I'm not sure whether you can compare anything here to "normal", but certainly it would not be noteworthy for a decision which acknowledges the court "hasn't squarely addressed" an issue but approves of and adopts other circuits approaches to be published.

Notably, the 11th Circuit published opinion ruling against DJT was also per curiam cases.justia.com/federal/appe...

Indeed. Of course there is no requirement that this have been an unpublished opinion.

Yet per curiam, to avoid the targeted wrath against a particular judge

Does a 23(f) go to a motions panel? I don't know what a "non-substantive order" is.

Yes, see e.g., storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

But skeeting that doesn't get you 100k followers!

But pundits on social media said it was amazing!

I don't think her aggressive style in argument is remotely comparable to getting up and ranting about the legitimacy of the Court and morality of other opinions.

No no, the Supreme Court justices are just one more sick burn from a law professor podcast or slate think piece from changing their minds