@dugongsugong.bsky.social
25 followers 42 following 380 posts
I am not American, so my observations on its politics will be limited and often wrong. Apologies. 33 year old male. Have a good day.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
I apologize. I had assumed there was a more recent political loss that I wasn't aware of. The past few days I tried to not focus so much on the political news of the US but to focus more on my own country news, so I thought I missed a big political news.
Indonesia (that red spot above Australia) has a tradition of dukun (shaman, maybe) who can give you special needle treatment to make you beautiful and alluring. It is a common secret in this allegedly Islamic country that lots of popular celebrities and politicians get the treatment.
Got it. Every time I use ChatGPT I will begin by asking "but first, how do you feel today, Chat?" to gain rapport.
Wait wait, what do you mean you 'lost on this'? What happened?
Thanks for the explanation.

So really the 'fairness' here is maintained by other businesses trying to stay competitive instead of some regulatory body, huh.
I know not a single cool girl that wouldn't melt if horses complimented them.
"Boltzmann and Ehrenfest, on the introduction" when you're short on time
Not an economist here: how do we know if the keystone pricing is fair? that is, do we know that 2.2-2.5x multiplier is the lowest possible multiplier? What if it turns out eg 1.7x multiplier is enough for a profit, but the store wanted to increase their profits? Thank you.
LLM stands for "Looks Like Magic", right?
Speaking as an outsider, there seems to be very little the Democratic Party can do if they win the Presidency to prevent MAGA-like movements? I was under the impression that a trifecta in 2029 is unlikely, and without a good majority, the future Dem pres can't do much to keep the reactionaries down?
Boss gets gunned, my folks become grime
This is why I cower, on company time
"In reality, however, it is quite otherwise with you:
while you pretend to read with rapture
the canon of your law in Nature,
you want something quite the contrary,
you extraordinary
stage-players,
and self-deluders"

Love the rhymes here!
cursing and getting angry because the stream freezes a bit
scalehelix.net
guy stuck at the mariners game watching it on his phone
Reposted
djangowexler.bsky.social
My boss: so how's our fourth quarter looking?

Me, the sales manager at the company that makes inflatable frog suits: well, you're never going to believe this, but
And anything not covered is subsumed within the symbology of the Bible!

Thus all you need to represent anything is a huge snake with maybe a small bibgle
not sure why in this time of tragedy i should stop jerking off the clown half-way. no, the clown will have his full mast
even the "I Survived Being Forced to Read 'I Survived' Book Series by Lauren Tarshis, 2025" book?
Genuine Q: Surely the display of humanity is the actual cooking? Yes, having ChatGPT make the recipes is lazy, but if someone actually followed the recipe (modifying it if it asks for something physically impossible) and made an actual meal, there's nothing wrong or dehumanizing about that, no?
Genuine question: how would you behave in the inevitable cloud of diverging beliefs on AI consciousness, then? Do you lean more towards treating them as conscious, or not?

I am very confused and would like to hear others' views.
Excerpt from chapter 12 of the draft of AI and Consciousness, by Eric Schwitzgebel.

Over time, we will reinterpret our uncertain science and philosophy through the new social lenses we construct – perhaps with the help of these AI systems themselves.  We will prefer certain interpretations.  Lovers of AI companions might yearn to see their partners as genuinely conscious.  Exploiters of AI tools might prefer to regard their systems as nonconscious artifacts.  More complex motivations and relationships will also emerge, including ones we cannot currently conceptualize.

Tenuous science will bend to these motivations.  We will favor the theories that support our social preferences.  Even when scientific consensus speaks clearly against our preferences, systems can be redesigned to make the evidence conveniently ambiguous.  If the leading theories say, for example, that recurrence and self-representation are necessary for consciousness, designers who seek consciousness attribution can add enough recurrence and self-representation to escape easy refutation.  Designers seeking instead to deny consciousness can ensure their systems differ enough in material and function to count as nonconscious on some reasonable theories, which then become their favorite theories.

The result: We will think we have solved the problem of AI consciousness, even if we have not.
There was once a position above the pope, called the Poope. But then the cardinals who don't like it start calling it the Poop (very rude!) and so the final Poope (Poope Head) abolished his own position. Very sad.
*woke economist, or 'woconomist'*: i think you'll find racism provides very low returns
Some farmers are going to break and at their lowest moment will cry to the heavens, "why are the democrats doing this?"
That liberal pope, I can't stand him, especially when he follows the teachings of that goddang criminal hippie *checks notes* Jesus Christ
I'm trying to compare tsukumogami, which are household items that gains life if it remains unbroken for a century, with golems, soil that are shaped and given life by human magic and how that relates to two different conceptions of life/soul but oh god I'm not smart enough :(
In a couple of days those signs will somehow aggregate and coagulate into a humanoid monster named Insignia that Batman has to fight