Aaron Faanes
parsegrapher.bsky.social
Aaron Faanes
@parsegrapher.bsky.social
Software dev, Cali/Texas, INFJ, divorced, millennial. Likes reading about Jung, IFS, programming, art, social change.
Larry Summers? The economist? They're merely talking about sports here!
November 12, 2025 at 9:32 PM
"you might want to tell your dem friends that treating trump like a mafia don, ignores the fact that he has great
dangerous power. . tightening the noose too slowly, risks a very bad situation." -Epstein in 2018
November 12, 2025 at 7:28 PM
I wouldn't go anywhere near the White House until the 20,000 released docs are combed over, especially in a place like the Situation Room.
November 12, 2025 at 7:27 PM
"you might want to tell your dem friends that treating trump like a mafia don, ignores the fact that he has great
dangerous power. . tightening the noose too slowly, risks a very bad situation." -Epstein in 2018
November 12, 2025 at 7:25 PM
They don't need to criticize him. They need only deflect blame for themselves, which folding early allowed them to do, so the monster claim only applies to Trump, who is apparently immune to such accusations.

If I may reference the movie Heat: "Vincent, both of them are not carrying anything."
Heat - surveillance
YouTube video by Bib48_MovieClips
www.youtube.com
November 11, 2025 at 6:17 PM
If these people were so safe, then why not stick with their own party?
November 11, 2025 at 6:11 PM
So since Congress - which includes Republicans - had already agreed to fund SNAP, can't Republicans in Congress just argue that they weren't going to starve people? That it was the executive that was fighting it in the courts, not the legislative.
November 11, 2025 at 5:35 PM
The courts were ruling in favor of the Dem “no one should starve” position already, though. Courts were saying SNAP should be fully funded, in fact, as of this week, so it’s not like they expedited SNAP funding by folding.
November 11, 2025 at 5:21 PM
If these people were so safe, then why not stick with their own party?
November 11, 2025 at 4:52 PM
Either didn't control them, or did control them and just tried to save face by having retiring/non-election year Dems vote for it.

It's not like he's calling them out, so what's he leading?
November 11, 2025 at 3:33 PM
Durbin voted for it, and he's the No. 2 Senate Dem, the minority whip.

Like I get that he can't control everyone, but he didn't even control his own leadership. Klobuchar is No. 3 and she voted against it.
November 11, 2025 at 3:32 PM
Reposted by Aaron Faanes
Right before finding out which way SCOTUS comes down on the question of starving millions of children? That's the worst, stupidest time to cave. It's really weird that Dem Senators are posting pretending like they don't know that.

Sheldon Whitehouse absolutely understood what Jackson, J did. 🧵
November 11, 2025 at 7:37 AM
But Ecclesiastes says this is chasing after the wind. Even the paragons and villains of our age will be lost to time, and nothing is new under the sun.

The truth is that no man is an island, that perspective is limited, that power is limited.

"Who can straighten
what he has made crooked?"
November 11, 2025 at 7:11 AM
Even this healthcare shit taps into that same vein. "Why not just give YOU the money? Doesn't that increase your individual power, and isn't that all that really matters?"

With images of powerful individuals validating that sense of "Yes! This could work! Look how it's worked for them!"
November 11, 2025 at 7:11 AM