But if we're having this long conversation of what is confusing and what is not confusing, then why not just add a simple adjective to American to completely alleviate the confusion altogether? Is that easier than making up and using a stupid term like USian that doesn't simplify anything?
November 29, 2025 at 11:36 AM
But if we're having this long conversation of what is confusing and what is not confusing, then why not just add a simple adjective to American to completely alleviate the confusion altogether? Is that easier than making up and using a stupid term like USian that doesn't simplify anything?
But I'm combining one continent. You're combining two continents. The things that affect and define me as an American are gonna be very different than an Argentinian. So the label them both as of Americans, instead of North American or South American, just doesn't make sense to me.
November 29, 2025 at 11:33 AM
But I'm combining one continent. You're combining two continents. The things that affect and define me as an American are gonna be very different than an Argentinian. So the label them both as of Americans, instead of North American or South American, just doesn't make sense to me.
And I think that's very fucking stupid because there's a big difference between North America and South America and referring to either of them as simply America actually loses context. If Europeans want to refer to everyone from The Americas as American, then sure. I won't take them seriously.
November 29, 2025 at 11:25 AM
And I think that's very fucking stupid because there's a big difference between North America and South America and referring to either of them as simply America actually loses context. If Europeans want to refer to everyone from The Americas as American, then sure. I won't take them seriously.
Because if they actually di things to eliminate racism and sexism, they wouldn't have an excuse for when they lose. They need them as a scapegoat so they don't have to do anything that would economically affect their donors.
November 29, 2025 at 2:31 AM
Because if they actually di things to eliminate racism and sexism, they wouldn't have an excuse for when they lose. They need them as a scapegoat so they don't have to do anything that would economically affect their donors.
Ok. I forgot about that term. But Latin American is used to describe elements of both the North and South America. And I would never refer to Latin Americans that aren't citizens of the US as simply Americans. So that doesn't prove anything. The base American is for US citizens.
November 29, 2025 at 2:28 AM
Ok. I forgot about that term. But Latin American is used to describe elements of both the North and South America. And I would never refer to Latin Americans that aren't citizens of the US as simply Americans. So that doesn't prove anything. The base American is for US citizens.
I cannot. I would love an example.
November 29, 2025 at 1:35 AM
I cannot. I would love an example.
What context is that? I don't know of any. And I would never refer to South Americans as Americans without the south in any context. I'm more likely to refer to people from the Global South to refer to South Americans instead of just Americans.
November 29, 2025 at 1:35 AM
What context is that? I don't know of any. And I would never refer to South Americans as Americans without the south in any context. I'm more likely to refer to people from the Global South to refer to South Americans instead of just Americans.
In what context?
November 29, 2025 at 1:20 AM
In what context?
And the fact that they don't call George W Bush a war criminal to his face every opportunity they get shows they don't actually give a shit his war crimes. If you care more about civility and social decorum than real world lives, you're a fucking cunt.
November 29, 2025 at 1:04 AM
And the fact that they don't call George W Bush a war criminal to his face every opportunity they get shows they don't actually give a shit his war crimes. If you care more about civility and social decorum than real world lives, you're a fucking cunt.
You don't hug a war criminal out of politeness. You hug a war criminal because you're able to look past their war crimes because they're a part of the same social class as you because you don't give a fuck about real people.
November 29, 2025 at 1:02 AM
You don't hug a war criminal out of politeness. You hug a war criminal because you're able to look past their war crimes because they're a part of the same social class as you because you don't give a fuck about real people.
Well, he wasn't a dictator want to be at the very least. But he was okay with working with them.
November 29, 2025 at 1:01 AM
Well, he wasn't a dictator want to be at the very least. But he was okay with working with them.
First off, the IOC is horribly corrupt and does not give a fuck about what's fare. They give a fuck about what gives them money. Secondly, they let sports bodies determine their own definition of eligibility. Which includes letting trans people compete. You're just wrong.
