No way is this four portions….

Any way I’m off to eat for four people. 😂

Always tell yourself: growth happens during rest. Gym: activation. Rest: growth.

Governments can pick this privacy-first system, one that genuinely protects children, or they can keep surveillance rules that demand ID checks, message scanning, and giant data logs.

They can’t have both.

Why it’s safe
• Children can’t fake the age stamp.
• Hackers have nothing useful to steal; there is no big database.
• End-to-end encryption stays untouched.
• No company or government sees where you go online.

What stays private
• Your name
• Your full date of birth
• Your address
• Any copy of your ID
• Your browsing history
• Your private messages

How it could be set up
1. A trusted body issues a digital age credential to your phone after a one-time ID check.
2. When a site asks for proof, your phone key code answer.
3. The site sees only that answer. It does not see your name, date of birth, address, or any ID images

The child protection is a smoke screen for what the rest of the act contains. You are even using fallacious arguments and suggest a direct connection between adults giving their ID and protecting a child.

They’re the biggest restriction in liberty and privacy ever.

And done. Now to EAT.

It’s bicep and triceps night tonight once I’ve done soldering lolzzzz

Agreeeeeeeeed