Rudy D
@rudydb.bsky.social
That’s so great man
Ethan doing amazing things with his network and so happy for him and his crew.
But when you two go at it. It’s fantastic banter.
Ball night!!!!
Ethan doing amazing things with his network and so happy for him and his crew.
But when you two go at it. It’s fantastic banter.
Ball night!!!!
November 7, 2025 at 5:41 PM
That’s so great man
Ethan doing amazing things with his network and so happy for him and his crew.
But when you two go at it. It’s fantastic banter.
Ball night!!!!
Ethan doing amazing things with his network and so happy for him and his crew.
But when you two go at it. It’s fantastic banter.
Ball night!!!!
What’s up B, when you coming on at 5 on the floor again.
You and @ethanjskolnick.bsky.social have the best banters
You and @ethanjskolnick.bsky.social have the best banters
November 6, 2025 at 8:50 PM
What’s up B, when you coming on at 5 on the floor again.
You and @ethanjskolnick.bsky.social have the best banters
You and @ethanjskolnick.bsky.social have the best banters
Execution and implementation will be very important
Let’s hope some policies stick and have a positive impact
Let’s hope some policies stick and have a positive impact
November 5, 2025 at 5:01 PM
Execution and implementation will be very important
Let’s hope some policies stick and have a positive impact
Let’s hope some policies stick and have a positive impact
I just never heard of her before to even know.
I wasn’t about to rewatch old watts footage
CBS editorial is the real concern
I wasn’t about to rewatch old watts footage
CBS editorial is the real concern
October 9, 2025 at 12:49 AM
I just never heard of her before to even know.
I wasn’t about to rewatch old watts footage
CBS editorial is the real concern
I wasn’t about to rewatch old watts footage
CBS editorial is the real concern
Hey Tom,
ICE taking a steak in polymkt…..
Which ICE? I need clarification 🤣
ICE taking a steak in polymkt…..
Which ICE? I need clarification 🤣
October 7, 2025 at 1:28 PM
Hey Tom,
ICE taking a steak in polymkt…..
Which ICE? I need clarification 🤣
ICE taking a steak in polymkt…..
Which ICE? I need clarification 🤣
I know you are right.
100% right.
100% right.
a man in a tuxedo and bow tie is looking at a green ball in the air .
ALT: a man in a tuxedo and bow tie is looking at a green ball in the air .
media.tenor.com
October 7, 2025 at 1:06 AM
I know you are right.
100% right.
100% right.
The proper follow up now is:
Mr president now that you’ve acknowledged that would consider the pardon of a convicted sex offender. What would you tell the victims of her crimes to justify the pardon?
Ask every day, ask the press secretary. Ask Wiles, Miller, Rubio and Basset.
Mr president now that you’ve acknowledged that would consider the pardon of a convicted sex offender. What would you tell the victims of her crimes to justify the pardon?
Ask every day, ask the press secretary. Ask Wiles, Miller, Rubio and Basset.
October 6, 2025 at 10:41 PM
The proper follow up now is:
Mr president now that you’ve acknowledged that would consider the pardon of a convicted sex offender. What would you tell the victims of her crimes to justify the pardon?
Ask every day, ask the press secretary. Ask Wiles, Miller, Rubio and Basset.
Mr president now that you’ve acknowledged that would consider the pardon of a convicted sex offender. What would you tell the victims of her crimes to justify the pardon?
Ask every day, ask the press secretary. Ask Wiles, Miller, Rubio and Basset.
The proper follow up now is:
Mr president now that you’ve acknowledged that would consider the pardon of a convicted sex offender. What’s would you tell the victims of her crimes to justify the pardon?
Ask every day, ask the press secretary. Ask Wiles, Miller, Rubio and Basset.
Mr president now that you’ve acknowledged that would consider the pardon of a convicted sex offender. What’s would you tell the victims of her crimes to justify the pardon?
Ask every day, ask the press secretary. Ask Wiles, Miller, Rubio and Basset.
October 6, 2025 at 10:35 PM
The proper follow up now is:
Mr president now that you’ve acknowledged that would consider the pardon of a convicted sex offender. What’s would you tell the victims of her crimes to justify the pardon?
Ask every day, ask the press secretary. Ask Wiles, Miller, Rubio and Basset.
Mr president now that you’ve acknowledged that would consider the pardon of a convicted sex offender. What’s would you tell the victims of her crimes to justify the pardon?
Ask every day, ask the press secretary. Ask Wiles, Miller, Rubio and Basset.
