The Frisc
@thefrisc.bsky.social
2.5K followers 110 following 1.9K posts
Original 💯 San Francisco journalism, nonprofit & passionate about civic issues, holding people accountable, and fighting for a more affordable, inclusive city. Visit: thefrisc.com Newsletter: tinyurl.com/2a9tfkv5 Donate: tinyurl.com/46yvtxak
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
thefrisc.bsky.social
Here's a surefire formula:

Your $ + local journalism = a more informed city.

We can't do this work without your help. Pitch in today with a sustaining monthly donation or one-time give 🙏 the-frisc.fundjournalism.org/support-100-...
the-frisc.fundjournalism.org
thefrisc.bsky.social
🎁 MAKE THESE STORIES HAPPEN: This reporting is powered by donations from our readers and neighbors. Every dollar goes into our work following San Francisco's most important issues. Show your support today! the-frisc.fundjournalism.org/support-100-...
thefrisc.bsky.social
🗞️ FREE NEWSLETTER: Every Wednesday morning and Friday afternoon we send our latest stories + behind-the-scenes context, SF-themed contests, dispatches from City Hall, and more. Get on the list. thefrisc.com/sign-up-for-...
thefrisc.bsky.social
Sherrill's aide steps in to cut off questions, saying the church is going to be mad. (Mad as hell?) So that's it. Thanks for joining us!
thefrisc.bsky.social
Someone asks about the plan helping with, well, everything: schools, transit, etc. Sherrill starts with schools: To stop the enrollment drop and support public schools, we need to build more housing. (He also stumps for voting for higher taxes on the ballot next year to support @sfmta.bsky.social.)
thefrisc.bsky.social
Ah yes - cars. Rachael Tanner takes over for this question. She says builders can still add parking. The difference now is that the city doesn't *require* parking. Some people clap. Some people boo.
thefrisc.bsky.social
Sherrill adds: SB 79 is just another example of complications that the state brings in. He's staying very much on message: Passing this plan will keep the state off our backs. It's a hard choice but it's an important one.
thefrisc.bsky.social
Next Q is about SB 79 and the "exception" - if a city submits an alternative plan to SB 79's upzoning around transit, it doesn't have to follow SB 79 rules. Sherrill says certain areas, especially around @caltrain.com, might work as exception. thefrisc.com/a-hard-won-v...
A ‘Hard-Won Victory’ for More Housing Near Transit. Will SF See Shovels Hit the Dirt?
Recent California and San Francisco bills have stoked plenty of passion but not much construction.
thefrisc.com
thefrisc.bsky.social
Next comment is a reference to the Engardio recall and a veiled threat about "supervisors who don't listen." Sherrill responds: Listening to people doesn't mean doing exactly what everyone wants.
thefrisc.bsky.social
Some background: there's more and more evidence from across the country that building more housing at all income levels can affect prices. Supply and demand works for housing, although there are many skeptics. thefrisc.com/building-mor...
Building More Homes Makes Housing More Affordable. Evidence Grows Stronger Each Year
Research across the U.S. shows that the age-old rule of supply and demand applies, despite some denials. But that doesn’t mean anything goes.
thefrisc.com
thefrisc.bsky.social
Next question gets into the weeds on inclusionary housing. Sherrill says it highlights his biggest concern: we're not guaranteeing affordability. But "this is a step in the right direction."
thefrisc.bsky.social
She also asks: Why is D2 being "targeted" with others having so much open space? Sherrill agrees to some extent - some nabes would do well with more "economic opportunity" - then notes that the blueprint focuses on making richer neighborhoods build their fare share (we're paraphrasing here)
thefrisc.bsky.social
A moment of levity: after someone asks if the state can "veto" SF's plan, someone's dog barks and the crowd applauds
a cartoon dog is barking in front of a pink house .
ALT: a cartoon dog is barking in front of a pink house .
media.tenor.com
thefrisc.bsky.social
Next commenter: we're upzoning for 800K units. (Off by a factor of 10.) She also says let's think less about people who want to move here and more about people who live here now. Sherrill notes many service workers (and firefighters, everyone loves firefighters) can't afford to live here
thefrisc.bsky.social
Sherrill: We'd like more requirements for affordability, but he also realizes that the higher the req's, the harder to build anything. "We need to be serious about new mechanisms to fund affordable housing." Sherrill emphasizes that it's just as expensive to build aff housing as market-rate housing
thefrisc.bsky.social
Next up: a pro-upzoning comment and question how to add incentives to encourage more affordable housing through the inclusionary system.
thefrisc.bsky.social
Sherrill responds: the state density bonus laws probably already allow those kinds of heights in that area, although he's not 100% sure. (Not his district.) The Family Zoning Plan could also allow those heights, but with more sophisticated and sensitive design standards.
thefrisc.bsky.social
We're now on to public comment and Qs. Per our typical practice, we won't record every single one, but note themes and highlights. First: a complaint about "80 foot towers" along the northeast waterfront blocking views -- like his from Russian Hill
thefrisc.bsky.social
In case you missed the flyer earlier, here's the list of properties