Mona Paulsen
@monapaulsen.bsky.social
4.6K followers 960 following 1.6K posts
Assistant Professor in International Economic Law, LSE Law School. Specialisation in international trade law and economic security, in addition to research and teaching interests in international investment law, international development, and IPE.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
monapaulsen.bsky.social
Happy to share my publication, The Past, Present, and Potential of Economic Security, in 50 Yale Journal of International Law 222 (Summer 2025), now available on Hein Online (DM if you cannot access through your local libraries). My thanks to the student editors who worked hard on this publication.
monapaulsen.bsky.social
I just don’t talk enough about how @simonlester.com brought IEL folks together and how his business continues to inform us and offer a steady blogging platform for engagement. We need a place to build those long forms and accommodate central rapid discussion. A Goldilocks forum. Hope we get there.
monapaulsen.bsky.social
It was a huge long form post so maybe there’s a preference there! I just never go in X anymore, just happened to see it when checking on something Henry wrote.
monapaulsen.bsky.social
Peter Harrell over at X mentioned US should prioritise innovation and I don’t disagree! Question for fediverse is how to phase integration, as FT reported Niron Magnetics “end use for their products has yet to be determined.” Dependence on financing US-backed champions to catch up raises questions.
monapaulsen.bsky.social
China & US are locked in tit-for-tat retaliation. But, for now, are all outcomes lose-lose?

China isn’t evolving its strategy to tackle weakened/challenged external demands of its products.

US isn’t fostering coordination with producer or consumption countries to diversify from Chinese dependence.
monapaulsen.bsky.social
Thus far, several trading partners have placated the United States by opening their chequebook.

But I’d like to hope they’re at least electric trucks.
japantimes.co.jp
Japan is reportedly considering the purchase of Ford F-150 pickup trucks for use as government vehicles in an effort to fulfill pledges made during trade negotiations with the United States.
Ford F-150 might be imported by the Japanese government: report
The pickup trucks would be used by local transport ministry offices for construction and road patrols.
ebx.sh
monapaulsen.bsky.social
#RBCRaceforthrKids let’s go!
monapaulsen.bsky.social
Include scrap copper too?
bloomberg.com
Copper slumped by the most in five months after President Trump threatened a “massive increase” of tariffs on Chinese goods, in comments that sparked turmoil across financial markets
Copper Tumbles as Trump Threatens Massive New Tariffs on China
Copper plunged after President Donald Trump threatened a massive increase of tariffs on goods from China, the world’s top buyer of the industrial metal.
bloom.bg
monapaulsen.bsky.social
This past week, the overwhelming response to China’s new rare earth export controls (largely copying what the US has done...) has been met with a push for the so-called West (as if the US is interested in alliance) to respond.

Discourse highly defensive, but what about legal paths to a solution?
monapaulsen.bsky.social
Designing protections to appease one partner who you sell to, denying the consequences for the partner on the other end, who you buy from….
borderlex.net
Chinese rare earth export control measures worry EU. They “could severely disrupt global supply chains dependent on Chinese rare earth inputs and know-how,” Henry Gao, trade export and law professor, Singapore Management University.
@robfranciseu.bsky.social reports:
borderlex.net/2025/10/09/c...
China rare earth export controls: EU Commission “concerned” - Borderlex
The European Commission expressed concern over China's announcement that it would expand export controls with extraterritorial reach on Chinese rare earths.
borderlex.net
monapaulsen.bsky.social
Fascinating, is this the first time DBT is on the record of new anti-coercion defences?

Considering the US has yet to set the UK in its sights, is this about China? The EU?
Reposted by Mona Paulsen
Reposted by Mona Paulsen
monapaulsen.bsky.social
Such a hard, abstract question! I've been trying to answer it as fairly and squarely as possible. But it's incredibly difficult when the proposed regulation suggests contradictory objectives -- both WTO renegotiation TRQ in schedules and these efforts to 'ringfence' steel from like-minded Members.
Reposted by Mona Paulsen
theglobeandmail.com
After Carney and Trump's meeting at the White House, Canadian and U.S. officials have been tasked with "quickly" reaching agreements on steel, aluminum and energy before moving on to other trade issues. This is what U.S. tariffs currently look like for Canada: www.theglobeandmail.com/world/articl...
monapaulsen.bsky.social
And if so, it runs afoul of MFN, which remains at the heart of tariff bindings, which makes me question the intersection of any non-binding understanding with the Americans. To this, I question the approach to a broader arrangement for managing global overcapacity, akin to building on sand.
monapaulsen.bsky.social
Just to clarify my quick reaction to the legality of the EU's new steel measure. Renegotiating tariffs pursuant to Art XXVIII GATT procedures is not illegal -- indeed, it's an efficient way to address changed circumstances. Is it a sound basis for selective discrimination? No.
monapaulsen.bsky.social
USA - historicised; "great again"; controls; bargains; property protection (Made in USA); unicorns.

China - catch-up; "powering the future"; energy infrastructure; technocratic; controlled innovation; high-tech ecosystem; process knowledge