The will to power is just so stronger with the MAGA GOP. Dems are still pretending that norms matter or "risk" is somehow a reason not to do something. When is the last time you heard a GOPer talk like that.Straight white Dem men are willing to watch the rest of us lose our rights 'cause "norms."
Or just assume he's going to deny having seen it, and play the video as part of the opening question. Why is our media pretending these guys are acting in good faith and telling the truth? Assume the lie from the beginning. It's what they do.
This is exactly the point. US is a very wealthy country, especially for a privileged few.We could feed, house and provide health insurance to everyone, while still allowing those privileged few to remain obscenely wealthy. Their refusal to share even a small amount of their wealth is the real story.
Rosen was one of the ten Senate traitors who broke with their party to fund Trump's regime for the last six months. Let's not promote anything she does to try and reclaim her reputation. She should be dead to us.
And as the State of Oregon's letter clearly establishes, using actual quotes from the DOJ lawyer's oral argument, he did in fact expressly mislead the 9th Circuit panel, stating that "many" of the 115 officers remained in Portland, when, at that time, only 20 were there. 20 out of 115 is not "many."
The DOJ letter claims the State of Oregon's letter did not claim that the DOJ's lawyer misrepresented the facts during argument, but the quotes from him in the state's letter show a pretty clear misrepresentation, where he suggested "many" of the 115 were still in Portland, when the actual # was 20.
Even their "correction" still significantly overstates the impact of the deployments. They don't acknowledge that at most 31 agents were ever in Portland at the same time and in September that number has been as low as 20.And they don't seem to address at all what their lawyer said during arguments.
Appellate courts do it on their own fairly regularly. Its a little dangerous to ask for that and lose, but the facts certainly warranted it and the 11th Circuit could have done it on its own.
Maybe, but don't let the 11th Circuit off the hook for failing to remove her from the case. They had several opportunities to do so, it's hardly unprecedented to remove a judge who repeatedly makes not just incorrect, but wholly irrational rulings. The whole federal judicial system failed us.
Why do you use euphemisms like "the press" here. My bet is most people in "the press" know who asked the question and that person has an actual name. Let's find out the name and make the idiot famous.
@schatz.bsky.social voted to fund Trump's government 6 months ago along with nine other Dem SOBs who stabbed their party in the back. Let's not promote anything he says as he tries to redeem himself. Schatz should be dead to us.
They aren't questioning the truthfulness,they've proven that Trumps DOJ's stooges lied.They are using DOJ's own discovery responses! Judge Garber's dissent directly questioned their vague assertions in declarations and the DOJ lawyer openly lied during the 9th Circuit argument.Why hedge about this?
This lets Justice Roberts off the hook way to easily. Law can't be a check on illegal behavior when the criminal is given absolute immunity. Roberts wholly made-up legal opinion finding some previoulsy unknown absolute immunity for Trump is 100% responsible for Trump's current recklessness.
Says the guy who has done more to enable Trump than any other person sitting on the Dem side of the Chamber in the senate. Angus King is right about that ballot initiative but he is a disgrace overall.
