Lightnews — Scholar-powered news

Jessica Lovering @lovering.bsky.social · 1d

We’re on a spot price electricity plan in Sweden, which is great because I finally got my husband to geek out over energy prices. Now he says stuff like, ”It’s going to be really windy tomorrow, we should do laundry.”

18

Reposted by Jessica Lovering

MC Hammond @mchammond.bsky.social · 1d

🚨New nuclear tech alert! So proud of the DISA and Pillsbury teams for getting this license. This game changing process will revolutionize the ability to treat over 15,000 abandoned uranium mining sites in the west including many on the lands of the Navajo Nation. www.pillsburylaw.com/en/news-and-...

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman

Across the western U.S., more than 15,000 Cold War–era abandoned uranium mine waste sites remain—many of which are located on or near tribal lands—posing long-standing environmental and health risks. ...

www.pillsburylaw.com

1 2

Jessica Lovering @lovering.bsky.social · 1d

Just totally normal times we're living in...

www.theguardian.com/world/2025/o...

Headline from online news site The Guardian that says: "Norway braces for Trump's reaction if he does not win Nobel peace prize. US president may impose tariffs, demand higher Nato contributions or even declare Norway an enemy, analyst says"

1 5

Jessica Lovering @lovering.bsky.social · 2d

Sounds like we have a deal!

The Verge @theverge.com · May 26

Nick Clegg says asking artists for use permission would ‘kill’ the AI industry

Paul McCartne, Elton John and others signed an open letter.

buff.ly

1 4

Jessica Lovering @lovering.bsky.social · 9d

I said the study was good, but the design was flawed by today’s standards, even if it had been published! But for a lot of these other links, the published studies rely on bad statistical methods and are not well-controlled

Jessica Lovering @lovering.bsky.social · 9d

But that’s an example of a good study, albeit still flawed by today’s standards. RFK Jr. isn’t uncovering hidden studies like that, his reports cited totally fabricated studies! Yes, our understanding of nutrition evolves over time. But people believe lots of things now based on junk science

1

Jessica Lovering @lovering.bsky.social · 9d

In well-controlled studies, what looks like an effect from reduction in seed oils or ultra-processed foods is actually just less calories. You are very much proving my point with your, ”I don’t need science, I have my personal anecdote” 😀

1 1

Jessica Lovering @lovering.bsky.social · 9d

There *are* lots of people who want to restrict seed oils or put warnings on fructose, etc. And that’s not based on good nutritional science. That’s all I’m saying!

1

Jessica Lovering @lovering.bsky.social · 9d

No one is denying anyone anything. But to say this decision is based on science is just not true. The studies are not well-designed.

1

Jessica Lovering @lovering.bsky.social · 9d

This is not about personal choice at all. I was talking about people coting junk scientific studies to support policy changes. The studies saying seed oils are bad for you aren’t much better than Tylenol causes autism in their quality

1

Jessica Lovering @lovering.bsky.social · 9d

So, I think everyone in my social feeds was rightfully mocking the tylenol-autism link, without really grasping that it's the exact same kind of poorly-designed studies behind a lot of the links they do still believe. It may not have the same harms, because tylenol is a harm reduction tool, but...

Tamar Haspel @tamarhaspel.bsky.social · 9d

If you think high-fructose corn syrup is worse than sugar, or artificial sweeteners are harmful, or genetically modified foods are bad for you, or organic vegetables are better for you, you're engaging in the same kind of evidence-blindness that RFK Jr. is.

Not at the same scale! But same idea.

1 3 19

Jessica Lovering @lovering.bsky.social · 9d

These are my only pets at the moment…

Toddler and baby sucking their thumbs on the floor

Toddler and baby sucking their thumbs in bed

6

Jessica Lovering @lovering.bsky.social · 16d

Tak! Men vi introducerer ikke begrebet LUIE. Denne artikel er fra PLOS One et årti tidligere: journals.plos.org/plosone/arti...

Energy Sprawl or Energy Efficiency: Climate Policy Impacts on Natural Habitat for the United States of America

Concern over climate change has led the U.S. to consider a cap-and-trade system to regulate emissions. Here we illustrate the land-use impact to U.S. habitat types of new energy development resulting ...

journals.plos.org

1 1

Jessica Lovering @lovering.bsky.social · 16d

Hmmm, is nuclear generation shrinking? 2024 generation was higher than the previous few years, and 2025 expected to be higher with Vogtle-4 online.

Jessica Lovering @lovering.bsky.social · 16d

That's great! But hard to distill that into a simple metric when you are aggregating across thousands of projects, some are net positive and some net negative for the landscape.

