Mona Paulsen
banner
monapaulsen.bsky.social
Mona Paulsen
@monapaulsen.bsky.social
Assistant Professor in International Economic Law, LSE Law School. Specialisation in international trade law and economic security, in addition to research and teaching interests in international investment law, international development, and IPE.
Pinned
Happy to share my publication, The Past, Present, and Potential of Economic Security, in 50 Yale Journal of International Law 222 (Summer 2025), now available on Hein Online (DM if you cannot access through your local libraries). My thanks to the student editors who worked hard on this publication.
Roses are red, violets are blue,
If you don't agree to those tariff conditions,
You better pay up billions in US energy acquisitions.

My heart, its yours, through emergency and wars,
You must complement our economic security
Or your industries will surely fade away into obscurity.

...
February 13, 2026 at 3:00 PM
No point giving oxygen to every threat.

USMCA review has begun. Canada is free to pursue all trade agreements. Canada must notify USMCA partners in the event it seeks a free trade area with China, and accept potential bifurcation of the existing USMCA as a cost to it.
That's it.
Trump, in the middle of his latest unhinged Truth Social screed, claims that if Canada makes a trade deal with China, "the first thing China will do is terminate ALL Ice Hockey being played in Canada, and permanently eliminate The Stanley Cup."
February 10, 2026 at 2:44 PM
Growing commitments to complement US coercive practices seem to be an ever-growing attempt by the US to legitimise its actions.

Are these commitments puffery or a worrying binding of many countries to a US neo-royal techno-imperialist plan?

www.linkedin.com/posts/mppaul...
At a time when states must think long-term and develop strategies for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, driven by a plethora of stakeholders and technological advancements, what are we seeing?… | Mona...
At a time when states must think long-term and develop strategies for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, driven by a plethora of stakeholders and technological advancements, what are we seeing? Neo-roy...
www.linkedin.com
February 10, 2026 at 8:36 AM
If there are efforts to grant special and preferential (not equal) treatment to meet the development needs of advanced economies, will they continue to grant equivalent preferences to developing economies? Or will we see a new era of dependency and ordering that cloaks protection as public goods?
February 9, 2026 at 5:45 PM
Did Bad Bunny just give the American Society of International Law its theme for the year?

The breadth of the “Americas”

Not sure an academic conference can bring joy. But I'd like to think it could.
February 9, 2026 at 4:21 PM
Reposted by Mona Paulsen
U.K. Business and Trade Secretary Peter Kyle is heading to Brussels to dissuade the European Commission from shutting Britain out of its proposed “Made in Europe” initiative.
Britain’s trade chief races to Brussels to avoid ‘Made in Europe’ shutout
U.K. officials fear that planned industry act could lock British firms out of key European supply chains.
www.politico.eu
February 6, 2026 at 8:43 AM
Reposted by Mona Paulsen
The end of nuclear arms control ft.trib.al/WDwh6w7 | opinion
The end of nuclear arms control
Expiry of the New Start treaty makes the world a much more dangerous place
ft.trib.al
February 8, 2026 at 11:11 AM
Reposted by Mona Paulsen
Trump regime’s latest effort to whitewash history and control narrative: all State department posts on X made before Trump took office in 2025 will be removed. That includes accounts for US embassies, missions, ambassadors, department bureaus, programs. www.npr.org/2026/02/07/n...
State Department will delete X posts from before Trump returned to office
The policy change orders the removal of any post made by official State Department accounts on X before President Trump returned to office in 2025.
www.npr.org
February 8, 2026 at 5:32 AM
Reposted by Mona Paulsen
very good rejoinder to a pretty shoddy and motivated piece. my main comment though is that i would not concede the idea that roosevelt — who essentially coined “liberalism” as americans have understood it — was an “anti-liberal”
Useful, clarifying examination of Trumpism from @nilsgilman.bsky.social, focusing on its foundational elements of "extractive" capitalism, white nationalism, "the systematic dismantling of labor protections," abuses of power, self dealing, and corruption:
nilsgilman.substack.com/p/the-execut...
The Executive Fetish
Why Moyn and Goldsmith's Roosevelt-Trump analogy fails
nilsgilman.substack.com
February 7, 2026 at 4:02 PM
What strikes me most today in the news about coalitions, aside from the lack of details, is how governments continue to lend credence to what seem to be contradictory US policies. In letting the US lead global projects, we shift further away from very real questions about climate and inequality.
February 5, 2026 at 2:17 PM
What do we know from the EO on Critical Minerals?

