lol feels like the right term is just "sack" and they could just attribute it to the player that actually caused the outcome and not just the player who was in closest proximity to where he went out of bounds

I always thought we were tolerating the movies because of how much we love the other stuff

Harlan really is the GOAT. Makes me so happy whenever I see he'll be calling a game

"The AI George Washington is trained on the full transcript of Glenn Beck's daily shows over the last 20 years, and nothing else. Because we know he would have been a big fan of Glenn"

My god I would LOVE to see the prompt and data set he built this with

Actors entire job is to internalize and embody the feelings, experiences, and emotions of another person. But for some reason when it's about guy who greenlit some projects for them, they become incapable of seeing past their own individual experience

David Ellison:

Still too low

Incredible quote to add flavor to the stat.

"The model I invented to confirm my opinion that teams should go for it more on 4th down says they should go for it on 4th down there"

that doesn't look like a "clear go" it looks like a "technically you should actually go for it there" whereas actually, they should have punted because duh

This is why I'm against tanking/playing for draft position.

Being bad, even really bad, doesn't guarantee you anything, at a certain point you're just losing intentionally because you are a loser.

Thought it’d be a pick six but I ain’t complainin. I’m on a roll today