3

Jessica Lovering @lovering.bsky.social · 17d

Sorry, was *not* to provide a conclusive final number

1

Jessica Lovering @lovering.bsky.social · 17d

The point of this paper was to provide a conclusive final number, i.e. this is how much land each technology needs. But to provide a range to community planners and policy-makers to help them in their local decision-making. They will have a much better sense of what type of land is being impacted

1 2

Jessica Lovering @lovering.bsky.social · 17d

Yes! Dams are used for lots of things! One choice we had to make with the data is we only looked at dams where the primary purpose was electricity production. There were many more dams where the primary purpose was flood control, or irrigation...and they also made some electricity

1

Jessica Lovering @lovering.bsky.social · 17d

That's why we included the rooftop solar metric, so that you can see. The reality is that most utility-scale solar doesn't do anything with the land underneath; it would be difficult to, and a majority of the solar is large-scale, ground-mounted. But we have both metrics, because both are useful!

1 2

Jessica Lovering @lovering.bsky.social · 17d

We calculated both footprint and spacing, because both are useful metrics of impact on landscape. Sure, the land between wind turbines *can* be used for agriculture, if they are on agricultural land. But if they are in a sensitive wildlife area, you want to know the full extent

4

Jessica Lovering @lovering.bsky.social · 18d

There are some good ones that look at types of ecosystems impacted:
journals.plos.org/plosone/arti...

Energy Sprawl or Energy Efficiency: Climate Policy Impacts on Natural Habitat for the United States of America

Concern over climate change has led the U.S. to consider a cap-and-trade system to regulate emissions. Here we illustrate the land-use impact to U.S. habitat types of new energy development resulting ...

journals.plos.org

1 2

Jessica Lovering @lovering.bsky.social · 18d

We talk about that in the paper, but it's very hard to incorporate something like that into a metric as it will be different for every project and landscape. Utility-scale solar projects can greatly disturb the land, or not. We tried to capture this by including rooftop solar metric & wind footprint

1 2

Jessica Lovering @lovering.bsky.social · 18d

So, agree we shouldn't ignore the land used by extractive industries, but there is a metric to compare this apples-to-apples: land use intensity of energy (or electricity). We did a meta-analysis for electricity production if you are interested! journals.plos.org/plosone/arti...

Land-use intensity of electricity production and tomorrow’s energy landscape

The global energy system has a relatively small land footprint at present, comprising just 0.4% of ice-free land. This pales in comparison to agricultural land use– 30–38% of ice-free land–yet future ...

journals.plos.org

4 7 31

Jessica Lovering @lovering.bsky.social · 18d

Ugh, this is the worst. When we moved to Europe I thought we would take trains everywhere (and we do try to!), but for work trips it is often 2-3x the cost and takes 5-6x longer. The extra time is not so bad on vacation, but for a family of four that cost is tough to bear

European Greens @europeangreens.eu · 18d

😢 How are flights so much cheaper than trains?
Indeed, why are we forced to pick between cheap & polluting and expensive & sustainable?

Well @greenpeace.eu has the answer: subsidies and MASSIVE tax breaks.

A bright green poster with bold white and pink text at the top: “TRAINS ARE TOO OFTEN MORE EXPENSIVE THAN FLIGHTS.” Below it reads: “Sustainable travel shouldn’t be a luxury.” A color-coded map of Europe shows the proportion of cross-border train routes that are more expensive than flights for the same journey. Colors: green (0–20%), yellow (20–40%), orange (40–60%), red (60–80%), purple (80–100%). For example, Spain, Portugal, and the UK are shaded purple (80–100%), while countries like Poland and Czechia are shaded green (0–20%). At the bottom, source text reads: “Greenpeace, Ticket Prices Of Planes Vs Trains, 2025. Only countries for which at least 4 cross-border routes met the methodological criteria are included in the Scorecard.”

Green background with bold text: “WHY ARE TRAINS MORE EXPENSIVE THAN PLANES?” Below is a comparison table with icons of a plane and a train at the top. Two rows:
VAT on international travel: Plane = “NO” (pink), Train = “YES” (yellow).
Kerosene/energy tax: Plane = “NO” (pink), Train = “YES” (yellow).
The chart highlights that flights avoid taxes trains must pay. Source: Greenpeace, Ticket Prices Of Planes Vs Trains, 2025.

5

Jessica Lovering @lovering.bsky.social · 19d

You free tomorrow? Come see me (virtually) at NYC Climate Week: www.climateweeknyc.org/events/role-...

The Role of Nuclear Energy in Decarbonization and Powering the AI Era | Climate Week

As nations target to meet net-zero goals, nuclear energy is reemerging as an essential — and often controversial — part of the clean energy mix. At the same time, the rapid rise of artificial intellig...

www.climateweeknyc.org

4