Elise Cutts
@elisecutts.bsky.social
1.1K followers 1.3K following 1.6K posts
Science journalist is just a fancy way of saying "professional nerd." USian in Austria, language geek, collector of fine yellow zigzagged sweaters and etymology fun facts. Get my newsletter about big questions in science: www.reviewertoo.com 👽🌀🦋
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
elisecutts.bsky.social
Now I want to know what the spookiest possible celestial body is, haha.
elisecutts.bsky.social
And of course there's the Van Gogh painting visible-wavelengths look, a classic.

Image: NASA/ESA/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA/M.H. Wong and I. de Pater (UC Berkeley) et al.
Acknowledgments: M. Zamani
Jupiter the way you imagine it: red and white striped, big red spot, lots of little storms, just a dazzlingly beautiful space orb.
elisecutts.bsky.social
Radio Jupiter is dressed up as... a bee?

Imagge: ALMA (ESO/NAOJ/NRAO), I. de Pater et al.; NRAO/AUI NSF, S. Dagnello
A radio telescope image of Jupiter that basically just looks like a striped marble. The stripes are red and yellow and there's a big black stripe down the middle. No red spots or storms in sight.
elisecutts.bsky.social
UV just at the poles can add an aurora hat to any costume.

Credit: NASA / ESA / J. Nichols (University of Leicester)
A visible wavelength image of Jupiter looking classic with its red and white stripes and great red spot, but with a swirling purple-ish aurora on the north pole.
elisecutts.bsky.social
Ultraviolet Jupiter is dressed up as an oil slick or an opal, depends on how edgy it's feeling when you ask.

Image: NASA, ESA, M. Wong (University of California - Berkeley), G. Kober (NASA/Catholic University of America)
A composite UV wavelength Hubble telescope picture of Jupiter looking PSYCHADELIC with cotton-candy pinks and blues everywhere and a great BLUE spot instead of a red one.
elisecutts.bsky.social
Different wavelengths ranges are... Halloween costumes for planets?

IR Jupiter is a pumpkin, a classic if maybe a little low-effort spooky look. (1/n) 🧪🔭
drfunkyspoon.bsky.social
Since spooky season is here: Jupiter in the infrared looking like an angry red pumpkin planet.
(Square-root-enhanced images of Jupiter's thermal emission from cloud tops at 5.1 microns from NASA's Infrared Telescope Facility in October 2020)
🧪
elisecutts.bsky.social
I don't know how we could ever transcend story or what a "simple reality" would look like without one, honestly. Arguably scientific theories are stories that that explain data. Collecting observations without theorizing wouldn't be very helpful for predicting things about the universe.
elisecutts.bsky.social
I've come around to thinking it's preferable to provide a least-wrong story than to provide no story at all. Because if you don't tell a story, someone else will.
elisecutts.bsky.social
Given the storytelling instinct, I actually think there's a danger in ~avoiding~ storytelling language in science communication. Scientists can't just present facts and expect people to receive them neutrally. Narrative abhors a vacuum.
elisecutts.bsky.social
If you walk on the beach, there's clearly no perfect boundary separating land and sea.

But if you want to draw a map of the beach for someone else, you'll need to draw a line somewhere — preferably somewhere reasonable.

Even if we have to write fictions, we can do our best to write true ones.
elisecutts.bsky.social
The frontier of science — especially in speculative fields — is a beach, not a cliff. There's no fine line between the known and unknown. Are you in the ocean once you're standing on wet sand? Does it only count once you're up to your ankles in the surf? Up to your knees?
elisecutts.bsky.social
More specifically, this post argues that our drive to turn everything into a story essentially guarantees that we'll fall for illusions of consensus — false impressions that scientists agree, even if they don't.

I think this is sort of inevitable, even if care is taken to communicate nuance.
elisecutts.bsky.social
This week's newletter is out. And as a science journalist, I maybe... hate it? It's always fun to convince yourself of something you don't want to be true.

It's all about the storytelling instinct and how it has some uncomfortable implications for science communication.

Take a read:
True Fictions
The storytelling instinct conjures illusions of consensus in science
www.reviewertoo.com
elisecutts.bsky.social
What are your favorite portrayals of the origin of life in popular media?

Mine is probably this one from Star Trek: TNG, but only because it involves Q. He's so great he can overwhelm my usual distaste for primordial soup.
Earth, 3.5 Billion Years Ago
YouTube video by April 5, 2063
www.youtube.com
elisecutts.bsky.social
If Google Scholar could just... you know, create RSS feeds for following researchers instead of needing to use their clunky email alerts, that'd sure be swell...
elisecutts.bsky.social
Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin!
elisecutts.bsky.social
While it still makes me nervous sometimes, I'm starting to like writing without the security blanket of a copywriter on my blog because at least it's obvious I'm not a computer. There are too many stupid typos and clunky phrases for that lol
elisecutts.bsky.social
I feel like I need an xkcd comic to teach me the proper terminology or something
elisecutts.bsky.social
Splotch is the word I didn't know I needed for describing astronomy things, thank you haha
Reposted by Elise Cutts
artemyte.bsky.social
After a long time in the making, my paper on nonequilibrium thermodynamics of Darwinian evolution has been published in Philosophical Transactions B. Updated version: arxiv.org/abs/2112.02809
Reposted by Elise Cutts
seanmcarroll.bsky.social
After stretching a bit last year, this year the Nobel committee was determined to give the prize to the physicsiest physics that ever physicsed.
nytimes.com
Breaking News: The Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to John Clarke, Michel Devoret and John Martinis for their work in quantum mechanics.
Nobel Prize in Physics Is Awarded for Work in Quantum Physics
The prize was awarded to John Clarke, Michel H. Devoret and John M. Martinis.
nyti.ms
elisecutts.bsky.social
Now I'm never going to be able to un-see this as a kind of karma for the AI Nobel lol.
elisecutts.bsky.social
I'm uh, just going to leave this here...

(I think this time it's a magnitude 6.2, btw)
elisecutts.bsky.social
Oh wow. It's even with the same 2 spots psychologist he's been co-authoring the Loeb Scale etc. papers with.

Thanks.