Arbor Drone
@arbordrone.bsky.social
490 followers 1.1K following 47 posts
Science-based green infrastructure from above. Part 107 pilot focused on remote sensing of urban forests and woody plants. www.arbordrone.net
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Also, too, if you see a Fata Morgana the chances are good that you're enjoying nice weather.
Several species of small furry animals gathered together in a cave and grooving with a pict.
...also, the west is responsible for the large majority of new carbon in the atmosphere since 1750. Let's not forget that.
When is China forecast to have their emissions level off?
Thank you everyone at NOAA for everything. EOs are not laws.
Your template madam:

"the Trump administration apparently is going to get around to senselessly destroying the American _________ industry"
Reposted by Arbor Drone
Commentary: It isn’t just the DEI or climate grants getting the axe from President Trump. Science agencies face up to 55% cuts across the board. This means Ohio students will be denied opportunities for cutting-edge careers given to previous generations buff.ly/rvom6rH
DOGE cuts to science will impact Ohio, students • Ohio Capital Journal
It isn’t just the DEI or climate-related grants getting the axe from President Trump. Science agencies face up to 55% cuts across the board, tens of billions of dollars. This means Ohio students will…
buff.ly
"...police were called on the kids with a gun, they had the right to investigate..."

"Not with drones."

Again. What law or passage in the Constitution prevents this?
Does the public want police flying drones in regular patterns, hoping to find stuff? I doubt it.

Does the public accept police putting up drones for situations exactly like this or similar? I bet they do.

Is there a small % who wants zero police drones flying? Of course.
The topic is drone surveillance from air, so it is completely relevant. SCOTUS ruled that seeing something during overflights of property in public space is not protected privacy. I doubt you can find polling that shows public doesn't want police using drones in the manner seen in ABQ.
Which right not to be infringed?
I asked you what law this violates, or what the community says against it, and here you are pretending I'm advocating for it. Very strange tactic.
But to the original point: you haven't shown this is an invasion of privacy. Has the community tried to shut down this type of surveillance? Is there polling that finds the American publics do not want police using drones in this manner?
I agree that I'm insulated and wd never have a household that required 50 police visits. Since this is obviously an issue of public safety in a state where I don't live, it will not protect me. Maybe you are arguing there are limits on how police should protect the community - discuss it with them.
I'm not speaking in any kind of way. Why would you make this statement.
So...what is the bad law allowing police surveillance by drones in this situation?
What is the statute or ruling on which you are relying to make this statement?
Now every American can be a farmer again!
We know now a variety is best - both to avoid crop failure and to avoid tedium.
So I can eat potatoes all day every day for years, like the Irish did? Is there an alternative?
So 2.5 acres per year to produce the food we consume?
How many acres of land is required to provide adequate calories for the average American diet?
I like to mix breakfast cereals. I'd like to present at your conference, here is my proposal title:

"Intercereal Dynamics: A Multivariate Examination of Texture, Flavor, and Nutrient Interactions in Mixed Cereal Consumption"