Si Vis Pacem
@sivispacem1.bsky.social
Patriot 🇺🇸 Veteran 🪖 Member of the Coalition to Ban Pineapple from Pizza 🚫🍍
Welp, that's what happens when you refuse to listen to anything outside of your comfy echo chamber.
January 25, 2025 at 1:41 PM
Welp, that's what happens when you refuse to listen to anything outside of your comfy echo chamber.
Trump has all the rocks too ❤️
January 21, 2025 at 10:57 PM
Trump has all the rocks too ❤️
Oh calm down, it was only his entire criminal enterprise I mean family and he ONLY pardoned Hunter for like, a decade.
He probably could have gone back three decades, but ten seemed good enough.
He probably could have gone back three decades, but ten seemed good enough.
January 21, 2025 at 10:50 PM
Oh calm down, it was only his entire criminal enterprise I mean family and he ONLY pardoned Hunter for like, a decade.
He probably could have gone back three decades, but ten seemed good enough.
He probably could have gone back three decades, but ten seemed good enough.
Remind me again, how long did you believe your Senile-in-Chief was mentally fit before you realized you had been lied to for most of his presidency?
January 21, 2025 at 10:48 PM
Remind me again, how long did you believe your Senile-in-Chief was mentally fit before you realized you had been lied to for most of his presidency?
Lol after all of that back and forth that whiny b*tch blocked me because she resorted to name-calling and I said we were done.
Absolute fucking children.
Absolute fucking children.
January 21, 2025 at 10:35 PM
Lol after all of that back and forth that whiny b*tch blocked me because she resorted to name-calling and I said we were done.
Absolute fucking children.
Absolute fucking children.
I hope I didn't come off as confrontational, I was actually just supporting your statement lol.
And yes, I truly believe we were heading down a slippery slope of tyranny or some flavor of it and it only would have taken one more election.
And yes, I truly believe we were heading down a slippery slope of tyranny or some flavor of it and it only would have taken one more election.
January 21, 2025 at 10:34 PM
I hope I didn't come off as confrontational, I was actually just supporting your statement lol.
And yes, I truly believe we were heading down a slippery slope of tyranny or some flavor of it and it only would have taken one more election.
And yes, I truly believe we were heading down a slippery slope of tyranny or some flavor of it and it only would have taken one more election.
OK. We are done here. Good luck finding someone else to argue with.
January 21, 2025 at 10:24 PM
OK. We are done here. Good luck finding someone else to argue with.
If Biden didn't pardon, or his administration didn't donate to criminals arrested of crimes, or pardoned 8,000 people, I'd be more on board. But again, I'm not condemning Trump when Biden did the same fucking thing.
January 21, 2025 at 10:23 PM
If Biden didn't pardon, or his administration didn't donate to criminals arrested of crimes, or pardoned 8,000 people, I'd be more on board. But again, I'm not condemning Trump when Biden did the same fucking thing.
The point is, if one president is going to pardon people who burned down peoples fucking homes, private property, and have literally fucking killed people, I have no issue with a president who pardons people for "assaulting" police officers.
January 21, 2025 at 10:22 PM
The point is, if one president is going to pardon people who burned down peoples fucking homes, private property, and have literally fucking killed people, I have no issue with a president who pardons people for "assaulting" police officers.
I'm not going to be on your side about this no matter how hard you try. Biden has, in total, pardoned a total of over 8,000 criminals. Protestors, rioters, or otherwise he has pardoned over EIGHT THOUSAND.
January 21, 2025 at 10:20 PM
I'm not going to be on your side about this no matter how hard you try. Biden has, in total, pardoned a total of over 8,000 criminals. Protestors, rioters, or otherwise he has pardoned over EIGHT THOUSAND.
No, you're right. They only donated to a GFM of rioters arrested and charged.
www.reuters.com/article/worl...
www.reuters.com/article/worl...
Biden staff donate to group that pays bail in riot-torn Minneapolis
Campaign staff for Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden are advertising their donations to a group that pays bail fees in Minneapolis after the city's police jailed people protesting the killing of a black man by a white police officer.
www.reuters.com
January 21, 2025 at 10:18 PM
No, you're right. They only donated to a GFM of rioters arrested and charged.
www.reuters.com/article/worl...
www.reuters.com/article/worl...
