Dave Siegel
@daveasiegel.bsky.social
1.8K followers 520 following 38 posts
Professor of Political Science and Public Policy at Duke University. Associate Editor (Formal Theory) of the AJPS. daveasiegel.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
daveasiegel.bsky.social
I’m pleased to announce to #polisky our forthcoming APSR article, “Measurement that Matches Theory.” In it, we introduce a Bayesian IRT framework that allows users to identify latent dimensions with substantive theoretical meaning. The paper is open access for now here: tinyurl.com/48ktz5jc. (1/8)🧵
Measurement That Matches Theory: Theory-Driven Identification in Item Response Theory Models | American Political Science Review | Cambridge Core
Measurement That Matches Theory: Theory-Driven Identification in Item Response Theory Models
www.cambridge.org
daveasiegel.bsky.social
Probably should've tagged this thread: #Polisky #PolScience
daveasiegel.bsky.social
This was very much a group effort. Most of my co-authors aren't here, but I'll tag the amazing @margaretfoster.bsky.social. We hope this tool can be widely useful, and are happy to answer any questions you might have! (7/7)
daveasiegel.bsky.social
Right now one needs to convert to binary input data to use IRTM, but we're also working on extensions to other data types. We provide a vignette in the package to walk the user through IRTM's use. (6/7)
daveasiegel.bsky.social
Because you can run IRTM on large datasets with complex loading constraints, it opens up theoretically-driven measurement to a lot more contexts. We focus on the importance of matching measurement to theory in the paper, but are working on making clearer the range of uses in ongoing work. (5/7)
daveasiegel.bsky.social
It's also user-friendly, requiring little coding or package knowledge: just give it input data and a constraint matrix for the pre-specification, and it will provide individual-level posterior distributions over latent dimensions. No need to learn any package-specific syntax. (4/7)
daveasiegel.bsky.social
IRTM trades off some generality in specification, as packages such as brms or blavaan can achieve, for substantially increased speed: it runs on data with 10k respondents and 200+ items with 4 latent dimensions in about 10 minutes, regardless of the complexity of the pre-specified connections. 3/7
daveasiegel.bsky.social
IRTM is a Bayesian implementation of an Item Response Theory model in a similar vein to other constrained approaches such as BCFA or BSEM: it allows the user to pre-specify connections between items/questions and theoretically-coherent latent dimensions. (2/7)
daveasiegel.bsky.social
Happy to see that this is now out. The R package associated with the project, IRTM, can now be found on CRAN. Or can you still download it from my github. We'll continue to update it over time. This is a brief thread about what IRTM can do. 🧵 (1/7)
apsrjournal.bsky.social
From our new issue: "Measurement That Matches Theory: Theory-Driven Identification in Item Response Theory Models" by Marco Morucci, Margaret Foster, Kaitlyn Webster, So Jin Lee, and David Siegel. #APSRNewIssue www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Reposted by Dave Siegel
apsrjournal.bsky.social
From our new issue: "Measurement That Matches Theory: Theory-Driven Identification in Item Response Theory Models" by Marco Morucci, Margaret Foster, Kaitlyn Webster, So Jin Lee, and David Siegel. #APSRNewIssue www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
daveasiegel.bsky.social
Thanks for this! I'd love to be added, if possible.
daveasiegel.bsky.social
Thanks for putting this together! Would love to be added.
Reposted by Dave Siegel
jongreen.bsky.social
if you want a break from the election, we've posted a revision of our paper on pundits and ideological coalitions. bigger emphasis in this draft on the point that political ideologies aren't quite the same thing as political philosophies osf.io/xfy8r
daveasiegel.bsky.social
I said this in my first-year grad research methods class, but it bears repeating. There are people who will tell you that you are not smart enough to understand something. Those people either don't understand the nature of intelligence, don't have your best interests at heart, or both. Ignore them.
Reposted by Dave Siegel
jongreen.bsky.social
Just accepted at JOP w/ Daniel Naftel @kshoub.bsky.social, @jarededgerton.bsky.social, Mallory Wagner, and Skyler Cranmer. We find that patterns of gender inequality observed in formal deliberative settings extend to informal televised political discussions. www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/...
Paper title page (too long for alt text) Figure 2: Effect of Women's Numbers on the Female-to-Male Ratio of Words Spoken
daveasiegel.bsky.social
This is NSF-funded work, joint with Marco Morucci, Margaret Foster, Katie Webster, and So Jin Lee. None of whom are on Bluesky yet. (8/8)
daveasiegel.bsky.social
We think the framework has the potential to help a lot of measurement problems. We’re working right now to extend the input data from dichotomous to multichotomous and continuous as well. It may be of interest to #econsky as well. (7/8)
daveasiegel.bsky.social
There’s a lot more in the paper. For example, the figure shows how IRT-M can produce estimates of abstract concepts (sense of "threat", by the media sources that they trust) in data not designed to measure the concepts (the Eurobarometer survey). (6/8)
daveasiegel.bsky.social
The package does the rest. The latent dimensions it captures can be correlated, and IRT-M discovers any such correlation from the data. The supervised steps ensure that the measures remain consistent across time and space. (5/8)
daveasiegel.bsky.social
Then, researchers identify data sources and assess how the latent dimensions would show up in the data, which can depend on context. Then, they construct a constraint matrix that encodes dependencies between items in the data and the latent dimensions. (4/8)
daveasiegel.bsky.social
We call this framework IRT-M, and it makes it easier for researchers to construct, measure, and present subtle or abstract concepts in their data. It’s a semi-supervised method. First, researchers identify theoretically meaningful latent dimensions. (3/8)