He/Him/They/Them/Just not late for dinner
Enjoy simple stuff in life, yet getting caught up in the chaos.
Semi retired
Every day in the USA were there is ICE hunting "illegals", I remind people...
Every day in the USA were there is ICE hunting "illegals", I remind people...
President Joe Biden and chef Robert Irvine, right, help serve a "friendsgiving" meal to service members and their relatives at the Norfolk Naval Station on Sunday, Nov. 19, 2023, in Norfolk, Va. (Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP)
www.militarytimes.com/news/your-mi...
President Joe Biden and chef Robert Irvine, right, help serve a "friendsgiving" meal to service members and their relatives at the Norfolk Naval Station on Sunday, Nov. 19, 2023, in Norfolk, Va. (Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP)
www.militarytimes.com/news/your-mi...
A line we've all heard before.
A line we've all heard before.
What are you doing to protect their sovereignty?
www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news...
What are you doing to protect their sovereignty?
www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news...
DISCUSS.
DISCUSS.
To address GUN VIOLENCE we need to discuss that GUN.
To address GUN VIOLENCE we need to discuss that GUN.
What day is it, Justin?
What day is it, Justin?
1) They signed up for that. It's part of the duty.
2) Members of Congress didn't sign on to become targets of political violence lobbied by the president.
3) "What about" arguments excuse not being responsible for a coherent response
1) They signed up for that. It's part of the duty.
2) Members of Congress didn't sign on to become targets of political violence lobbied by the president.
3) "What about" arguments excuse not being responsible for a coherent response
Last on 2008
Last on 2008
These 86 (D)'s enabled the obstructive language that will be used against them time immemorial.
These 86 (D)'s enabled the obstructive language that will be used against them time immemorial.
Senate D's weren't suggesting to disobey LAWFUL orders...
Just UNLAWFUL ones.
It isn't difficult unless your Oath is to a man, instead of a Constitution.
Senate D's weren't suggesting to disobey LAWFUL orders...
Just UNLAWFUL ones.
It isn't difficult unless your Oath is to a man, instead of a Constitution.
The next day he simply stated he wasn't involved and went on ruling.
The next day he simply stated he wasn't involved and went on ruling.
Anything short is the permission structure he's relied upon.
Anything short is the permission structure he's relied upon.