Nathaniel Haines
@natehaines.bsky.social
800 followers 350 following 140 posts
Paid to do p(b | a) p(a) p(a | b) = ————————— p(b) Data Scientist | Computational Psychologist | Devout Bayesian https://bayesianbeginnings.com/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
natehaines.bsky.social
oops, alpha = cronbach's alpha, which is a very common measure of reliability in the psychonetric lit en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cronbac...
Cronbach's alpha - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
natehaines.bsky.social
because alpha is math equivalent to the average (length adjusted) split half reliability, it fits this use case well. e.g. if you score 4 of 8 items (call this test A score) and then also the left out 4 (test B score), the correlation of test A and B (across test takers) is what alpha measures
natehaines.bsky.social
yeah sounds like OP is after something similar to the concept of reliability (in the psychometric sense, although not sure what the construct is here)

the whole simulation thing doesn't seem necessary if that's the case—the standard reliability measures will do
natehaines.bsky.social
awesome post, and couldn't agree more with the thesis

R is great because it "just works" most of the time
emilyriederer.bsky.social
Really insightful post from Julie Tibshirani (spotted in LinkedIn, can't find on Bsky) reflecting on #rstats 's unique governance structure and what can be learned for other languages

jtibs.substack.com/p/if-all-the...
If all the world were a monorepo
The R ecosystem and the case for extreme empathy in software maintenance
jtibs.substack.com
natehaines.bsky.social
Job update! It has been a little over a month now, but I'm excited to share that I have joined Oscar Health, where I'm leading a team focused on our clinical risk adjustment process 🤓
natehaines.bsky.social
wooahh! need to give this a read 🤓
richarddmorey.bsky.social
Paper drop, for anyone interested in #metascience, #statistics, or #metaanalysis! @clintin.bsky.social and I show in a new paper in JASA that the P-curve, a popular forensic meta-analysis method, has deeply undesirable statistical properties. www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.... 1/?
Cover page for the manuscript: Morey, R. D., & Davis-Stober, C. P. (2025). On the poor statistical properties of the P-curve meta-analytic procedure. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2025.2544397 Abstract for the paper: The P-curve (Simonsohn, Nelson, & Simmons, 2014; Simonsohn, Simmons, & Nelson, 2015) is a widely-used suite of meta-analytic tests advertised for detecting problems in sets of studies. They are based on nonparametric combinations of p values (e.g., Marden, 1985) across significant (p < .05) studies and are variously claimed to detect “evidential value”, “lack of evidential value”, and “left skew” in p values. We show that these tests do not have the properties ascribed to them. Moreover, they fail basic desiderata for tests, including admissibility and monotonicity. In light of these serious problems, we recommend against the use of the P-curve tests.
natehaines.bsky.social
Ah yeah most of the work im familiar with skews toward generative models. e.g. like this classic piece, which captures various interactions between Stroop conditions, learning effects, etc.

psycnet.apa.org/record/1990-...
APA PsycNet
psycnet.apa.org
natehaines.bsky.social
Probably not what you are referring to, but the Stroop task is our main example here: psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/202...
APA PsycNet
share.google
natehaines.bsky.social
yeah this is a great set
natehaines.bsky.social
Wish I could have made it in person!
natehaines.bsky.social
i have now vented on reddit and bsky so maybe i will feel better about it now
natehaines.bsky.social
last of us S2 E2, more like last episode amirite
natehaines.bsky.social
the moment some unintuitive simulation and empirical results finally click and you know what needs to be done 🤌

a feeling vibe coders can only dream of
natehaines.bsky.social
Thanks for the endorsement! Awesome to hear it's been influential to your work 😁

And yes the KL finding is super interesting by itself, happy to hear someone found it buried in the supplement ha
natehaines.bsky.social
Thank you! Glad you have found it useful 🤓
natehaines.bsky.social
it was horrible, there were 10+ papers based on the initial preprint/blog that were in print before this one eventually made it there 😅
natehaines.bsky.social
SIX YEARS after the initial blog post, this paper is finally published.. what a wild ride

- the blog: bit.ly/3GbOqQa
- original tweet thread: x.com/Nate__Haines...
- published (open access) paper: doi.org/10.1037/met0...
natehaines.bsky.social
Yeah I've found LLM tech good for stuff that is mostly boilerplate (e.g. some general software development stuff), but when it comes to modeling work that is necessarily bespoke, they are quite bad
natehaines.bsky.social
sounds like a black mirror episode
junlper.beer
half of the posts on twitter remind me that the dead internet theory is very real
natehaines.bsky.social
But I have not read into this lit much tbh, so I have a biased sampling of what people think 😁