or a corporate flag.

✨SHARE THIS. RAISE HELL. STAND UP.

#SpaceIsNotForSale
#DemilitarizeSpace
#NotOnOurWatch

—Suz & Alex

Thanks for a last laugh at bedtime, Pete—you are a paragon of virtue🍼

This is great company to be in, Debbie thanks! Have a blissful rest of the weekend, my friend. 🙏🫵♥️♥️

TY @moberzan.bsky.social 🩵

@thebuttontobutton.bsky.social
@dmansini.bsky.social
@bridgetbactavist.bsky.social
@teekayinusa.bsky.social
@lakeinla.bsky.social
@areyouyesyet.bsky.social
@dragonlady1011.bsky.social
@hopeful66.bsky.social
@schultziepie.bsky.social
@raykwong.bsky.social

Congress needs to get off their asses and reassert their Constitutional power regarding declarations of war. While they’re at it, time to also invoke the 25th amendment.

@dizzyqueenca.bsky.social

That's the last straw. Just cancelled the NYT digital sub.

when it's over—just a shattered sky & a field of debris that could trap us on Earth.

We have a really shitty record when it comes to treaties, saying, "This holds." (Until we say it doesn't.)

And now we're busy doing it to those two that you mentioned.

#DemilitarizeSpace
#SpsceIsNotForSale

investments." (The Artemis Gateway, comms relays, orbital stations, mining tech, potential dual-use military sats positioned to monitor the Moon-Earth corridor.)

If every nation builds weapons to defend against the others, we end up w/Cold War 2.0.
But this time, there's no Berlin Wall to tear down

defense isn't weaponization. But defensive weapons are still weapons.

The bottom line is that international law is clear. No weapons in space, period. Yet now we say, "Oh, that's not a weapon, it's a surveillance platform." "It's just a test module." Or "we need to protect our lunar infrastructure

have: established Space Force (2019) w/explicit defense aims. Launched classified military pay loads under the guise of "comms", advocated for "Cislunar security frameworks (euphemism to expand military reach to the Moon's orbit). Used the term "defensive counterspace operations", trying 2say that

damages caused to Earth or to aircraft. Also applies to damage caused to space due to fault or negligence. So if someone's "dual use" satellite gets trigger-happy or fails & causes a collision? That's an international incident, not just bad PR.

So now despite being signatories, the U.S. & others

outer space. It also mandates that space be used exclusively for peaceful purposes. That includes defensive weaponization. It's clear: no turning space into a battlefield.

1972 Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects holds launching states strictly liable for 4