November 29, 2025 at 12:59 AM
First off, the IOC is horribly corrupt and does not give a fuck about what's fare. They give a fuck about what gives them money. Secondly, they let sports bodies determine their own definition of eligibility. Which includes letting trans people compete. You're just wrong.
Fucking cowardly transphobic cunt.
November 29, 2025 at 12:55 AM
Fucking cowardly transphobic cunt.
So you're discriminating against trans women. Which is bigotry, because you're not allowing trans women the same rights based solely off their gender identity. That's inherently transphobic. Because your fear of trans women in sports is not reasonable.
November 29, 2025 at 12:53 AM
So you're discriminating against trans women. Which is bigotry, because you're not allowing trans women the same rights based solely off their gender identity. That's inherently transphobic. Because your fear of trans women in sports is not reasonable.
Then enlighten me.
November 29, 2025 at 12:50 AM
Then enlighten me.
Also, you're more likely to get testosterone enhancements in women's sports if you force people to play in the gender, they were born as. Because trans men exist.
November 29, 2025 at 12:47 AM
Also, you're more likely to get testosterone enhancements in women's sports if you force people to play in the gender, they were born as. Because trans men exist.
Also, focusing so much on testosterone enhancements unfairly discriminates against cis women with naturally high testosterone. That's an inherently transphobic viewpoint.
November 29, 2025 at 12:44 AM
Also, focusing so much on testosterone enhancements unfairly discriminates against cis women with naturally high testosterone. That's an inherently transphobic viewpoint.
In adult sports, most organizations have a requirement of being on hormone therapy for at least a year. You could argue that could be increased to 2 years, but that's an entirely different argument than what you're saying. Hormone therapy makes the difference between trans and cis women negligible.
November 29, 2025 at 12:44 AM
In adult sports, most organizations have a requirement of being on hormone therapy for at least a year. You could argue that could be increased to 2 years, but that's an entirely different argument than what you're saying. Hormone therapy makes the difference between trans and cis women negligible.
Except they don't. Especially if we're talking about kids sports. Children don't have testosterone and if they're on puberty blockers, then they won't get testosterone until they get on estrogen. So no testosterone enhancements for children's sports at all.
November 29, 2025 at 12:44 AM
Except they don't. Especially if we're talking about kids sports. Children don't have testosterone and if they're on puberty blockers, then they won't get testosterone until they get on estrogen. So no testosterone enhancements for children's sports at all.
Yes. He agreed with a transphobe's idea of not allowing trans people in sports. That is inherently transphobic. There is no legitimate reason to be afraid of trans people in sports. It's all bullshit transphobic narratives.
November 29, 2025 at 12:18 AM
Yes. He agreed with a transphobe's idea of not allowing trans people in sports. That is inherently transphobic. There is no legitimate reason to be afraid of trans people in sports. It's all bullshit transphobic narratives.
The fact that you're defending liberal Democrats, who do that type of shit all the fucking time, kind of shows that that is true about you. You just don't accept it yet.
November 29, 2025 at 12:17 AM
The fact that you're defending liberal Democrats, who do that type of shit all the fucking time, kind of shows that that is true about you. You just don't accept it yet.
He is though. He literally agreed with an extreme transphobe Charlie Kirk. He's absolutely a transphobe.
November 29, 2025 at 12:03 AM
He is though. He literally agreed with an extreme transphobe Charlie Kirk. He's absolutely a transphobe.
They're fascist enablers. It's that old saying, scratch a liberal in a fascist bleeds. Because liberals will do everything to compromise with fascism while stopping the actual ideas of the left.
November 29, 2025 at 12:02 AM
They're fascist enablers. It's that old saying, scratch a liberal in a fascist bleeds. Because liberals will do everything to compromise with fascism while stopping the actual ideas of the left.
What's the difference between a fascist and a fascist enabler? Because Joe Biden was definitely a fascist enabler. Especially since he helped facilitate a genocide in Gaza.
November 28, 2025 at 11:58 PM
What's the difference between a fascist and a fascist enabler? Because Joe Biden was definitely a fascist enabler. Especially since he helped facilitate a genocide in Gaza.