That about six people (maybe one or two more Proud Boys or Oath Pushers since then) were charged with seditious conspiracy while the rest of the protestors were not found guilty of the same?
Yes, I'm aware that's the point I'm making.
Yes, I'm aware that's the point I'm making.
January 21, 2025 at 10:16 PM
That about six people (maybe one or two more Proud Boys or Oath Pushers since then) were charged with seditious conspiracy while the rest of the protestors were not found guilty of the same?
Yes, I'm aware that's the point I'm making.
Yes, I'm aware that's the point I'm making.
Yeah and I already commented on that more than once. If you're not going to follow and waste my time dragging me around in circles then we're done here.
January 21, 2025 at 10:15 PM
Yeah and I already commented on that more than once. If you're not going to follow and waste my time dragging me around in circles then we're done here.
Yes, we do bring up previous events relating to legislation, judiciary, and criminal events because it sets something called "precedence".
How do you expect Trump to treat those protestors any differently than the way Biden treated the rioters who burned down cities and literally killed people?
How do you expect Trump to treat those protestors any differently than the way Biden treated the rioters who burned down cities and literally killed people?
January 21, 2025 at 10:13 PM
Yes, we do bring up previous events relating to legislation, judiciary, and criminal events because it sets something called "precedence".
How do you expect Trump to treat those protestors any differently than the way Biden treated the rioters who burned down cities and literally killed people?
How do you expect Trump to treat those protestors any differently than the way Biden treated the rioters who burned down cities and literally killed people?
OK, and?
Are you aware over 2,00 officers were attacked, four were shot, and 25 civilians were killed during the BLM riots under Biden's administration and TO DATE only about 300 rioters have been charged?
Where's your outrage there?
Are you aware over 2,00 officers were attacked, four were shot, and 25 civilians were killed during the BLM riots under Biden's administration and TO DATE only about 300 rioters have been charged?
Where's your outrage there?
January 21, 2025 at 10:07 PM
OK, and?
Are you aware over 2,00 officers were attacked, four were shot, and 25 civilians were killed during the BLM riots under Biden's administration and TO DATE only about 300 rioters have been charged?
Where's your outrage there?
Are you aware over 2,00 officers were attacked, four were shot, and 25 civilians were killed during the BLM riots under Biden's administration and TO DATE only about 300 rioters have been charged?
Where's your outrage there?
Before I even allocate my time to offering you the only actual reasonable voice in this thread for a respectable debate, I'd appreciate it if you found just ONE article that wasn't put out by Left wing news outlets and tell me if any of it sounds logical and in contradiction to the Left's.
January 21, 2025 at 9:57 PM
Before I even allocate my time to offering you the only actual reasonable voice in this thread for a respectable debate, I'd appreciate it if you found just ONE article that wasn't put out by Left wing news outlets and tell me if any of it sounds logical and in contradiction to the Left's.
Secondly, no one was actually even charged with actively trying to "overthrow the government", also known as treason.
Because of that, they were only charged with seditious conspiracy, which are "attempts to undermine the government without attacking it".
Knowledge is a dangerous tool.
Because of that, they were only charged with seditious conspiracy, which are "attempts to undermine the government without attacking it".
Knowledge is a dangerous tool.
January 21, 2025 at 9:55 PM
Secondly, no one was actually even charged with actively trying to "overthrow the government", also known as treason.
Because of that, they were only charged with seditious conspiracy, which are "attempts to undermine the government without attacking it".
Knowledge is a dangerous tool.
Because of that, they were only charged with seditious conspiracy, which are "attempts to undermine the government without attacking it".
Knowledge is a dangerous tool.
Six. Six people out of the over 1500 charged for J6 were charged with seditious conspiracy. They were all part of two extremist groups, which the rest of the entirety of the protestors did not belong to and where not there to overthrow the government.
January 21, 2025 at 9:53 PM
Six. Six people out of the over 1500 charged for J6 were charged with seditious conspiracy. They were all part of two extremist groups, which the rest of the entirety of the protestors did not belong to and where not there to overthrow the government.