Peggy knew his boss was a snake 🐍 when she endorsed the candidate.
She was clutching her pearls about VP Harris, calling her a “bitch” in those same WSJ pages.
This is what you voted for. This is what the WSJ endorsed.
Peggy sucks. She’s been setting women back since she worked for Ronald Regan.
She was clutching her pearls about VP Harris, calling her a “bitch” in those same WSJ pages.
This is what you voted for. This is what the WSJ endorsed.
Peggy sucks. She’s been setting women back since she worked for Ronald Regan.
October 5, 2025 at 5:17 PM
Peggy knew his boss was a snake 🐍 when she endorsed the candidate.
She was clutching her pearls about VP Harris, calling her a “bitch” in those same WSJ pages.
This is what you voted for. This is what the WSJ endorsed.
Peggy sucks. She’s been setting women back since she worked for Ronald Regan.
She was clutching her pearls about VP Harris, calling her a “bitch” in those same WSJ pages.
This is what you voted for. This is what the WSJ endorsed.
Peggy sucks. She’s been setting women back since she worked for Ronald Regan.
I agree, it is very lazy politics.
I also agree that the candidate that rallies more voters usually wins…and I too believe policy is the best way to do that.
I just want to win again, it will be easer to win if we play into the bullshit you correctly described.
I’m with w/candidate we field
I also agree that the candidate that rallies more voters usually wins…and I too believe policy is the best way to do that.
I just want to win again, it will be easer to win if we play into the bullshit you correctly described.
I’m with w/candidate we field
October 5, 2025 at 3:45 AM
I agree, it is very lazy politics.
I also agree that the candidate that rallies more voters usually wins…and I too believe policy is the best way to do that.
I just want to win again, it will be easer to win if we play into the bullshit you correctly described.
I’m with w/candidate we field
I also agree that the candidate that rallies more voters usually wins…and I too believe policy is the best way to do that.
I just want to win again, it will be easer to win if we play into the bullshit you correctly described.
I’m with w/candidate we field
Yet, almost all them who still identify as 🐘 would vote for him again or continue to support another GOP candidate in an upcoming election.
It’s not the economy that drives them. It’s the misogyny and racism.
It’s the unwillingness to say “I made a mistake”
It’s not the economy that drives them. It’s the misogyny and racism.
It’s the unwillingness to say “I made a mistake”
October 4, 2025 at 10:03 PM
Yet, almost all them who still identify as 🐘 would vote for him again or continue to support another GOP candidate in an upcoming election.
It’s not the economy that drives them. It’s the misogyny and racism.
It’s the unwillingness to say “I made a mistake”
It’s not the economy that drives them. It’s the misogyny and racism.
It’s the unwillingness to say “I made a mistake”
So it wasn’t 1%?
What about the electoral college total? Would a “winnable” PA have made a difference if it went 1.71% the other way?
But I do fully agree that trump exaggerates things, often for propaganda effect
And I do agree that republicans are held accountable more by their constituents.
What about the electoral college total? Would a “winnable” PA have made a difference if it went 1.71% the other way?
But I do fully agree that trump exaggerates things, often for propaganda effect
And I do agree that republicans are held accountable more by their constituents.
October 4, 2025 at 8:22 PM
So it wasn’t 1%?
What about the electoral college total? Would a “winnable” PA have made a difference if it went 1.71% the other way?
But I do fully agree that trump exaggerates things, often for propaganda effect
And I do agree that republicans are held accountable more by their constituents.
What about the electoral college total? Would a “winnable” PA have made a difference if it went 1.71% the other way?
But I do fully agree that trump exaggerates things, often for propaganda effect
And I do agree that republicans are held accountable more by their constituents.
Tell Susie Wiles ASAP!
She can talk Cheeto and tell him what do to.
If we are going to blur the lines of executive meddling in the DOJ, then I want this as a consolation grift
Make it a federal case Kash!
She can talk Cheeto and tell him what do to.
If we are going to blur the lines of executive meddling in the DOJ, then I want this as a consolation grift
Make it a federal case Kash!
October 4, 2025 at 2:55 AM
Tell Susie Wiles ASAP!
She can talk Cheeto and tell him what do to.
If we are going to blur the lines of executive meddling in the DOJ, then I want this as a consolation grift
Make it a federal case Kash!
She can talk Cheeto and tell him what do to.
If we are going to blur the lines of executive meddling in the DOJ, then I want this as a consolation grift
Make it a federal case Kash!