Lucija Batinovic
@metahag.bsky.social
Meta-science | Open Science | PhD student | Disability Research | Editorial Assistant @ Meta-Psychology | https://elucidatescience.netlify.app
Glad to see Elsevier is investing in important things like suggesting readers that AI reads the articles for them. Nothing screams quality like claiming reading their articles is wasted time
November 6, 2025 at 10:15 AM
Glad to see Elsevier is investing in important things like suggesting readers that AI reads the articles for them. Nothing screams quality like claiming reading their articles is wasted time
Reposted by Lucija Batinovic
I fucking love buying books.
October 10, 2025 at 7:49 PM
I fucking love buying books.
Reposted by Lucija Batinovic
Hi #openscience friends! As Psych-DS moves forward (stay tuned for an R package update...), we're applying in parallel for renewal of the NIH grant that funds this work.
If you (a) have NIH funding and (b) plan or would like to use Psych-DS for resulting datasets, please drop me a line!
If you (a) have NIH funding and (b) plan or would like to use Psych-DS for resulting datasets, please drop me a line!
October 10, 2025 at 4:54 PM
Hi #openscience friends! As Psych-DS moves forward (stay tuned for an R package update...), we're applying in parallel for renewal of the NIH grant that funds this work.
If you (a) have NIH funding and (b) plan or would like to use Psych-DS for resulting datasets, please drop me a line!
If you (a) have NIH funding and (b) plan or would like to use Psych-DS for resulting datasets, please drop me a line!
Reposted by Lucija Batinovic
ReplicationResearch.org is now open for submissions!
Submit replications and reproductions from many different fields, as well as conceptual contributions. With diamond OA, open and citable peer review reports, and reproducibility checks, we push the boundaries of open and fair publishing.
Submit replications and reproductions from many different fields, as well as conceptual contributions. With diamond OA, open and citable peer review reports, and reproducibility checks, we push the boundaries of open and fair publishing.
October 10, 2025 at 6:12 AM
ReplicationResearch.org is now open for submissions!
Submit replications and reproductions from many different fields, as well as conceptual contributions. With diamond OA, open and citable peer review reports, and reproducibility checks, we push the boundaries of open and fair publishing.
Submit replications and reproductions from many different fields, as well as conceptual contributions. With diamond OA, open and citable peer review reports, and reproducibility checks, we push the boundaries of open and fair publishing.
Putting high hopes in this one. Happy birthday to me 🥳
October 7, 2025 at 7:12 AM
Putting high hopes in this one. Happy birthday to me 🥳
New post: connecting meta-analysis concepts with the GRADE framework for assessing certainty of evidence. elucidatescience.netlify.app/posts/ma-gra...
GRADE your meta-analysis – eLucidate science
An introduction to meta-analysis, following the GRADE assessment domains for evaluation
elucidatescience.netlify.app
September 30, 2025 at 1:38 PM
New post: connecting meta-analysis concepts with the GRADE framework for assessing certainty of evidence. elucidatescience.netlify.app/posts/ma-gra...
Is anyone else getting this error or am I missing something: Error: 'se' is not an exported object from 'namespace:metafor'?
#rstats @wviechtb.bsky.social
#rstats @wviechtb.bsky.social
September 12, 2025 at 4:50 PM
Is anyone else getting this error or am I missing something: Error: 'se' is not an exported object from 'namespace:metafor'?
#rstats @wviechtb.bsky.social
#rstats @wviechtb.bsky.social
Reposted by Lucija Batinovic
www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1...
INSPECT-SR: A tool for assessing trustworthiness of randomised controlled trials.
INSPECT-SR: A tool for assessing trustworthiness of randomised controlled trials.
INSPECT-SR: a tool for assessing trustworthiness of randomised controlled trials
The integrity of evidence synthesis is threatened by problematic randomised controlled trials (RCTs). These are RCTs where there are serious concerns about the trustworthiness of the data or findings....
www.medrxiv.org
September 5, 2025 at 6:11 PM
www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1...
INSPECT-SR: A tool for assessing trustworthiness of randomised controlled trials.
INSPECT-SR: A tool for assessing trustworthiness of randomised controlled trials.
Reposted by Lucija Batinovic
Yet another example of original authors being allowed to say anything they want in replies to critiques unconstrained by verifiable facts.
Reply states we didn’t consider things we explicitly did, and says the original article never said things it explicitly did.
Read Jamie’s thread for details:
Reply states we didn’t consider things we explicitly did, and says the original article never said things it explicitly did.
Read Jamie’s thread for details:
This has now been published in PNAS!
www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
The original authors also posted a reply:
www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
Quick thread on some additional thoughts and then I'm probably done talking about this one 🧵
www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
The original authors also posted a reply:
www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
Quick thread on some additional thoughts and then I'm probably done talking about this one 🧵
August 27, 2025 at 6:41 PM
Yet another example of original authors being allowed to say anything they want in replies to critiques unconstrained by verifiable facts.
Reply states we didn’t consider things we explicitly did, and says the original article never said things it explicitly did.
