Alexis Shore Ingber
@shoreingber.bsky.social
64 followers 160 following 10 posts
Trying to help privacy happen. Media law prof @ Syracuse U More on me here: www.alexisshoreingber.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Alexis Shore Ingber
haimson.bsky.social
Turns out many marginalized Americans are skeptical of / resistant to AI. Thanks Jared Wadley at @umichnews.bsky.social for covering our AI attitudes research! Co-authors: @naz-andalibi.bsky.social, @mayworms.info, @shoreingber.bsky.social

news.umich.edu/marginalized...

dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/...
“AI may be everywhere, but it’s not for everyone - at least not yet. If we continue to ignore the perspectives of marginalized people, we risk building an AI-powered future that deepens inequities rather than reducing them.”
Reposted by Alexis Shore Ingber
haimson.bsky.social
@shoreingber.bsky.social presents our work with @naz-andalibi.bsky.social about people’s perceptions of different types of emotion AI and potential consequences #FAccT2025 dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1...
Alexis Shore Ingber presenting at the FAccT 2025 conference. Slide lists key takeaways: 1. People have significantly more negative attitudes toward emotion AI than AI. 2. People view all input data to emotion AI as sensitive. 3. Many fear negative consequences if their emotion data is shared, especially with powerful actors.
shoreingber.bsky.social
Finally, I was on the team for two more wonderful FAccT papers!:

1) Technical Solutions to Emotion AI's Privacy Harms: A Systematic Literature Review

2) AI Attitudes Among Marginalized Populations in the U.S.: Nonbinary, Transgender, and Disabled Individuals Report More Negative AI Attitudes
shoreingber.bsky.social
Links to the papers:
Emotion AI Regulation: tinyurl.com/bdf7nfth
Emotion AI in Hiring: tinyurl.com/avabvj6d
Sensitivity of Emotion AI Input Data & Recipients: tinyurl.com/3x879x3x
shoreingber.bsky.social
On Tuesday (11am) I'll present 2 more papers focused on emotion AI: 1) an experiment comparing job-seekers engagement with a (fake) emotion AI hiring software with non-emotion AI/human and 2) a survey gauging sensitivity perceptions around emotion AI input data and recipients
@haimson.bsky.social
shoreingber.bsky.social
Thrilled to be at #FAccT2025 sharing the work
@naz-andalibi.bsky.social and I have been developing over the past year! 🥹 Tomorrow, I'll be presenting a paper which provides empirical evidence supporting regulation of emotion AI across contexts of deployment (11:45 AM)
shoreingber.bsky.social
Finally, I was on the team for two more wonderful FAccT papers!:

1) Technical Solutions to Emotion AI's Privacy Harms: A Systematic Literature Review

2) AI Attitudes Among Marginalized Populations in the U.S.: Nonbinary, Transgender, and Disabled Individuals Report More Negative AI Attitudes
shoreingber.bsky.social
Links to the papers:

