riverhax.bsky.social
@riverhax.bsky.social
Traditional and suburban republicans, yes. His core maga, not really.
November 13, 2025 at 7:38 PM
100 explicit videos could be released and the maga base wouldn’t care. Everyone else already knows the president is a corrupt, dirty old man. The world knows. Maga live in a different reality. He is their identity. Morals don’t come into it. They won’t desert him. Ever. Unless he took their guns.
November 13, 2025 at 5:43 PM
100 explicit videos could be released and the maga base wouldn’t care. Everyone else already knows the president is a corrupt, dirty old man. The world knows. Maga live in a different reality. He is their identity. Morals don’t come into it. They won’t desert him. Ever. Unless he took their guns.
November 13, 2025 at 5:39 PM
Got to be a contender for most disgusting individual on the planet. Moral rot incarnate.
November 7, 2025 at 9:47 PM
I had no idea it was on in Cardiff or I’d have bought a couple of tickets. I didn’t go looking but at the same time I heard nothing about it anywhere.
November 5, 2025 at 5:45 PM
Exactly, it should! At least then users would know it’s guessing rather than calculating. Transparency beats false authority every time. As users, we should be told which model can reliably do what.
October 27, 2025 at 6:51 PM
That’s the real issue. The AI in search results gives an illusion of reliability without verification, that’s a design and governance failure. It doesn’t justify treating all AI systems as equally untrustworthy. The criticism should target how this particular model is being presented to the public.
October 27, 2025 at 6:47 PM
The AI model used has the maths reasoning of an average 6 year old.
October 27, 2025 at 6:41 PM
The issue here isn’t “AI” in the broad sense, it’s the misuse of a generative language model for factual tasks it wasn’t designed for.
October 27, 2025 at 6:15 PM
Agreed. LLMs like the one used in Google’s AI Overviews shouldn’t be presented as calculators or fact-checkers. They’re built to predict likely text, not to verify.It isn’t AI in general, it’s how a generative model is being used and presented. Users should be informed to choose the right tool.
October 27, 2025 at 6:02 PM
I agree completely. These tools present guesses as facts without showing how they got there. That is a design flaw, not a user error. But you can check which AI will get the best results for the job at hand. Not all AI are created equally.
October 27, 2025 at 5:10 PM
When you say AI making a basic error, it assumes all AI. Google AI overview doesn’t do maths. It searches for what others have said and doesn’t check. Whereas ChatGPT would do the maths and check against real time official sources. You need the right tool for the right job.
October 27, 2025 at 4:55 PM
Sorry, I believe you. Crosswalks where I am are called zebra crossings, they are black and white stripes spanning the road where pedestrians can cross. The skunk, also being black and white, may be seen, then not seen, then seen as it matches the background of the crossing.
I was just playing.
September 24, 2025 at 12:24 PM
No you didn’t…
September 24, 2025 at 8:36 AM
No you didn’t….
September 24, 2025 at 8:28 AM
10 Bootham Terrace, York. Very likely to be generic Victorian keystone portrait and lion corbels from around 1865. Purpose is to give the building gravitas. Found detail on historic England.

historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-...
historicengland.org.uk
July 15, 2025 at 9:17 AM
Thanks. I think I was looking less for craft advice and more for how experienced writers manage the psychological gap between the size of an idea and the limitations of a first draft. I should have worked my question better. But I appreciate your time and perspective.
July 7, 2025 at 1:02 PM
Thanks. Not just a craft issue, more a mismatch between the scope I can see and what the first draft can actually hold. So I guess I’m wondering how do you keep trusting that the depth will emerge over drafts, especially when the early version feels like a pale shadow of what you’re trying to write?
July 7, 2025 at 12:50 PM
Thanks. When you’re working on a story that feels huge in your head but small or underwhelming on the page, how do you keep going without getting demoralised or losing faith in it? That gap between big idea and execution really throws me off, and I’m curious how you or others navigate that stage.
July 7, 2025 at 12:15 PM
When the story in my head feels huge, layered, and meaningful, but the first draft feels flat, fragmented, or small, how do I keep going without losing faith in the process? It’s a novel of speculative fiction with a sci-fi core.
July 7, 2025 at 11:46 AM
Please don’t bake me, no don’t shake me, leave me as I am, I’m only kneading…
June 19, 2025 at 9:04 AM
Strange thing is, if you asked it, it would completely agree with you.
May 22, 2025 at 8:01 PM
You forgot the worst one…. Baby man.
December 20, 2024 at 7:46 PM
For those who don’t know, it reads “Mark Viduka for SN
Once an impressive striker, the perfect link between Dinamo and Celtic ahead of the big Maksimir Tuesday
“I AM A PURGER, MY CLUB IS DINAMO!”
At home, we are still the favorites against Celtic”
December 9, 2024 at 8:43 PM
Kafka on the Shore. It has been recommended to me a number of times and I’ve finally got around to getting a copy.
November 12, 2024 at 1:11 PM