Agree.

But those pre-emptively using it are not, of course, being honest about their motivations, and it may be that their political calculations expose themselves to a non-Charter attack under the Roncarelli principles. Old law is ofetne good law. the Magna Carta is still relevant.

Most politicians are, not surprisingly, as brutally honest as was Duplessis. But today, we have Legault, Smith, Moe, and perhaps others, who are channeling Duplessis by pre-emptively using the s. 33 override. the override exists for a reason, recourse where the s. 1 balancing goes awry.

Frank Roncarelli, a restauranteur, supported his fellow Jehovah's Witnesses, frequently standing bail for them. Duplessis, who had directed they be harrassed, ordered denial of Roncarelli's liquor license renewal. He made no bones about why. Rand held Duplessis to account. Damages were awarded.

That’s even more hilarious. Thanks.

Mach II CF-105 Arrow. Beautiful

Vague statements that they have a legal opinion from one or more anonymous lawyers are the hallmark if someone who is bluffing with a pair of twos, or who has confused their Google search with my law degree and license to practice.

Same here. Good to see you.

David when did you get over here?