Not much.

The EO suggests the problem is overbearing federal regulation, leading the government to pursue smarter regulation...but I do not see that as the goal.
February 5, 2026 at 8:06 AM
I mean there are other authorities available, sure, but some do not suit the stated objectives of the current IEEPA tariffs and most require investigation into a specific industry….so I wouldn’t say we’d see an immediate switcheroo.

Otherwise IEEPA would never have into play to begin with.
February 4, 2026 at 2:00 PM
Again…

I completely disagree with the framing of coercion as pragmatism.
February 4, 2026 at 7:04 AM
Few short years ago, these kinds of actions would render a country ineligible for tariff preference programmes by the US.
February 3, 2026 at 11:03 AM
Reposted by Mona Paulsen
I have questions about the legal infrastructure concerning the US Government's price-supporting mechanisms and its ability to control volatility in world markets.
www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
Trump to Launch $12 Billion Critical Mineral Stockpile to Blunt Reliance on China
President Donald Trump is set to launch a strategic critical-minerals stockpile with $12 billion in seed money, a bid to insulate manufacturers from supply shocks as the US works to slash its reliance...
www.bloomberg.com
February 2, 2026 at 3:27 PM
I have questions about the legal infrastructure concerning the US Government's price-supporting mechanisms and its ability to control volatility in world markets.
www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
Trump to Launch $12 Billion Critical Mineral Stockpile to Blunt Reliance on China
President Donald Trump is set to launch a strategic critical-minerals stockpile with $12 billion in seed money, a bid to insulate manufacturers from supply shocks as the US works to slash its reliance...
www.bloomberg.com
February 2, 2026 at 3:27 PM
“General Motors announced Thursday it will eliminate approximately 500 jobs at its Oshawa plant …GM rep Wright denied any connection to US tariffs—and the associated persistent threats by President Donald Trump against Canada.”

www.automotiveworld.com/news/gm-cuts...
GM cuts 500 Canada jobs, moves production back to US | Automotive World
GM has rejected any connection between the cuts and US trade policy, even as production gets moved back into the US. By Stewart Burnett
www.automotiveworld.com
February 1, 2026 at 8:12 AM
I just

Need to sit with

All and anything Catherine O’Hara

What a gift.
To laugh well.

What a comic legend. Toronto improv queen.

#SCTV
January 31, 2026 at 8:01 PM
Featuring my latest article on collective action through existing structures that encourage Members to cooperate, not coexistence, in pursuing shared efforts to redress volatile uncertainty.
January 31, 2026 at 12:02 PM
Delighted to join Prof. Greg Messenger (Bristol) for Episode 83 of #TradeSplaining with Rob and Ardian to discuss the state of trade law and politics today, what businesses should actually pay attention to amid the noise, and what comes next...

Find the pod here: pod.link/1525615736
pod.link
January 30, 2026 at 12:10 PM
Reposted by Mona Paulsen
New IELP post: "Jamieson Greer on the 30 Year Aberration in US Trade Policy"

There's a narrative out there that the last 30 years constituted "hyperglobalization," but I don't think that reflects the reality of US trade policy, which had plenty of tariffs even in the midst of "neoliberalism."
Jamieson Greer on the 30 Year Aberration in U.S. Trade Policy
When he was in Davos last week for the World Economic Forum, U.S. Trade Rep. Jamieson Greer talked a bit about U.S. trade policy history and described a recent period during which, in his view, U.S. t...
ielp.worldtradelaw.net
January 29, 2026 at 3:03 PM
Reposted by Mona Paulsen
An unpopular opinion, I know.
I'm not happy about it, because it means Trump has even more formidable coercive power at his command than tariffs.
But the truth needs to be squarely faced.
www.ft.com/content/a326...
Don’t bet on dollar dethronement
If you want to see how entrenched the US currency is in the global system, look at the foreign exchange swap market
www.ft.com
January 29, 2026 at 3:26 PM
Reposted by Mona Paulsen
Reposted by Mona Paulsen
Don’t bet on dollar dethronement ft.trib.al/gPTNw1X | opinion
Don’t bet on dollar dethronement
If you want to see how entrenched the US currency is in the global system, look at the foreign exchange swap market
ft.trib.al
January 29, 2026 at 2:36 PM