Read Jamie’s thread for details:
Reply states we didn’t consider things we explicitly did, and says the original article never said things it explicitly did.
Read Jamie’s thread for details:
Reposted by Lucija Batinovic
I wrote an R package that creates standardized R project structures that are compliant with @mekline.bsky.social's psych-DS...ish.
It also creates additional features for reproducibility and teaching like a readme, license, .gitignore and Quarto templates
+ can validate existing projects
It also creates additional features for reproducibility and teaching like a readme, license, .gitignore and Quarto templates
+ can validate existing projects
Creating and validating standardized R project structures that are psych-DS compliant-ish
Making psychological code and data FAIR is hard, in part because different projects organize their code and data very differently.
Sometimes this is for good reasons, such as due to the demands of a g...
mmmdata.io
August 15, 2025 at 6:00 PM
I wrote an R package that creates standardized R project structures that are compliant with @mekline.bsky.social's psych-DS...ish.
It also creates additional features for reproducibility and teaching like a readme, license, .gitignore and Quarto templates
+ can validate existing projects
It also creates additional features for reproducibility and teaching like a readme, license, .gitignore and Quarto templates
+ can validate existing projects
Reposted by Lucija Batinovic
ERROR @error.reviews was awarded a Commendation from the Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science!
✨ ERROR (@error.reviews) is a bug-bounty program for science that seeks to estimate the prevalence and nature of errors. error.reviews
Home
ERROR is a bug bounty program for science to systematically detect and report errors in academic publications
error.reviews
July 25, 2025 at 12:59 PM
ERROR @error.reviews was awarded a Commendation from the Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science!
For anyone who’s published systematic reviews, how often did you succeed in getting unpublished data by reaching out to authors? I don’t mean additional/IP data from published papers, but new data or data they could not get published. #evidencesynthesis
July 16, 2025 at 10:42 AM
For anyone who’s published systematic reviews, how often did you succeed in getting unpublished data by reaching out to authors? I don’t mean additional/IP data from published papers, but new data or data they could not get published. #evidencesynthesis
Reposted by Lucija Batinovic
A lot of discussions about open science in psychology happened on blogs. I have been archiving them and will make their content available. I remember 37 blogs (with 2827 posts!) but which blogs did I forget, and are not on my list? Please share and reply with any that are missing!
July 9, 2025 at 1:51 PM
A lot of discussions about open science in psychology happened on blogs. I have been archiving them and will make their content available. I remember 37 blogs (with 2827 posts!) but which blogs did I forget, and are not on my list? Please share and reply with any that are missing!
Reposted by Lucija Batinovic
New post! "A Tale of Two Science Reform Movements," in which I compare the recent #Metascience2025 and #SIPS2025 conferences, and find that I am much more at home at one than the other. getsyeducated.substack.com/p/a-tale-of-...
A Tale of Two Science Reform Movements
Reflections from meetings of Metascience 2025 and the Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science
getsyeducated.substack.com
July 5, 2025 at 1:00 PM
New post! "A Tale of Two Science Reform Movements," in which I compare the recent #Metascience2025 and #SIPS2025 conferences, and find that I am much more at home at one than the other. getsyeducated.substack.com/p/a-tale-of-...
Reposted by Lucija Batinovic
Agreed, I feel like the overall direction of the entire conference felt too abstract and almost like it’s engaging in “meta-washing”
July 2, 2025 at 8:19 PM
Agreed, I feel like the overall direction of the entire conference felt too abstract and almost like it’s engaging in “meta-washing”
Reposted by Lucija Batinovic
Anyone can do post-publication peer review.
Anyone can be a steward of the scientific literature.
Anyone can do forensic metascience.
Anyone can sleuth.
That's why we are launching COSIG: the Collection of Open Science Integrity Guides, an open source resource for all of the above.
cosig.net
Anyone can be a steward of the scientific literature.
Anyone can do forensic metascience.
Anyone can sleuth.
That's why we are launching COSIG: the Collection of Open Science Integrity Guides, an open source resource for all of the above.
cosig.net
June 4, 2025 at 1:32 PM
Anyone can do post-publication peer review.
Anyone can be a steward of the scientific literature.
Anyone can do forensic metascience.
Anyone can sleuth.
That's why we are launching COSIG: the Collection of Open Science Integrity Guides, an open source resource for all of the above.
cosig.net
Anyone can be a steward of the scientific literature.
Anyone can do forensic metascience.
Anyone can sleuth.
That's why we are launching COSIG: the Collection of Open Science Integrity Guides, an open source resource for all of the above.
cosig.net
What came first, the paper idea or the acronym
Most weeks I recommend to our Leeds @ukrepro.bsky.social network an "Open Research Friday Reading". Why not share it here, too?
Today I shared "A Manifesto for a Globally DEI Open Science" by @sakshighai.bsky.social et al. - important read for any social scientist ☝️
www.nature.com/articles/s44...
Today I shared "A Manifesto for a Globally DEI Open Science" by @sakshighai.bsky.social et al. - important read for any social scientist ☝️
www.nature.com/articles/s44...
