Not once have I seen an explanation for why teenagers must hear things that upset them in virtue of the unspecified speech-acts being upsetting, nor have I ever seen an explanation for why teenagers will be forbidden to express displeasure with upsetting things.
Not uni but when i was at school a friend didn't get kicked out of school for making smoke bombs out of a book that will now get you locked up just for possessing a copy of.
How are supposed journalists only just finding this out? Maybe if the press in this country had treated transphobia as more than an idle debate, you could have reported this sort of stuff 10 years ago.
I presumed falkner knew what her role was; ehrc involvement in forstater was due to her agreement. "i'm somewhat gender cditical" or whatever she said.
stephenson also knows, what with positive press and forced passed negative committees.
The thing i though about was spotify being interested in it. They can probably afford to pay people to learn the intricacies to produce something 'close enough' cause its cheaper thaN copywrite.
Probably easier for everyone else just to download ripped cds.
Yeah, i'm not saying its a good thing, but i imagine spotify will be able to get copywrite free 'content' that will fool people who want something in the background.
I'm going to go out on a limb here, and say that the trainspotter element of quite a lot of fan groups for music may actually aid gen ai here. Like, have you seen soundcloud and the like, discogs.
Loads of music with anally retentive levels of classification and breakdowns of track structure.
