Sonja Drimmer
@sonjadrimmer.bsky.social
11K followers 950 following 4.7K posts
Associate Professor, History of Art & Architecture, UMass Amherst. http://sonjadrimmer.com/about-forte (She/her)
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
sonjadrimmer.bsky.social
For the latest issue of Artforum I wrote about the culture of “AI” in my sector of academia, arguing that a focus on what it does distracts attention away from examining the exploitative conditions that the hopeful rhetoric of its promise upholds. www.artforum.com/features/gen...
MACHINE YEARNING
Sonja Drimmer critically examines art historians’ recent embrace of generative AI as a tool for humanities research.
www.artforum.com
sonjadrimmer.bsky.social
A fiercely disappointing piece. One reason why is that it’s not simply that Meek doesn’t cite a single woman (which would rankle, but isn’t inherently disqualifying); it’s that he just cites the same tired voices who frankly all have the same boring things to say. www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v4...
James Meek · Computers that want things
For all the fluency and synthetic friendliness of public-facing AI chatbots like ChatGPT, it seems important to remember...
www.lrb.co.uk
Reposted by Sonja Drimmer
sonjadrimmer.bsky.social
The soft opening for this was telling teachers to necromance chatbots out of Anne Frank. There’s a historical parallel to this I’ve been chewing on, a bit of gristle stuck in my teeth since I wrote this footnote about a public debate in Weimar Germany on the educative potential of replicas. 🧵
The use of copies to fill lacunae in collections was by no means always hitched to a progressive cause, as it was in this debate. For example, the Nazi-sponsored traveling exhibition Deutsche Größe of the early 1940s comprised replicas entirely. See Diebold
2015•
Reposted by Sonja Drimmer
jackiantonovich.bsky.social
I accidentally stumbled upon an AI video of a ring camera catching MLK Jr. playing a doorbell prank at a suburban home. Like, what are we doing here?
sonjadrimmer.bsky.social
The soft opening for this was telling teachers to necromance chatbots out of Anne Frank. There’s a historical parallel to this I’ve been chewing on, a bit of gristle stuck in my teeth since I wrote this footnote about a public debate in Weimar Germany on the educative potential of replicas. 🧵
The use of copies to fill lacunae in collections was by no means always hitched to a progressive cause, as it was in this debate. For example, the Nazi-sponsored traveling exhibition Deutsche Größe of the early 1940s comprised replicas entirely. See Diebold
2015•
sonjadrimmer.bsky.social
No, resurrecting the corpse of Anne Frank so 12-year-olds can gossip with her is not how you “make history come alive.” It’s how you destroy history so that someone can come in, rewrite it, and then author a future to their liking.
sonjadrimmer.bsky.social
So my point is that we need to get better at understanding when the language of progressivism is co-opted by bad actors to hustle into the public sphere (“too innovative for regulation”) technologies that threaten the basic foundations of trust necessary to a functioning society.
sonjadrimmer.bsky.social
appropriated this nice-sounding principle to sell a fabricated vision of history by doing things like creating a massive Nazi-sponsored traveling exhibition of art that used replicas only, the better to make a coherent vision of a Great German Past made of a clean succession of empires.
sonjadrimmer.bsky.social
This makes sense: the latter were interested in what we would now call accessibility and inclusivity. Sounds great: make art accessible to more people by producing copies and distributing them. But, in a process that Naomi Klein, drawing on Phillip Roth, would possibly call “pippicking,” the right
sonjadrimmer.bsky.social
Anyway. A perpetual irritant to me as I read this debate from 1929/30 was that all the arguments against replicas were voiced by arch conservatives (a couple of whom became actual Nazis) while those in favor of replicas were of a more progressive political cast.
sonjadrimmer.bsky.social
It’s a great debate to read and unfortunate for anglophone readers that it’s never been translated fully into English (I did my own translation which I hope to publish one day). But it’s very feisty!
