Email Vorlage erstellen und vorsichtshalber jeden Tag automatisch senden.

On the plus side I could give these students simple tips about how else they could go about it. In my early bachelor I was definitly the type of guy who got mad when a lecturer said about a proof that you had to develop an eye for how to start or bridge parts of it; so I could relate.

Did do a bit of work as a tutor and while It was normal to see at the start for a lot of students, you could tell that students who were still copying wording and using formulaic aproaches late in the semester, had not spend time to actually think about what they were doing.

As someone who is only used to the german university system, I don't get how "You need to actually cite sources and do some basic evidence backed arguing" is not a default standard assumed even if not put into writing. Also I agree, the goal of that shitty essay was to get something against the TA

And it is not the worst thing that is happening right now, it is however one of many steps to cement a system where the president and the government can ridicule anyone they do not like for whatever reason they want. A sytsem where power cannot be questioned without becomming a direct target.

I wonder who in the US government comes up with this usage of offical websites to go after people and institutions. It is a childish thing to start with, argumentative weak, and so clearly an authoritarian thing to do. But it sets a frame and allows people like the press sec. to cite it when needed.

On one hand, sure, it is propaganda/agenda setting, on the other hand this kind of thing sets a precedent that can be expanded upon if need be. Also it clearly aims to chill reporting without outright forbidding it. If these outlets were all liars, clearly it would be easy for the president to sue

It really is just a long list of accuse the other of what you are doing, huh? A government building a website where it "exposes" what the media is doing, and all of it is wrt articles about the president, not even like general publication stuff, that shit ain't normal.

The argument or whatever they are trying to do on that website is full on bs. They show parts of a video of members of congress saying "You can refuse illegal orders" and then the video goes "President Trump has never given illegal orders". Which is just skating past the point made.

The "Why might AI keep being jagged?" feels like most of these problems should be known to AI researchers and engineers by now. The very first point about tasks being easy/hard to verify especially. 'There are things for which you are not going to get a good reward function/signals' seems obvious.

I have no idea how to write good documentation so every function, class, type, namespace, etc. gets a simple docstring and I just nudge my internal rambling comments a bit around. Once I am certain I do not leak any private info, the code will be published (somewhere, maybe tangled, maybe gitlab).

"Mr Stark I dont feel so good".gif

Is it supposed to do that?

Thankfully I get paid per take, no thinking required from the get-go.