@thomaspayne76.bsky.social
What does this have to do with Fox News??
November 12, 2025 at 4:04 PM
What does this have to do with Fox News??
Yeah, I did. I see claims about reducing carbon pollution citing statistics that the public is supposed to believe. And other generalized goals but nothing substantial.
Again, do they deliver tangible benefits that outweigh the cost?
Again, do they deliver tangible benefits that outweigh the cost?
November 11, 2025 at 10:47 PM
Yeah, I did. I see claims about reducing carbon pollution citing statistics that the public is supposed to believe. And other generalized goals but nothing substantial.
Again, do they deliver tangible benefits that outweigh the cost?
Again, do they deliver tangible benefits that outweigh the cost?
Ok... but how? Is there a quantifiable or even qualitative indictor?
November 11, 2025 at 7:11 PM
Ok... but how? Is there a quantifiable or even qualitative indictor?
The question should be: what do these "climate" agencies deliver that actually produces value?
November 11, 2025 at 5:24 PM
The question should be: what do these "climate" agencies deliver that actually produces value?
(sigh)... did you not read the thread? Duffy never said such an absurd thing.
Who in their right mind would suggest that pilots just take off without ATC control? It would be mayhem.
I find it hard to believe you would repost such a thing without at least doing a quick verification.
Who in their right mind would suggest that pilots just take off without ATC control? It would be mayhem.
I find it hard to believe you would repost such a thing without at least doing a quick verification.
November 10, 2025 at 9:02 PM
(sigh)... did you not read the thread? Duffy never said such an absurd thing.
Who in their right mind would suggest that pilots just take off without ATC control? It would be mayhem.
I find it hard to believe you would repost such a thing without at least doing a quick verification.
Who in their right mind would suggest that pilots just take off without ATC control? It would be mayhem.
I find it hard to believe you would repost such a thing without at least doing a quick verification.
... and the mistake being made is to castigate (or make ad hominem attacks) on opposing viewpoints via certain topics simply because others don't accept the narrative or agenda that derive from blind acceptance of "scientists" (or "experts" or any other person with lengthy experience).
November 10, 2025 at 8:39 PM
... and the mistake being made is to castigate (or make ad hominem attacks) on opposing viewpoints via certain topics simply because others don't accept the narrative or agenda that derive from blind acceptance of "scientists" (or "experts" or any other person with lengthy experience).
Can you, and in fact, do you?
What about topics where "the science is settled"? If I've learned anything in life, it's that the "science" is rarely ever "settled".
My point is not that we should ignore the input of science, but rather that scientists can be very biased....
What about topics where "the science is settled"? If I've learned anything in life, it's that the "science" is rarely ever "settled".
My point is not that we should ignore the input of science, but rather that scientists can be very biased....
November 10, 2025 at 8:35 PM
Can you, and in fact, do you?
What about topics where "the science is settled"? If I've learned anything in life, it's that the "science" is rarely ever "settled".
My point is not that we should ignore the input of science, but rather that scientists can be very biased....
What about topics where "the science is settled"? If I've learned anything in life, it's that the "science" is rarely ever "settled".
My point is not that we should ignore the input of science, but rather that scientists can be very biased....
And the fact that you will probably block me says even more (despite the fact that I use no derogatory or profane language).
The hallmark of the modern leftwing progressive is the inability to consider (or tolerate) any viewpoint contrary to their own.
The hallmark of the modern leftwing progressive is the inability to consider (or tolerate) any viewpoint contrary to their own.
November 10, 2025 at 2:21 PM
And the fact that you will probably block me says even more (despite the fact that I use no derogatory or profane language).
The hallmark of the modern leftwing progressive is the inability to consider (or tolerate) any viewpoint contrary to their own.
The hallmark of the modern leftwing progressive is the inability to consider (or tolerate) any viewpoint contrary to their own.
Case in point. But please tell me more about the Enlightened Leftists...
www.youtube.com/shorts/ykea9...
www.youtube.com/shorts/ykea9...
What is a Woman 🤷🏿♀️
YouTube video by Dave the Lawyer
www.youtube.com
November 10, 2025 at 1:42 PM
Case in point. But please tell me more about the Enlightened Leftists...
www.youtube.com/shorts/ykea9...
www.youtube.com/shorts/ykea9...
Just saying, Jeremy, the fact that you used this hoax post to make a point about "right-wing ideology" says a lot.
I will counter with the assertion that leftists abdicate independent thought and logic in favor of whatever "science" or "evidence" supports their larger political agenda.
I will counter with the assertion that leftists abdicate independent thought and logic in favor of whatever "science" or "evidence" supports their larger political agenda.
November 10, 2025 at 1:37 PM
Just saying, Jeremy, the fact that you used this hoax post to make a point about "right-wing ideology" says a lot.
I will counter with the assertion that leftists abdicate independent thought and logic in favor of whatever "science" or "evidence" supports their larger political agenda.
I will counter with the assertion that leftists abdicate independent thought and logic in favor of whatever "science" or "evidence" supports their larger political agenda.
Sin embargo, creo que las mujeres en los EEUU tienen oportunidades mejores que nunca antes en la historia.
November 10, 2025 at 1:31 PM
Sin embargo, creo que las mujeres en los EEUU tienen oportunidades mejores que nunca antes en la historia.
No somos de acuerdo. Creo que si' tenemos derechos en los EEUU. Y Carlin no representa el idea de nuestro Bill of Rights correctamente. De veras, el tuvo un perspectivo incorrecto en varias maneras de vida.
