AstroArxiv
@astroarxiv.bsky.social
340 followers 2 following 28K posts
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
astroarxiv.bsky.social
SOAPv4: A new step toward modeling stellar signatures in exoplanet research. E. Cristo et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08319
Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4
astroarxiv.bsky.social
Tidal disruption of a neutron star near naked singularity. Ashok B. Joshi (Charotar Uni. and Ahmedabad Uni. et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.26108
Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4
astroarxiv.bsky.social
An Introduction to Gravitational Wave Theory. Simone Speziale et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.21817
Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4
astroarxiv.bsky.social
Toward Low-Latency, High-Fidelity Calibration of the LIGO Detectors with Enhanced Monitoring Tools. M. Wade et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08423
Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 An example of line subtraction from data in the LIGO Hanford detector.  This figure shows the amplitude spectral density (ASD) zoomed in on the 17.1 Hz Pcal line.  The data with no line subtraction applied is shown in red.  The data with line subtraction performed using a static 128 second runnin...
astroarxiv.bsky.social
Love beyond Einstein: Metric reconstruction and Love number in quadratic gravity using WEFT. Arpan Bhattacharyya et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02785
Feynman diagrams contributing to the computation of the one-point function of $ $ and $ $ up to 1PN. We need to sum up these diagrams to perturbatively reconstruct the metric. Numeric vs analytic $F( )$ Numeric vs analytic $F( )$ Numeric vs analytic $H( )$
astroarxiv.bsky.social
Extended momentum-dependent interaction for transport models and neutron stars. Si-Pei Wang et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.02448
Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4
astroarxiv.bsky.social
Tidal heating in binary inspiral of strange quark stars. Suprovo Ghosh et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.07659
Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4
astroarxiv.bsky.social
Scalable Cosmic AI Inference using Cloud Serverless Computing. Mills Staylor et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.06249
AWS Lambda Memory Usage by Partition Data Size.  We empirically size the dataset  based on the partition data size in MB. CAI: number of AWS Lambda Function invocations for different data sizes.  Similar to figure  {fig:cai-throughput The parameter counts for recent deep learning-based methods developed for astronomy images, capable of inference across diverse computing environments—including a personal laptop, HPC CPUs, HPC GPUs, and our proposed cloud-based framework, CAI. A pre-trained AstroMAE model is used for the inferen... CAI framework overview using AWS Lambda Functions. It uses an AWS S3 bucket for data, code, and result storage. The state machine defines the workflow execution steps using AWS Lambda functions and distributed maps. Parallel execution is achieved through data partitions for almost linear high-per...
astroarxiv.bsky.social
Visions in Quantum Gravity. Luca Buoninfante et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.08696
Figure 1
astroarxiv.bsky.social
Lectures in Quantum Gravity. Ivano Basile et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.08690
Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4
astroarxiv.bsky.social
Comparison of global networks of third-generation gravitational-wave detectors. Michele Maggiore et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.05754
Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4
astroarxiv.bsky.social
Unitarity, Causality, and Solar System Bounds May Significantly Limit the Use of Gravitational Waves to Test General Relativity. Alexander Cassem et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.12118
Experimental bounds on the size of corrections to Newton's potential $ $ as a function of scale $ $; taken from Ref.~ {Adelberger:2003zx Experimental bounds on the size of corrections to Newton's potential $ $ as a function of scale $ $; taken from Ref.~ {Adelberger:2003zx Correction to the potential $ $ between point masses due to a scalar ($N=1$) running in a loop versus distance $r$.      The black curve is the full numerical result from Fourier transforming Eq.~( {expanded version of Jq2 for total amplitude Figure 4
astroarxiv.bsky.social
Getting More Out of Black Hole Superradiance: a Statistically Rigorous Approach to Ultralight Boson Constraints from Black Hole Spin Measurements. Sebastian Hoof et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.10337
Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4
astroarxiv.bsky.social
FIELDMAPS Data Release: Far-Infrared Polarization in the "Bones" of the Milky Way. Simon Coudé et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.25832
Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4
astroarxiv.bsky.social
Comparing Minimal and Non-Minimal Quintessence Models to 2025 DESI Data. Husam Adam et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.13302
Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4
astroarxiv.bsky.social
Tidal disruption events in active galactic nuclei: on orbital inclination and Schwarzschild apsidal precession. Minghao Zhang et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.07535
Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4
astroarxiv.bsky.social
PowerBin: Fast Adaptive Data Binning with Centroidal Power Diagrams. Michele Cappellari (University of Oxford) https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.06903
Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4
astroarxiv.bsky.social
Multi-band Spectral and Astrometric Characterization of the HIP 99770 b Planet with SCExAO/CHARIS and Gaia. Danielle Bovie et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.02665
Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4
astroarxiv.bsky.social
Onset of CN Emission in 3I/ATLAS: Evidence for Strong Carbon-Chain Depletion. Luis E. Salazar Manzano et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.01647
Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4
astroarxiv.bsky.social
Group Therapy for Halos: Advancing Halo Mass Estimation for Galaxy Groups. Welsey Van Kempen et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.12556
Figure 1 Figure 2 Distribution of quenched fraction in the stellar mass–halo mass plane for galaxy groups in the observational dataset of  {VanKempen2024 Figure 4
astroarxiv.bsky.social
Analytical estimates for heliocentric escape of satellite ejecta. Jose Daniel Castro-Cisneros et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06856
Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4
astroarxiv.bsky.social
Auriga Superstars: Improving the resolution and fidelity of stellar dynamics in cosmological galaxy simulations. Ruediger Pakmor et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.22104
Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4
astroarxiv.bsky.social
Hydrodynamical modeling of SN 2025kg associated with the Fast X-ray Transient EP250108a. L.M. Roman Aguilar et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.20457
Figure 1
astroarxiv.bsky.social
All-sky neutrino point-source search with IceCube combined track and cascade data. R. Abbasi et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.07275
Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4
astroarxiv.bsky.social
Constraints on Cosmologically Coupled Black Holes from Planck 2018 and Other Cosmological Probes. Shintaro K. Hayashi https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.03408
Figure 1 Figure 2 Comoving BH mass functions at redshifts $z = 0$, $1$, $2$, $4$, $6$, $8$, and $10$, using the fitting function in Eq.~ {schechtergaussian Figure 4