Lindsay S. Shaffer
@lindsayshaffer.bsky.social
92 followers 39 following 150 posts
postdoc fellow at NIH NIDA investigating inference-based decision making and olfactory functioning. EEG & RewP aficionado currently dabbling with MRI.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
lindsayshaffer.bsky.social
who needs a diploma when you can have a belt instead??

anyways, i have a phd now and i'll have a baby boy in 9 weeks
lindsayshaffer.bsky.social
which one of you drew these cute EEG onion people
Reposted by Lindsay S. Shaffer
prashanthi-ravi.bsky.social
(3/10) Additionally, we show that human NAc organization is not simply divided into “core” and “shell,” but instead reflects continuous spatial gradients of MSN subtypes linked to genetic risk for psychiatric and addiction-related traits.
lindsayshaffer.bsky.social
Could you clarify what are the usage metrics for Google Scholar (ie number of users)? My understanding is declining usage led to Google Reader getting axed. If academic institutions and libraries are using Google Scholar, then wouldn’t having increased utility be protective here?
lindsayshaffer.bsky.social
who needs a diploma when you can have a belt instead??

anyways, i have a phd now and i'll have a baby boy in 9 weeks
Reposted by Lindsay S. Shaffer
lindsayshaffer.bsky.social
Excited to announce that, starting in late August, I’ll be joining Thorsten Kahnt’s lab at the NIDA IRP as a IRTA postdoc! My postdoc research will focus on olfactory functioning and inference-based decision-making in people with HIV and SUD! 😁😁Happy for this next stage after graduating this summer!
Reposted by Lindsay S. Shaffer
klobstar.bsky.social
every day online I am forced to see the dumbest people
lindsayshaffer.bsky.social
read broadly.
publish deeply.
lindsayshaffer.bsky.social
Martin, if you need Tokyo recs, know I’m happy to provide. I went to Japan for 3 weeks for my honeymoon with 5 days in Tokyo alone. My husband and I went all over the country and got to see a lot.
lindsayshaffer.bsky.social
expected wood & unexpected safes and vice versa!
lindsayshaffer.bsky.social
such as this paper be one way of examining task-irrelevant rewards? suppose participants rate which object is the most useful/valuable for lighting a fire or anchoring a boat and then complete a task where the goal shifts from lighting a fire > boat anchoring > etc. trials could also have
How usefulness shapes neural representations during goal-directed behavior
The activity of the human prefrontal cortex automatically encodes the usefulness of an item according to the current goal.
www.science.org
lindsayshaffer.bsky.social
altogether without examining how RewP varies within paradigms that were the impetus of conceptualizing RPE. that's not to say Pavlovian is the only answer, just that Pav can bring much needed clarification to the current discussion.

btw regarding q's from section 4.1: could a similar task
lindsayshaffer.bsky.social
i get that. i do think alot of RL work dominating EEG involves instrumental conditioning, action selection, S-R association-like tasks, etc. it's a little curious bc RPE came from rescorla-wagner, which developed initially as a model of Pavlovian conditioning. IMO it's difficult to rule out RL
lindsayshaffer.bsky.social
reflects a cog expectation of the reward, so the CR of ♦️might manifest differently than resp to 🍇.

Also surely a response toward S-Rs (e.g., ♦️-> press 👈 -> 🍇==😀) would differ from a response toward S-Os (♦️ 👀 -> 🍇==😀 ) since the representations underlying each assoc structure are different? 😉
lindsayshaffer.bsky.social
that since you're referring to the Baker 2009 and Holroyd 2011 papers, you're saying ♦️ -> 100% 🍇 thus ♦️ = 🍇 despite ♦️ presented for 50% of the entire expt, correct? Then is it a q of what extent the RewP reflects a conditioned response (♦️) vs unconditioned response (🍇)? I assume a Pavlovian CR
lindsayshaffer.bsky.social
ooo, see I had something else in mind! When I saw "cue has its own value", it made me wonder if you were alluding to sign-tracking vs goal-tracking of cues since sign-tracking shows how cues develop value independent of the outcome it predicts (which I'm not sure has been done w/RewP?). But I see
Reposted by Lindsay S. Shaffer
jimfcav.bsky.social
Big news. After 48 drafts, Clay Holroyd and I are excited to present a narrative review and new theoretical summary on our favorite sensitive & specific EEG marker of reward receipt - the Reward Positivity: tinyurl.com/yzy98rur
lindsayshaffer.bsky.social
No surprise I read this excellent write-up immediately. Q: when saying the cue itself becomes the new goal, are you suggesting the possibility that the cue obtains value independent of the outcome it predicts? Or something else?
lindsayshaffer.bsky.social
I didn’t know you had a kid, congrats!!! 😊😊