Stu Nathan, science word-wrangler for hire
banner
stunathan.bsky.social
Stu Nathan, science word-wrangler for hire
@stunathan.bsky.social
Storytelling science and technology. Enemy of jargon and wilful obscurity. Often doesn't follow back - nothing personal, just keeping my feed manageable.
It's safest to always assume he was/is lying, but in trust case he definitely was.
December 1, 2025 at 8:29 PM
He used a lot of brown before he moved South, didn't he?
December 1, 2025 at 8:23 PM
How DARE they?
December 1, 2025 at 4:51 PM
I've been feeling like that for weeks, TBH.
December 1, 2025 at 2:59 PM
Shitposting, at a time like this?
November 29, 2025 at 11:15 PM
He bought a farm there in 1966!
November 29, 2025 at 11:04 PM
Just the right level between overplaying and underplaying.
November 29, 2025 at 10:04 PM
Long time since I've seen it, but it freaked me out. The elderly couple really got to me, for some reason.
November 29, 2025 at 8:39 PM
Felt like a one-and-done, but I'd have liked more mysteries with the lead protagonist (whose name I've forgotten).
November 29, 2025 at 8:25 PM
I love the face in the preceding pics!
November 29, 2025 at 8:22 PM
That's just not on. Pterry would have hated that.
November 29, 2025 at 8:20 PM
Nice one, Douglas. I think the rule is if you like watching it at Christmas, it's a Christmas film. When I was a kid, James Bond films always used to be on on Christmas Day, so they still make me think of Christmas (despite being Jewish and everything).
November 29, 2025 at 6:40 PM
I hope he didn't write "Somehow, Palatine returned."
November 29, 2025 at 5:53 PM
Charles Laighton would have made a great Santa.
November 29, 2025 at 3:14 PM
Currently watching Witness for the Prosecution, which I don't *think* is a Christmas movie.
November 29, 2025 at 3:03 PM