Thomas Bell
trivesbell.bsky.social
Thomas Bell
@trivesbell.bsky.social

Political Scientist at Knox College in Galesburg, IL. Texan in the Midwest. PhD from UT-Austin.

Author of The Constitution of Conflict: How the Supreme Court Undermines the Separation of Powers (forthcoming with Univ. Press of Kansas 2025) .. more

Environmental science 42%
Geology 18%
Pinned
Today is the release date for my new book The Constitution of Conflict, published by @univpressofkansas.bsky.social! The book argues that the separation of powers is better understood as a political architecture than a judicially-enforced legal doctrine.

www.amazon.com/Constitution...
The Constitution of Conflict: How the Supreme Court Undermines the Separation of Powers (Constitutional Thinking)
The Constitution of Conflict: How the Supreme Court Undermines the Separation of Powers (Constitutional Thinking) [Bell, Thomas] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. The Constitution of Conflict: How the Supreme Court Undermines the Separation of Powers (Constitutional Thinking)
www.amazon.com

I mean.... some institutions have a culture on this issue that is impossible to fight. I have small classes and repeat students and a casual campus culture and so I stopped fighting to go by professor. Right out of grad school I wanted to go by professor to have some social distance, but less so now

This is a really bad comparison!

Reposted by Thomas L. Bell

If you'd like to read a better account of the separation of powers—understood as a political architecture rather than a legalistic doctrine—check out @trivesbell.bsky.social's wonderful new book.

Thanks, Pat! I hope you enjoy it.

My intellectual debts are clear. My teacher @jktulis.bsky.social has taught me how to think about American politics more than anyone else. I have also benefitted immensely from the work and feedback of @joshchafetz.bsky.social and George Thomas, as well as Gary Jacobsohn, and H.W. Perry.

The book applies its analytical framework to case studies on the legislative veto, executive agreements, the appointments process, and congressional oversight and impeachment to demonstrate that institutional conflict rather than legal determinacy is an essential feature of the constitutional design

I argue that the Supreme Court's separation of jurisprudence often enforces the separation of powers for its own sake, which represents an inversion of means and ends. Non-judicialized conflict is essential for the polity to achieve its unlimited and politically-contingent ends.

Reposted by Thomas L. Bell

🎉🥳 Coming soon, with @trivesbell.bsky.social.

My friend Tim designed this sign. We’re printing yard signs where we live in Galesburg, IL. Feel free to print where you live, or to share widely on social media. This is a scandal.

We’re better than this. The rule of law matters.

Super minor point, but I hate the use of the word “convictional” in articles like these as it seems like an empty vessel.

Truth