybe, just maybe, they thought no one would care. And even if someone did care (I care!), guess what?) Maybe they also knew that it didn't matter because – ultimately – the Lords don't have to answer to the British public.
August 13, 2025 at 12:33 PM
Maybe the definition of "a reasonable member of the public" has changed.
Or maybe, just maybe, they thought no one would care. And even if someone did care (I care!), guess what?) Maybe they also knew that it didn't matter because – ultimately – the Lords don't have to answer to the British public.
Or maybe, just maybe, they thought no one would care. And even if someone did care (I care!), guess what?) Maybe they also knew that it didn't matter because – ultimately – the Lords don't have to answer to the British public.
Here's how the Code of Conduct defines "relevant"
August 13, 2025 at 12:33 PM
Here's how the Code of Conduct defines "relevant"