@partyfavour.bsky.social
110 followers 300 following 460 posts
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
partyfavour.bsky.social
So if someone from a working class background visited our top public schools and commented that they only saw wealthy posh people, implying they were not integrated with UK society - would that be ok?
partyfavour.bsky.social
We do have a problem with people who don't integrate and harm social cohesion. Posh cunts. Take our money and laugh at us.
partyfavour.bsky.social
Legitimate concern. Unless now BBC are going to challenge all political parties?
partyfavour.bsky.social
Thalidomide was not approved by the FDA. In the UK, the Thalidomide debacle led to the creation of the medicines act and setting of standards for evidence and review of risks and benefits of medicines. The case he's citing is exactly why experts approve drugs, not politicians and journalists.
partyfavour.bsky.social
Answer to question Robinson poses, right-wing media, including BBC, ran stories about free speech and " two-tier" justice without providing critical analysis. Also, BBC 'balanced view' appears to mean giving free reign to lies and ignoring even slightly left wing views.
partyfavour.bsky.social
Now, do right-wing grifters selling supplements correlation with everything shit. 🤔
partyfavour.bsky.social
No. He only supported the successful Brexit, which exists out in the multiverse somewhere. Maybe the same universe where people have hot dog shaped floppy fingers.
partyfavour.bsky.social
Britain's place post Brexit. Bow down to power.
partyfavour.bsky.social
"Sells one of her properties." So, not that scared then?
partyfavour.bsky.social
Has Farage been Catfished?
partyfavour.bsky.social
Tweets Gabriel. Webb cited Bluesky, evoking a callous lefty echo chamber as being the prevailing problem. And you think the Google search engine isn't pulling out the most click bait Tweets?
partyfavour.bsky.social
Is she advocating Scots, Welsh, and Cornish independence, along with Irish unification?
partyfavour.bsky.social
But in bad faith and without without evidence. Are you and Nige related? Adios.
partyfavour.bsky.social
Unlike Farage, I present evidence and answer follow-up questions. You, on the other hand...
partyfavour.bsky.social
Used to getting your own way there Joe. Public forum, pal.
partyfavour.bsky.social
Do you agree that Farage at least implied that the UK should be sanctioned, based on the information supplied? If not, you are defending Farage against that accusation. If you continue to argue otherwise, you're acting in bad faith, or the "double digit IQ" definition may not apply to you. Bye!
partyfavour.bsky.social
Shown it. Express, Reuters and PM all stated Farage briefing Trump administration to sanction countries he accused of "suppressing free speech," including the UK. Your response of ignoring the evidence in order to defend Farage is disingenuous at best. Bye, bye.
partyfavour.bsky.social
Vs the fact they do. The PM said exactly that. Bit of a waste of time, with you acting so obtusely. You can defend Farage against these accusations, for whatever reason, but the evidence is there unless you choose to ignore it.
partyfavour.bsky.social
If you read the Reuters or Express links, you don't believe that provides evidence? What makes you believe them saying what he would say is untrue? Do you think you declaring reporting untrue means there is a lack of evidence? One credible source and Reform's mouthpiece. Third point, the PM.
partyfavour.bsky.social
Perhaps name three things? I'm trying to establish if you are being disingenuous to avoid acknowledging the evidence from two sources regarding Farage's encouragement of the Trump administration to sanction the UK, amongst others, based on false claims regarding "free speech".
partyfavour.bsky.social
So if you want your criticism of Farage based on facts you know or understand, what do you believe makes him a tremendous threat to the people of the UK?