Typical patterns: Kusaal has dɛɛg "warthog", kukur "pig" (implausible as it may seem, I am fairly sure this is ultimately from Portuguese porco.) Its neighbour Moba, though, has the cognate of dɛɛg, duol, for "pig" and uses mɔduol ("bush pig") for "warthog."

Yes, I reckon so.

The etymon in question normally surfaces as meaning "warthog/phacochère", though in some languages it's become the ordinary word for domestic pig, and "warthog" has to be expressed as "wild/bush pig." Sus scrofa, the wild boar, is not around in those parts.

I omitted the *real* clincher: "millet beer" is also reconstructable to proto-Oti-Volta ...
So too is "wild pig": the map seems to imply 2Ky for "earliest occurrence" of that, which is frankly impossible. Maybe I've misinterpreted it.

Some of the dates on this map look implausibly recent. For example, it's possible to reconstruct words for two distinct cultivars of pearl millet to proto-Oti-Volta; also "grind in a mortar" and "winnow." POV can hardly date from only 2000 years ago (much more internally diverse than e.g. Romance.)

Nieman kan mit gerten
kindes zuht beherten.
den man zêren bringen mac,
dem ist ein wort als ein slac.

Crocodile
Chameleon
Termite
Hippopotamus
Wirebird

Llongyfarchiadau o Abertawe (yng Nghymru)

Certainly "culturally conservative" though: board member of the far-right Alliance for Responsible Citizenship (shareholders: Legatum and Paul Marshall.)

Berber aṃucc "cat": any connection to Hausa mussa "cat"? (Given that a lot of "cat" words seem to be kinda phonaesthetic anyway, I suppose the resemblance could easily be accidental.)

I saw some correspondence on their misclassification of Nabit as a Farefare dialect, from one of the few linguists with an informed opinion on the matter; his proposal was rejected, relying instead on an MA thesis (on Nabit orthography) by an author with no knowlege of the relevant languages at all.

On the plus side, when I last had access to look at the specialised area I know most about (Western Oti-Volta) much of the information was significantly wrong anyway.

To be fair, some tomatoes _are_ pretty disturbing. (No? Just me, then ...)