A manifesto for a globally diverse, equitable, and inclusive open science - Communications Psychology
Psychology must embrace more responsible practices in design, reporting, generalisation, and evaluation of research to counteract the spectre of Questionable Generalisability Practices and the issue o...
www.nature.com
May 27, 2025 at 9:45 AM
What came first, the paper idea or the acronym
Reposted by Lucija Batinovic
5. This is the moment of truth.
The metascience community could tout this as a win and fundraise off of it, cementing their legacy as useful idiots.
Or they can side with science, boldly speaking out about the bad-faith ways the Trump administration is co-opting their language and momentum.
The metascience community could tout this as a win and fundraise off of it, cementing their legacy as useful idiots.
Or they can side with science, boldly speaking out about the bad-faith ways the Trump administration is co-opting their language and momentum.
May 24, 2025 at 5:26 AM
5. This is the moment of truth.
The metascience community could tout this as a win and fundraise off of it, cementing their legacy as useful idiots.
Or they can side with science, boldly speaking out about the bad-faith ways the Trump administration is co-opting their language and momentum.
The metascience community could tout this as a win and fundraise off of it, cementing their legacy as useful idiots.
Or they can side with science, boldly speaking out about the bad-faith ways the Trump administration is co-opting their language and momentum.
Reposted by Lucija Batinovic
May 23, 2025 at 4:12 PM
Reposted by Lucija Batinovic
Autistic adults talk about disclosure: "assumptions and lack of understanding about autism meant that not only did disclosure not lead to the desired effect of having their needs met, but they were also either dismissed or discriminated against" journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/... free
‘Am I gonna regret this?’: The experiences of diagnostic disclosure in autistic adults - Sheena K Au-Yeung, Megan Freeth, Andrew R Thompson, 2025
An increasing number of people receive autism diagnoses in adulthood, and there are few studies investigating autistic adults’ experiences of disclosing their d...
journals.sagepub.com
May 17, 2025 at 9:49 AM
Autistic adults talk about disclosure: "assumptions and lack of understanding about autism meant that not only did disclosure not lead to the desired effect of having their needs met, but they were also either dismissed or discriminated against" journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/... free
Brandolini underestimated how many orders of magnitude are involved
Exactly a year ago, a paper claimed apple cider vinegar was as effective as Ozempic for weight loss. *Clearly wrong.*
This is the story of exactly one year of dealing with this paper.
And the very normal, very complete failure of governance that resulted.
open.substack.com/pub/jamescla...
This is the story of exactly one year of dealing with this paper.
And the very normal, very complete failure of governance that resulted.
open.substack.com/pub/jamescla...
Research Integrity Is A Clown Car Which Continually Spills Forth A Truly Surprising Quantity Of Sad, Honking, Incompetent Clowns
The anatomy of an utter failure of academic governance
open.substack.com
May 1, 2025 at 5:02 PM
Brandolini underestimated how many orders of magnitude are involved
🎉 Exciting news from FORRT!
FORRT’s Educators' Corner just dropped a new resource: Community-Augmented Meta-Analyses in Education (ELD CAMA)! 🌍
📝 Ready to contribute?
🔗 Dive in: forrt.org/educators-co...
#OpenScience #Education #MetaAnalysis #OpenEducation
FORRT’s Educators' Corner just dropped a new resource: Community-Augmented Meta-Analyses in Education (ELD CAMA)! 🌍
📝 Ready to contribute?
🔗 Dive in: forrt.org/educators-co...
#OpenScience #Education #MetaAnalysis #OpenEducation
Community-Augmented Meta-Analyses in Education (ELD CAMA)
ELD CAMA platform was created to keep systematic reviews alive and continuously updated with new data. It’s a community-driven platform where researchers can easily upload and access educational inter...
forrt.org
April 30, 2025 at 2:43 PM
For people who published/conducted Stage 2 registered reports, have you ever had issues that required significant deviations from the Stage 1 and how have you handled this? Are there any instances where this did not lead to rejection? #openscience
April 24, 2025 at 7:30 PM
For people who published/conducted Stage 2 registered reports, have you ever had issues that required significant deviations from the Stage 1 and how have you handled this? Are there any instances where this did not lead to rejection? #openscience
Can I do another PhD 🥺👉🏽👈🏽
I am hiring a PhD student on the meaningful interpretation of effect sizes as part of my VICI funded project. This is a 4 year paid position in a welcoming and collaborative environment. Find out more or apply at www.tue.nl/werken-bij-t...
PhD on Metascience
www.tue.nl
April 24, 2025 at 12:39 PM
Can I do another PhD 🥺👉🏽👈🏽
Reposted by Lucija Batinovic
I am hiring a PhD student on the meaningful interpretation of effect sizes as part of my VICI funded project. This is a 4 year paid position in a welcoming and collaborative environment. Find out more or apply at www.tue.nl/werken-bij-t...
PhD on Metascience
www.tue.nl
April 23, 2025 at 10:23 PM
I am hiring a PhD student on the meaningful interpretation of effect sizes as part of my VICI funded project. This is a 4 year paid position in a welcoming and collaborative environment. Find out more or apply at www.tue.nl/werken-bij-t...