He says he’s making tough choices, but cutting funding for the world’s poorest people is the easiest—and cruellest—choice he could make (1/4)
He says he’s making tough choices, but cutting funding for the world’s poorest people is the easiest—and cruellest—choice he could make (1/4)
Which other countries could step up?
www.cgdev.org/blog/which-c...
Which other countries could step up?
www.cgdev.org/blog/which-c...
www.cgdev.org/blog/letting...
www.cgdev.org/blog/letting...
Before 2014, nearly no UK asylum seeker support was funded via aid, even when it faced spikes in applicants similar to today's (eg around 2000).
But what happened in past refugee spikes?
We find if Blair & Brown had taken the current approach, the UK would have spent zero on overseas aid in some years.
A 🧵 on new @cgdev.org analysis w/ @samhugh3s.bsky.social:
Before 2014, nearly no UK asylum seeker support was funded via aid, even when it faced spikes in applicants similar to today's (eg around 2000).
Great to see the @economist.com highlight the UK's misuse use of aid (inc some of our @cgdev.org work w/ @samhugh3s.bsky.social )
economist.com/britain/2024...