Peter Mc Daid
banner
petermcdaid.bsky.social
Peter Mc Daid
@petermcdaid.bsky.social
lotsa interests, fairly-ambidextrous. Feel I'm pretty well-adjusted until faced with self-checkout. Swings, roundabouts.
not even if I put it in all caps?
November 12, 2025 at 1:07 PM
clearly not a good one.
November 12, 2025 at 9:15 AM
yeah, again. They muse on this on the podcast.
November 12, 2025 at 9:00 AM
I have this on regular rotation. No talking points allowed.
November 12, 2025 at 8:59 AM
you wouldn't write that if you knew the podcast.
November 12, 2025 at 8:58 AM
completely inaccurate. This is referring to a media appearance in May of 2024: www.newsweek.com/hillary-clin...
Hillary Clinton says pro-Palestinian protesters uneducated on Middle East
"Propaganda is not education," Clinton said, while arguing that young people are consuming "woefully false" information online.
www.newsweek.com
November 9, 2025 at 10:18 AM
instead of making this headline a matter of 'vibes' you could have written 'voters seem to have seen the real data', or 'voters have lived the reality'....because there is hard data coming out daily. Why waffle, this way?
November 6, 2025 at 9:26 AM
You are the problem.
November 2, 2025 at 1:00 AM
You are the problem.
November 2, 2025 at 12:54 AM
you just witnessed the largest single-day demonstration in American history. The Dems impeached DJT, twice. You're focusing on Dems. You are the problem.
November 2, 2025 at 12:47 AM
'fleeced'. You should post that word one more time and see if it sticks. Or maybe you get an extra ruble for each upload? Hard to know, for certain.
November 2, 2025 at 12:42 AM
you're either a bot or hopelessly stupid. You don't equate the party reversing the ACA and installing fascism in the USA in 2025 - with the party opposing both of these actions. 'until it passes'. Man, what you don't know about the levers of power in Congress is shocking. (or not, actually)
November 2, 2025 at 12:41 AM
I come with receipts. You come with 'rants'. You're not getting likes or support on this thread for a reason.
November 2, 2025 at 12:34 AM
No, it was on the table and Blue Dogs killed it. But Blue Dogs didn't then vote to repeal the expansion we did get - over 70 times. Yes? And HR1, which would have reversed Citizens United, was filibustered by the GOP from 2019 to 2021. You're uninformed and you're lazy.
November 2, 2025 at 12:32 AM
they didn't have the votes for Medicare for All; but they passed a bill that restored healthcare to 14 million Americans. These two parties are not the same. And the two halves of your brain are equally dysfunctional.
November 2, 2025 at 12:26 AM
not irrelevant. Let me help you - Dems want subsidies for the ACA re-activated. That's why it's shut down. Republicans have tried to fully-repeal the ACA over 70 times, you preposterous clown. Grow the f*ck up, or shut the f*ck up, because 'both sides' only breeds cynicism, not activism.
November 2, 2025 at 12:15 AM
a lovely combo of superiority and word salad. Tell me, Shawn, why is this 'Govt. Of by & for the People' shut down, at present?
November 1, 2025 at 2:09 PM
there's always one 'both sides' schmuck in the comments...
November 1, 2025 at 1:49 PM
a nepo-baby and a carpet-bagger. Who could ask for anything more?
October 22, 2025 at 12:48 PM