You do know the leading cause of polio though right?

So to get this straight you want me to agree that a three day study after injection in babies is acceptable to determine validity of safety?
And if effective is that effective in being the leading cause of polio in the world then yes it is effective.

But please go on.....

I don't think I was clear. After each dose the babies from the pre-licensure clinical trials were only reviewed for 3 days. This is in the IPOL package insert. You can argue against me all you want or claim its misinformation but please inform Sanofi Pasteur that their insert is misinformation.

Can you please tell me what the leading cause of polio is right now? You seem to be someone who's informed.

I don't think I was clear. After each dose the babies from the pre-licensure clinical trials were only reviewed for 3 days. This is in the IPOL package insert. You can argue against me all you want or claim its misinformation but please inform Sanofi Pasteur that their insert is misinformation.

IPOL was licensed by the FDA based on only three days of
safety data after each injection. The package insert for IPOL which described its pre-licensure clinical trials were only reviewed for three days after the injection of each dose into babies.

I posted in response to the original post. So you're ok with a vaccine only being tested for 3 days?

What pseudo science program are you from?

Because I believe in the truth and not misinformation. Now answer my question.

Reread my post and please feel free to refute anything I posted, not some other argument.

So let's reign it back in ok.
You're original comment was because of a post that RFKs lawyer is Trying to scrap THE polio vaccine. This post is completely erroneous, I'm correcting the post so you know exactly what you're commenting on. But you want to take it in another direction.

I'll do you one better, let's understand first why they are spamming this misinformation?

Do you think it's ok for a vaccine to only be studied for 3 days? Is that some kind of pseudo science you can get behind?

I'm just correcting what's been stated, and making things clear. It's important to always stick to the facts right?