Spiego il perché nella parte finale (min 17:30) di questa bella puntata di Presa Diretta.
www.raiplay.it/video/2025/1...
Reposted by Giacomo Grassi
#AGWdeniers
@giacgrassi.bsky.social e @caserinik.bsky.social fanno a polpette il rapporto dei 5 negaioli per il DOE. Sono stati più veloci del solito, ma gli argomenti di quei "mercanti di dubbi... sono già stati più volte confutati anche su Climalteranti."
💡 It is crucial that future #GlobalStocktakes include comparisons between modeled and country-provided net land-use emissions.
2/
🖋️ A new paper led by Rosa Roman-Cuesta explores this question and offers a way forward.
🌲 The study finds that land use makes up a quarter of global 2030 mitigation pledges — mostly reliant on external support.
rdcu.be/eydhU
1/
by Giacomo Grassi — Reposted by Glen P. Peters
How science can help reversing this trend?
A perspective paper in Nature discusses these questions, highlighting the importance to better monitor forest resources and their resilience.
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
7/7
Policymakers need to grasp these implications and adjust their climate ambition accordingly
6/7
Key takeaways: under inventory definitions, the remaining carbon budget is smaller—and reaching net-zero CO₂ alone is not enough to stop warming.
5/7
Our Comment explains why this is a crucial step forward.
4/7
Reconciling them is key for aligning global models, national inventories, and Earth observation — ultimately building trust in land-use emission estimates.
3/7
This disconnect has led to a 7 billion-tonne annual gap in CO₂ estimates from land use—equivalent to 20% of global fossil CO₂ emissions—causing confusion among scientists and policymakers
2/7
Land carbon removals are key on the path to net-zero.
Yet, confusion exists on what “anthropogenic” land-use C fluxes are.
#LULUCF #IPCC #ParisAgreement
1/7
We discussed challenges in GHG reporting and the decline of forest carbon sinks in Europe.
Agenda/presentations: lnkd.in/dkJNxSWE
It’s a sign of ideological hostility to everything that involves a multilateral dialogue and cooperation.
If you ignore climate change, climate change will not ignore you.
by Katharine Hayhoe — Reposted by Giacomo Grassi, Peter A. Stott, Nicole Boivin , and 16 more Giacomo Grassi, Peter A. Stott, Nicole Boivin, Gunnar Luderer, Kornelis Blok, Chris Smith, Tatiana Ilyina, Roland Séférian, Sharon A. Robinson, Christoph Scherber, Lauren B. Buckley, Olaf Weber, Tanya Heikkila, Xin Zhao, Jan Christoph Steckel, William F. Lamb, Meaghan Daly, Cyril Masselot, Sylvia Karlsson‐Vinkhuyzen
More by @afreedma.bsky.social here:
www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/mtdoc...
Dopo l'ottima spiegazione di Elisa Palazzi, discuto cosa significhi “net-zero”, e perché stimare gli assorbimenti di CO2 da parte delle foreste è particolarmente complicato.
www.raiplaysound.it/audio/2025/0...
by Sonia I. Seneviratne — Reposted by Giacomo Grassi, Piers M. Forster, Roland Séférian
Useful to remember that national GHG inventories use a definition of anthropogenic sinks which is different from climate models (and from this post).
This has important implications for net-zero goals and warming projections, e.g.
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
A dialogue has started to reconcile different estimates. Two recent analyses offer complementary views:
-IPCC Expert Meeting www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/mtdoc...
-Allen et al. 2024 www.nature.com/articles/s41...