Such replicas threaten, by producing a "deceptive replacement" (täuschenden Ersatz) and a "vitamin-free surrogate" (vitaminfreien Surrogat), to dull the public's senses, a condition Sauerlandt attributes more generally to an age of synthetic gemstones, canned vegetables, nicotineless cigars, and decaf coffee. Mechanical reproduction is not really at issue for the contributors; all seem to agree that there is a place for photographs in art instruction, and some celebrate the possibility of "impersonal tech-nology" (Panofsky [1930] 1986: 115; 2010: 333) to achieve an immacu-lacy transcending human bias. The sticking point is in the promise or the threat of substitution. It turns out that such fears, or hopes, were not unfounded, if not for the reasons their proponents expected.
sonjadrimmer.bsky.social
So the background to the story is this. And you can read my whole article here (direct download of a pdf) static1.squarespace.com/static/55577...
between 1929 and 1930 a feud erupted in the pages of the culture periodical Der Kreis: Zeitschrift für künstlerische Kultur. The conflict, later dubbed the Hamburg Facsimile Debate, was instigated by Max Sauerlandt, director of the Hamburg Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe, who condemned as a fake a recent electroform reproduction of the thirteenth-century Bamberg Rider. The dispute attracted numerous responses and became a focal point for emerging ideas about authenticity and the educative impact of the replica in the Weimar Republic.
sonjadrimmer.bsky.social
The soft opening for this was telling teachers to necromance chatbots out of Anne Frank. There’s a historical parallel to this I’ve been chewing on, a bit of gristle stuck in my teeth since I wrote this footnote about a public debate in Weimar Germany on the educative potential of replicas. 🧵
The use of copies to fill lacunae in collections was by no means always hitched to a progressive cause, as it was in this debate. For example, the Nazi-sponsored traveling exhibition Deutsche Größe of the early 1940s comprised replicas entirely. See Diebold
2015•
Reposted by Sonja Drimmer
wendysparrow.bsky.social
Not in all caps, but I have that shirt. I'd buy it again to give PBS money though, and I get comments every time I wear it.
The Reading Rainbow logo above the words "take a look it's in a book" on a blue T-shirt.
sonjadrimmer.bsky.social
I love this for you and want this for me.
sonjadrimmer.bsky.social
I would never have to talk to a not-nerd again.
sonjadrimmer.bsky.social
Then I’d put my little starship enterprise pin on it and only other nerds would talk to me and my life would be perfect.
sonjadrimmer.bsky.social
I would throw money at a t-shirt that says in all caps “TAKE A LOOK, IT’S IN A BOOK” over a rainbow.
sjjphd.bsky.social
I’m not trying to give @pbs.org ideas for raising money—but I am. I would buy women’s fit T-shirts of all my favorite childhood shows. Reading rainbow, 321 contact, square one, zoobiliee zoo. I feel like two generations will run to donate even more money for shirts with Levar Burton on them…
Reposted by Sonja Drimmer
sonjadrimmer.bsky.social
People think the first thing Gutenberg printed was the Bible. This is false. The first things he printed were a political prophecy, propaganda about the Turks’ threat to Christendom, & a popular school text. If you want a parallel to AI, that’s it: making $ from conspiracies, racism, & school slop.
sonjadrimmer.bsky.social
There’s no reason to respect any part of this process or behave like we need to usher our students toward an “enlightened” use of it. No one should waste their time lending respectability to something whose grounding principle is disrespect to basic human sociality.
sonjadrimmer.bsky.social
A lot of educators behave w the mindset they had in 2022 when they were blown away by the magic of a machine that bleepbloops a grammatically coherent 2000-wrd essay, even though they understand now it’s just token prediction. As a result they teach like we have to respect it as part of the process.
sonjadrimmer.bsky.social
LLM extruded essays are like being cornered by the most boring person at a party while they monotone monologue small talk at you, convinced that they’re pronouncing something profound.
Reposted by Sonja Drimmer
jdsargan.bsky.social
Your challenge for this weekend is to put in an abstract for Queer Bibliography 2026. It's what all the cool kids are doing.

The theme is Space, Place, Community (widely understood, certainly not limited to the South). CFP: shorturl.at/XAVJ0; Submit: forms.gle/XD7FgrrStp3j...

Athens GA and online
Poster reads: March 12–14, 2026; Queer Bibliography in the South: Space, Place, Community; University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Reposted by Sonja Drimmer
disabilitystor1.bsky.social
its like eating styrofoam.
sonjadrimmer.bsky.social
LLM extruded essays are like being cornered by the most boring person at a party while they monotone monologue small talk at you, convinced that they’re pronouncing something profound.