Thank you for sharing this. As the dad of an 11yo as well, one who is at this very moment doing her 2nd community theater audition after not being picked the first time, I appreciate the chance to step back and think about how we think about rehearsal.

I understand, thanks for explaining. This makes sense—you’re also hitting on the differences that emerge when different levels of expertise are brought to bear on the outputs in specific uses.

I mean, sure, just straight up output. But what about AI assisted writing?

Costco out here beings better civic guardian than the elected leaders here in #memphis

I’m didn’t click, but that’s because the question seems unnecessarily reductive

Haha. Nope. Bad data

God giving strong Turnitin vibes too

Wowzers

I feel pretty good about how we’re doing it at the UofM

Yes he is!

Thank you!

It’s more that I wish more educators like this writer would distinguish between the companies that grab the headlines and the literacy work that we do. I am neither pro nor anti-AI, I certainly don’t condemn it; I see its value in the work that I do as an educator and I want others to as well.

As someone who helped found an applied AI program and is an administrator on our uni’s AI research lab, I wish more humanities teachers would recognize that we are the ones best equipped to run and teach in these programs.

And in the process makes his “thinking” even dumber by turning it into zeros and ones 🤣

Yes. Bonkers.

Also, ditch, your paper CV and make an open access Google doc.