Scholar

Adam D. Dixon

H-index: 31
Business 45%
Economics 41%
adamdixon.bsky.social
Last I checked there was an election in November and millions of people voted.
adamdixon.bsky.social
🚨 **Quick Take on the New U.S. Sovereign Wealth Fund** 🚨

An executive order for a U.S. sovereign wealth fund was announced *yesterday*. What does it mean?

I shared my thoughts on BBC Radio Newshour—tune in from the **38-minute mark

(www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/...)
Newshour - China announces retaliatory tariffs on some American goods - BBC Sounds
China hits back at Donald Trump with tariffs on US
www.bbc.co.uk
adamdixon.bsky.social
The sole criteria for ERC is (or at least was) scientific excellence.
adamdixon.bsky.social
A bit faster than you Brett, but not by much!!! 😁

Reposted by Adam D. Dixon

iliasalami.bsky.social
Your holiday season read is here! The Spectre of State Capitalism is free to download: academic.oup.com/book/57552
adamdixon.bsky.social
WSJ op-ed pages have been consistently skeptical and critical of Trump, and was so during the campaign.
adamdixon.bsky.social
Agreed. My concern is the over-conflation of climate change at the expense of other explanations that are more important and can be addressed more easily at source. I'm not making an argument for ignoring climate change.
adamdixon.bsky.social
So climate change caused Russia to invade Ukraine? To be clear: I do not discount the effects of climate change. But there are other more significant causal factors.
adamdixon.bsky.social
So Russia invaded Ukraine because of climate change? By conflating climate change with just about everything, we make the problem much harder to solve.
adamdixon.bsky.social
No, that's not my point. It's how proximate it is as a cause. It's fine to claim that climate change is a driving force of .... but by how much? And to be clear, I see climate change as a problem to solve.
adamdixon.bsky.social
My issue is the risk of attributing problems to climate change when the actual cause is something else (e.g., building more and more houses in hurricane prone areas).
adamdixon.bsky.social
But it's still not clear to me where climate change is causing geopolitical disruption.
adamdixon.bsky.social
Where is evidence that climate change is a primary causal factor in geopolitical instability? Is instability in say Ukraine/Russia a climate change issue, or is instability in the Levant because of climate change?
adamdixon.bsky.social
Climate change is given too much prominence as a causal factor. Most of these issues have more significant proximate causes. Conflating climate change with every challenge we face isn't helpful. And we must address climate change.
adamdixon.bsky.social
What geopolitical chaos is caused by climate change? That's not clear from the article. Geopolitical tensions have much more proximate causes -- climate change not being one of them. Conflating climate change with every political and social challenge is unhelpful.
adamdixon.bsky.social
Ilias, I'd like to confirm that I've read and am now responding to your post. Bluesky is underwhelming so far. But then again, I was never good at the whole twitter thing. I go days without opening. Algorithms don't care for people like me.
adamdixon.bsky.social
What does build public power from the get go mean? I agree with @brettchristophers.bsky.social in the main that public utilities are a sound long-term option. But such a build out will entail all kinds of private actors. And most countries these days would farm out operations.
adamdixon.bsky.social
Successive generations of academics typically want to think they've discovered a topic few if any have written on before.
adamdixon.bsky.social
@brettchristophers.bsky.social I don't think Tooze is right about the US. Have a listen/watch the latest episode of the podcast with Aniket Shah: youtu.be/oYVKG2K_2sk?.... We mention you Brett!!! Trump doesn't spell the end of decarbonization in the US.
China may have already won the green innovation race
YouTube video by Adam Smith's Panmure House
youtu.be
adamdixon.bsky.social
🌍 Is the West Losing the Green Tech Race to China?
In the latest New Enlightenment Podcast, Aniket Shah and I discuss this and what Trump means for US climate policy. 🎙️Listen on Spotify, Apple, or YouTube:
🔗 spoti.fi/3XGc7pT | apple.co/3AVJbkT | lnkd.in/eTfYv4Pu
#ClimatePolicy #EnergyTransition
adamdixon.bsky.social
Having a large-scale battery manufacturing in Europe, especially in northern Sweden where green energy is cheap, is still a good idea and still possible. This isn't a failure of green industrial policy, it is a failure of 'economic (EU perhaps) economic nationalism.
adamdixon.bsky.social
I don't think this will dent the green transition very much. A start-up in a mature industry. China, Japan, and South Korea will sell Europe the batteries it needs.
adamdixon.bsky.social
I'm not on Truth Social, but I'd like to see it merge with @bsky.app. I like to see what different groups think...

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m