Michael A. Lewis
banner
michaelalewis10.bsky.social
Michael A. Lewis
@michaelalewis10.bsky.social

Sociologist/social worker also interested in stats, economics, and philosophy . Opinions mine, not my employer’s. Website: https://sites.google.com/view/prof-michael-a-lewis/

Michael Steven Lewis-Beck is an American political scientist and the F. Wendell Miller Distinguished Professor of Political Science at the University of Iowa. His research focuses on comparative politics, political forecasting, and political methodology. .. more

Political science 57%
Philosophy 7%

Thanks from us social scientists who’re trying to be philosophically informed.

If I end up doing that, we’ll talk. Hope you’re as well as one can be these days.

Dreams is one of my favorite movies. My Japanese in-laws tell me it’s because I’m honorary Japanese. 😊

Yeah, I’ve heard about that approach.

Very helpful!

Yeah, I've thought about oral exams too, but they are tougher with larger classes.

response to an objection is, deductive vs. inductive arguments, etc. This would replace the required analytical essays. I'm wondering what you philosopher types think of this idea. @karlwiderquist.bsky.social @kevinzollman.com @etvpod.bsky.social

idea. I'm not teaching this year, but when I return I'm considering giving students a multiple choice test that would require them to respond to written analytical essays. The questions would be designed to require them to apply concepts such as argument, premise, conclusion, objection, what a

Question for you philosophers (or kindred spirits). When I teach I emphasize critical thinking and so have required students to write analytical essays of the kind that, as I understand it, are often required in philosophy courses. With ChatGpt and similar around, that may no longer be the best

Good piece. Also, if AI becomes as disruptive to the labor market as some argue it will (or already is), I wonder if that will affect people’s commitment to the job ethic.

I looked around and found this from some time in the 1970s. Please excuse the shirt; it was the 1970s. 😀

I had one of those in about 1979. 😊

Wow, I had never heard of this game until now!

Michael A. Lewis‬
‪@michaelalewis10.bsky.social‬
· 1h
What I should've also mentioned in the piece is that some adults are exempt from the job ethic. Those who're "independently wealthy" or related to those who are:

usbig.net/usbig-blog-b...

@alexhowlett.bsky.social @karlwiderquist.bsky.social
USBIG Blog: Basic Income and the Something for Nothing Objection – USBIG
usbig.net

Reposted by Michael Lewis

Listened to the podcast episode. After hearing you there and reading your piece on your “conversion” to democratic socialism, I was impressed by your willingness to change your mind about things so fundamental. That’s pretty rare in my circles. 🙂

who has rights to what things, the main causes of social ills, etc., political polarization may be around for quite some time.

I finally listened to the episode. Important point you raised (although you didn’t word it this way) about the ethics of “punching up”. Hopefully, my wording accurately captures what you were getting it. Also, I agree with your point that since there are real differences in beliefs about fairness,

Will check this one out too.

Didn’t know that. Will take a look.

Meant "role" not "roll."

And so markets under democratic socialism may need to be regulated in ways that go beyond redistribution and beyond how they're regulated now. Looking forward to listening to the episode!

should have no place within democratic socialism, since centralized or decentralized planning, with no roll for markets, could be worse than inefficient markets would be. But it would mean that by using markets we could be using a more flawed method of allocation than Church seems to be suggesting.