If you don't agree to those tariff conditions,
You better pay up billions in US energy acquisitions.
My heart, its yours, through emergency and wars,
You must complement our economic security
Or your industries will surely fade away into obscurity.
...
If you don't agree to those tariff conditions,
You better pay up billions in US energy acquisitions.
My heart, its yours, through emergency and wars,
You must complement our economic security
Or your industries will surely fade away into obscurity.
...
USMCA review has begun. Canada is free to pursue all trade agreements. Canada must notify USMCA partners in the event it seeks a free trade area with China, and accept potential bifurcation of the existing USMCA as a cost to it.
That's it.
USMCA review has begun. Canada is free to pursue all trade agreements. Canada must notify USMCA partners in the event it seeks a free trade area with China, and accept potential bifurcation of the existing USMCA as a cost to it.
That's it.
Are these commitments puffery or a worrying binding of many countries to a US neo-royal techno-imperialist plan?
www.linkedin.com/posts/mppaul...
Are these commitments puffery or a worrying binding of many countries to a US neo-royal techno-imperialist plan?
www.linkedin.com/posts/mppaul...
The breadth of the “Americas”
Not sure an academic conference can bring joy. But I'd like to think it could.
The breadth of the “Americas”
Not sure an academic conference can bring joy. But I'd like to think it could.
nilsgilman.substack.com/p/the-execut...
Not much.
The EO suggests the problem is overbearing federal regulation, leading the government to pursue smarter regulation...but I do not see that as the goal.
Not much.
The EO suggests the problem is overbearing federal regulation, leading the government to pursue smarter regulation...but I do not see that as the goal.
Otherwise IEEPA would never have into play to begin with.
Otherwise IEEPA would never have into play to begin with.
I completely disagree with the framing of coercion as pragmatism.
https://www.csis.org/analysis/new-executive-order-ties-us-critical-minerals-security-global-partnerships
I completely disagree with the framing of coercion as pragmatism.
www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
www.automotiveworld.com/news/gm-cuts...
www.automotiveworld.com/news/gm-cuts...
Find the pod here: pod.link/1525615736
Find the pod here: pod.link/1525615736
There's a narrative out there that the last 30 years constituted "hyperglobalization," but I don't think that reflects the reality of US trade policy, which had plenty of tariffs even in the midst of "neoliberalism."
There's a narrative out there that the last 30 years constituted "hyperglobalization," but I don't think that reflects the reality of US trade policy, which had plenty of tariffs even in the midst of "neoliberalism."
I'm not happy about it, because it means Trump has even more formidable coercive power at his command than tariffs.
But the truth needs to be squarely faced.
www.ft.com/content/a326...
I'm not happy about it, because it means Trump has even more formidable coercive power at his command than tariffs.
But the truth needs to be squarely faced.
www.ft.com/content/a326...