Daniel Rice
@danielrice.bsky.social
3.2K followers 730 following 150 posts
Law prof @ UNC-Chapel Hill. Con Law and Indian Law. Bio: https://law.unc.edu/people/daniel-rice/ SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1684746
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
danielrice.bsky.social
you had anything left to learn about the mind of the South?
danielrice.bsky.social
I'm no LeBron James, but sciatica has (seemingly permanently) eliminated my ability to do more than walk a couple of miles or feebly jog. I'd be very surprised if he comes back in full form.
theathletic.com
NEWS: LeBron James will miss the start of the Lakers' season due to sciatica on his right side, the team announced.

He will be re-evaluated in 3-4 weeks.
danielrice.bsky.social
Here's to hoping the federal posse comitatus power stays buried...
danielrice.bsky.social
The sequence appears to be: (1) "All flag burners should be incarcerated"; (2) EO prioritizing the prosecution of flag burners who cause noncommunicative harms (because doctrine); and (3) "No, I'm actually demanding that literally everyone who burns a flag be imprisoned."
paleofuture.bsky.social
Trump calls for ICE and other cops to enforce his executive order banning flag burning, something that’s blatantly unconstitutional given Texas v Johnson (1989), which established flag burning as protected speech.
To ICE, Border Patrol, Law Enforcement, and all U.S. Military: As per my August 25, 2025
Executive Order, please be advised that, from this point forward, anybody burning the American Flag will be subject to one year in prison. You will be immediately arrested. Thank you for your attention to this matter!
5 ReTruths 32 Likes
10/3/25, 4:26 PM
danielrice.bsky.social
new frontiers in compelled speech
veenadubal.bsky.social
“Some furloughed workers at the Dept of Education expressed shock…to find that their out-of-office email messages had been changed without their knowledge to reflect the Trump administration’s view that the government shutdown was the fault of “Democrat Senators.””

www.nytimes.com/2025/10/02/u...
Partisan Language Inserted Into Education Dept. Workers’ Automated Emails
www.nytimes.com
Reposted by Daniel Rice
jameeljaffer.bsky.social
A series of short posts from leading scholars about the constraints the First Amendment imposes on the government's authority to impose conditions on federal funding. Seems relevant! This is a @knightcolumbia.org series from earlier this year. knightcolumbia.org/research/fed...
Federal Funding and the First Amendment
knightcolumbia.org
danielrice.bsky.social
Toddler’s first no-nap day. Help.
Reposted by Daniel Rice
jostler.bsky.social
This man is ignorant. Wounded Knee was a massacre, not a battle.
danielrice.bsky.social
Not many basketball camps come with a disclaimer of state action!
Women’s Clinic – Arkansas Basketball
danielrice.bsky.social
Will give this advice to my research assistants
Reposted by Daniel Rice
heidikitrosser.bsky.social
Nothing is more central to a free society than the right to criticize one’s government. Nothing.
danielrice.bsky.social
Thread
profadamszimmerman.bsky.social
1. My 9-11 story. On September 11, I was clerking for Judge Jack B.Weinstein—a legendary jurist, scholar and person—who also happened to have an unobstructed view of the World Trade Center from the Brooklyn federal courthouse.
danielrice.bsky.social
Trying to imagine what the Justice Douglas book tours would have been like!
danielrice.bsky.social
I like how you're a professional blogger, but you blog only grudgingly and when you see absolutely no other option
danielrice.bsky.social
Here's to hoping for a Gobitis —> Barnette mood shift. Too bad it'll likely require extraordinary suffering.
stevevladeck.bsky.social
#BREAKING: With no explanation (save for a solo concurrence by Justice Kavanaugh), #SCOTUS has frozen lower-court rulings that had enjoined allegedly suspicion-less arrests as part of "roving" immigration patrols in California.

Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justices Kagan and Jackson, dissents:
www.supremecourt.gov
Reposted by Daniel Rice
williambaude.bsky.social
Sincerely wondering: what remedies does Justice Kavanaugh believe are and should be available in federal court these days for excessive force violations by federal immigration officials?
danielrice.bsky.social
the classic designated public forum.
danielrice.bsky.social
saw a DRINKING COW MILK in Durham the other day!
danielrice.bsky.social
‘’The Supreme Court’s Two Bodies’’
chrisgeidner.bsky.social
BREAKING: On a 2-1 vote, D.C. Circuit denies the Trump administration's request to let Trump fire a Federal Trade commissioner during appeals.

Citing Humphrey's Executor, about the FTC: "To grant a stay would be to defy the Supreme Court's decisions that bind our judgments. That we will not do."
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
No. 25-5261
September Term, 2025
President Trump fired Federal Trade Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter without cause. The district court ordered her reinstatement. The government now seeks a stay of that decision pending appeal. That motion must be denied. The government has no likelihood of success on appeal given controlling and directly on point Supreme Court precedent. Specifically, ninety years ago, a unanimous Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Federal Trade Commission Act's for-cause removal protection for Federal Trade Commissioners. See Humphrey's Executor v. United States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935). Over the ensuing decades-and fully informed of the substantial executive power exercised by the Commission-the Supreme Court has repeatedly and expressly left Humphrey's Executor in place, and so precluded Presidents from removing Commissioners at will. Then just four months ago, the Supreme Court stated that adherence to extant precedent like Humphrey's Executor controls in resolving stay motions.
To grant a stay would be to defy the Supreme Court's decisions that bind our judgments. That we will not do.