...
...
November 10, 2025 at 1:29 PM
No somos de acuerdo. Creo que si' tenemos derechos en los EEUU. Y Carlin no representa el idea de nuestro Bill of Rights correctamente. De veras, el tuvo un perspectivo incorrecto en varias maneras de vida.
...
...
You could always just delete them and repost without the errors.
November 9, 2025 at 10:47 PM
You could always just delete them and repost without the errors.
Actually, YES. Women today (in the US) have every opportunity and freedom available. It's fact, at least for those who live in the real working world.
November 9, 2025 at 10:45 PM
Actually, YES. Women today (in the US) have every opportunity and freedom available. It's fact, at least for those who live in the real working world.
No, there were already like 3 people tending to him. The president was checking on him. But I suspect nothing can alter your views, so what's the point, right?
November 9, 2025 at 10:43 PM
No, there were already like 3 people tending to him. The president was checking on him. But I suspect nothing can alter your views, so what's the point, right?
That's absurd. You basically want the government to take care of you. How did this generation get so brainwashed into believing this line of thinking?? I don't mean this to be rude, but your perspective IS THE PROBLEM with people today.
November 9, 2025 at 10:42 PM
That's absurd. You basically want the government to take care of you. How did this generation get so brainwashed into believing this line of thinking?? I don't mean this to be rude, but your perspective IS THE PROBLEM with people today.
Nice try, @markhamillofficial.bsky.social .... the video shows the President standing and checking on him.
But sure, post photos without verifying context.
x.com/EdKrassen/st...
But sure, post photos without verifying context.
x.com/EdKrassen/st...
x.com
November 7, 2025 at 9:57 PM
Nice try, @markhamillofficial.bsky.social .... the video shows the President standing and checking on him.
But sure, post photos without verifying context.
x.com/EdKrassen/st...
But sure, post photos without verifying context.
x.com/EdKrassen/st...
Well, look at all the Morally Superior people on this thread. So how many of you are cashing out your savings to send food to these places?
USAID was as huge money-laundering scam.
USAID was as huge money-laundering scam.
November 7, 2025 at 7:53 PM
Well, look at all the Morally Superior people on this thread. So how many of you are cashing out your savings to send food to these places?
USAID was as huge money-laundering scam.
USAID was as huge money-laundering scam.
Hard to believe, considering she's a lunatic moonbat.
November 7, 2025 at 2:50 PM
Hard to believe, considering she's a lunatic moonbat.
Well, maybe the Morally Superior Bluesky (MSB) crowd can each send in money to feed people. Collectively, just the Bluesky echo-chamber population could make a huge financial contribution to feeding people.
November 7, 2025 at 2:48 PM
Well, maybe the Morally Superior Bluesky (MSB) crowd can each send in money to feed people. Collectively, just the Bluesky echo-chamber population could make a huge financial contribution to feeding people.
So... how many of you sent money to food aid charities? You do know, of course, that USAID was just one of MANY charities providing food worldwide.
USAID was largely a scam. It created multiple mini-bureaucracies with virtually ZERO oversight over how US taxpayer dollars were being spent.
USAID was largely a scam. It created multiple mini-bureaucracies with virtually ZERO oversight over how US taxpayer dollars were being spent.
November 7, 2025 at 2:45 PM
So... how many of you sent money to food aid charities? You do know, of course, that USAID was just one of MANY charities providing food worldwide.
USAID was largely a scam. It created multiple mini-bureaucracies with virtually ZERO oversight over how US taxpayer dollars were being spent.
USAID was largely a scam. It created multiple mini-bureaucracies with virtually ZERO oversight over how US taxpayer dollars were being spent.
Ummm.. 2016-2020 was pretty properous, right up until the Chinese let the COVID out.
November 7, 2025 at 2:38 PM
Ummm.. 2016-2020 was pretty properous, right up until the Chinese let the COVID out.
Whoa. This is what you all want. You say life is too expensive... so the companies providing you with "stuff" find cheaper ways to make stuff. Now you complain.
And nobody is stealing your money. You don't have to buy all the electronics, subscriptions and superfluous junk.
And nobody is stealing your money. You don't have to buy all the electronics, subscriptions and superfluous junk.
November 7, 2025 at 2:37 PM
Whoa. This is what you all want. You say life is too expensive... so the companies providing you with "stuff" find cheaper ways to make stuff. Now you complain.
And nobody is stealing your money. You don't have to buy all the electronics, subscriptions and superfluous junk.
And nobody is stealing your money. You don't have to buy all the electronics, subscriptions and superfluous junk.
Stop with the alarmist nonsense. You have no proof of any "climate driven societal collapse." Or perhaps you think the problems in western society today are somehow new?
November 7, 2025 at 1:08 PM
Stop with the alarmist nonsense. You have no proof of any "climate driven societal collapse." Or perhaps you think the problems in western society today are somehow new?
Please, just stop. You talk as though division and strife is some new phenomenon. But sure, let's pin this on "climate change" as a basis for creating a whole new scam whereby elitist climate "experts" decide who pays what, enriching themselves, and without really changing anything. No thanks.
November 7, 2025 at 1:05 PM
Please, just stop. You talk as though division and strife is some new phenomenon. But sure, let's pin this on "climate change" as a basis for creating a whole new scam whereby elitist climate "experts" decide who pays what, enriching themselves, and without really changing anything. No thanks.