Emotion AI Regulation: tinyurl.com/bdf7nfth
Emotion AI in Hiring: tinyurl.com/avabvj6d
Sensitivity of Emotion AI Input Data & Recipients: tinyurl.com/3x879x3x
tinyurl.com
shoreingber.bsky.social
On Tuesday (11am) I'll present 2 more papers focused on emotion AI: 1) an experiment comparing job-seekers engagement with a (fake) emotion AI hiring software with non-emotion AI/human and 2) a survey gauging sensitivity perceptions around emotion AI input data and recipients @haimson.bsky.social
Reposted by Alexis Shore Ingber
daniellecitron.bsky.social
Excited to share our latest article (with the amazing @jonpenny.bsky.social and @shoreingber.bsky.social) “The Chilling Effects of Dobbs” in Florida Law Review. The piece grew out of Jon’s creative study and our broader work together on intimate privacy. Here www.floridalawreview.com/article/1381...
Reposted by Alexis Shore Ingber
naz-andalibi.bsky.social
I participated in the Body politics workshop on Saturday. Shoutout to organizers and participants! And today, I will present work done with @shoreingber.bsky.social about #emotionAI across domains in the US. 2:46pm, room G302 #CHI2025
Reposted by Alexis Shore Ingber
maryannefranks.bsky.social
U.S.: insurrectionists go free, but women who've committed no crimes are "bound in chains that wrapped tightly around our waists, with our cuffed hands secured to our bodies and shackles restraining our feet, forcing every movement into a slow, clinking struggle." www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
I’m the Canadian who was detained by Ice for two weeks. It felt like I had been kidnapped
I was stuck in a freezing cell without explanation despite eventually having lawyers and media attention. Yet, compared with others, I was lucky
www.theguardian.com
shoreingber.bsky.social
Happy to share a #CHI25 paper with Jim Cummings & Danny Jia 🎉 We demonstrate that in social VR, 1) interruptions from unknown users reduce disclosure and 2) seeing a conversation partner’s offline profile—mediated by the belief that they are a real person—encourages disclosure. tinyurl.com/35y2dd5m
tinyurl.com
Reposted by Alexis Shore Ingber
naz-andalibi.bsky.social
3) individuals with disabilities and minoritized genders were
significantly less comfortable than others across a variety of contexts; and 4) perceived accuracy explained a large proportion of the variance in comfort levels across contexts. #CHI2025
Reposted by Alexis Shore Ingber
naz-andalibi.bsky.social
1) Although comfort was distinct across 11 contexts, even the most favorable context (healthcare) yielded low comfort levels; 2) participants were significantly more comfortable with inferences of happiness and surprise compared to other emotions; #CHI2025
Reposted by Alexis Shore Ingber
naz-andalibi.bsky.social
Thrilled to share #CHI2025 paper with @shoreingber.bsky.social where we look at US public's attitudes towards emotion AI in general and in 11 contexts including healthcare, work, employment, border control, cars, kids' toys, social media, education, public spaces, etc. Preprint: shorturl.at/sgOiA
shorturl.at
Reposted by Alexis Shore Ingber
shoreingber.bsky.social
I will be speaking at UNH Franklin Pierce School of Law next Monday at 5PM EST as part of a panel discussion about AI bias, offering prospective solutions for law and policy. For more information and to register (there is a Zoom option!) visit here: law.unh.edu/blog/2025/01...
Bias in Technology: The Causes, Consequences, and Possible Solutions
Panelists will discuss how bias affects the technology that has become pervasive in our lives -- and efforts to address it.
law.unh.edu
Reposted by Alexis Shore Ingber
nathaliemarechal.net
Today is International Privacy Day. In light of the systematic dismantling of our federal government, coordinated assaults on society’s most vulnerable, and widespread craven capitulation—why should anyone care about privacy right now? 🧵

cdt.org/insights/thi...
This International Privacy Day, Choosing Hope Over Despair
Fighting for privacy rights has always been an uphill battle, perhaps now more than ever. Despite periodic moments of public outcry over abuses of state and corporate power enabled by egregious data p...
cdt.org
Reposted by Alexis Shore Ingber
salome.bsky.social
This is obviously extremely bad; I'll also just note that they're kneecapping the actual engine of U.S. innovation--our funding of university led basic research-- at the same time China shows how close they are to overtaking US tech. Incredibly stupid.
cabarbieri.bsky.social
I’m an NSF panel reviewer that was scheduled to meet today. Just got notice that all NSF panels were canceled today. I reviewed some innovative proposals in support of students. Devastating if these scholars don’t get to do this work. For the love of science & students I hope this is just a delay.💔
shoreingber.bsky.social
💡NEW SCREENSHOT RESEARCH! I empirically demonstrate interpersonal and affordance-based interventions that can mitigate screenshot collection and sharing of private messages (+ some privacy theory building 🤓): t.co/74NuQ8izsy
Reposted by Alexis Shore Ingber
penney.bsky.social
I wrote about the the TikTok ban in the @theglobeandmail.com. I argue the ban is dead for a few reasons, but mostly because its' design failed to account for the new era that Trump's admin represents: persistent weaponization of tech and state power: www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/arti...
Opinion: The TikTok ban is already dead in the water
No matter what happens next, Donald Trump has already completely undermined the law’s efforts to protect national security from Chinese interference
www.theglobeandmail.com