Dianne Robbins
@diannerobbinssocial.com
Keeping the Human in AI. Structure over tactics. Systems over tools. Get the weekly newsletter: https://tinyurl.com/ywwrvwny
https://diannerobbinssocial.com/
https://diannerobbinssocial.com/
Pinned
Dianne Robbins
@diannerobbinssocial.com
· Dec 23
Most AI advice focuses on execution. My work focuses on structure—because once systems drift, execution fixes come too late.
If you care about authority, trust, and decision-making in AI-shaped environments, not quick fixes, you’ll find the lens here consistent.
If you care about authority, trust, and decision-making in AI-shaped environments, not quick fixes, you’ll find the lens here consistent.
Recalling a decision means it exists somewhere you can point to. Reconstructing means rebuilding it from memory each time. The difference determines whether your system survives change.
Four Signals Your Content System Is Running on Memory
The explanation that sprawls, the revision you can't name, the decision you keep remaking. Four signals your system is running on memory.
tinyurl.com
January 29, 2026 at 9:31 PM
Recalling a decision means it exists somewhere you can point to. Reconstructing means rebuilding it from memory each time. The difference determines whether your system survives change.
You keep fixing the same things in every AI draft. The phrasing. The tone. The structure that's almost right but not quite.
The patterns are already there. AI can surface what you've never documented.
The patterns are already there. AI can surface what you've never documented.
January 29, 2026 at 6:33 PM
You keep fixing the same things in every AI draft. The phrasing. The tone. The structure that's almost right but not quite.
The patterns are already there. AI can surface what you've never documented.
The patterns are already there. AI can surface what you've never documented.
"Write this in my voice" is an instruction with no execution path.
AI has no access to your recognition. All it has is your description—and descriptions contain no executable patterns.
Your voice isn't something AI can infer from adjectives. It's infrastructure you have to build.
AI has no access to your recognition. All it has is your description—and descriptions contain no executable patterns.
Your voice isn't something AI can infer from adjectives. It's infrastructure you have to build.
January 28, 2026 at 6:02 PM
"Write this in my voice" is an instruction with no execution path.
AI has no access to your recognition. All it has is your description—and descriptions contain no executable patterns.
Your voice isn't something AI can infer from adjectives. It's infrastructure you have to build.
AI has no access to your recognition. All it has is your description—and descriptions contain no executable patterns.
Your voice isn't something AI can infer from adjectives. It's infrastructure you have to build.
You describe what you want. AI delivers something else. You revise the prompt, add context, try again. The output still misses.
The problem isn't your prompting. It's what AI has to work from.
The problem isn't your prompting. It's what AI has to work from.
January 27, 2026 at 10:03 PM
You describe what you want. AI delivers something else. You revise the prompt, add context, try again. The output still misses.
The problem isn't your prompting. It's what AI has to work from.
The problem isn't your prompting. It's what AI has to work from.
Memory doesn't store decisions—it reconstructs them. That's why your content system breaks every time you try to scale it.
Why Your AI Content Systems Break
Your AI content system works—until you change something. The issue isn't the change. It's running on memory instead of documentation.
tinyurl.com
January 27, 2026 at 6:31 PM
Memory doesn't store decisions—it reconstructs them. That's why your content system breaks every time you try to scale it.
Try to prompt AI for one piece of your workflow.
If writing the prompt takes longer than doing it yourself, you've found the infrastructure gap.
You're not describing a system. You're surfacing decisions that were never externalized as constraints AI could execute against.
If writing the prompt takes longer than doing it yourself, you've found the infrastructure gap.
You're not describing a system. You're surfacing decisions that were never externalized as constraints AI could execute against.
January 26, 2026 at 8:01 PM
Try to prompt AI for one piece of your workflow.
If writing the prompt takes longer than doing it yourself, you've found the infrastructure gap.
You're not describing a system. You're surfacing decisions that were never externalized as constraints AI could execute against.
If writing the prompt takes longer than doing it yourself, you've found the infrastructure gap.
You're not describing a system. You're surfacing decisions that were never externalized as constraints AI could execute against.
Your content system has a hidden dependency: your memory.
Every recall reconstructs rather than retrieves. When you prompt based on today's reconstruction, AI executes against unstable infrastructure.
AI didn't drift. The reference was never stable.
Every recall reconstructs rather than retrieves. When you prompt based on today's reconstruction, AI executes against unstable infrastructure.
AI didn't drift. The reference was never stable.
January 25, 2026 at 6:30 PM
Your content system has a hidden dependency: your memory.
Every recall reconstructs rather than retrieves. When you prompt based on today's reconstruction, AI executes against unstable infrastructure.
AI didn't drift. The reference was never stable.
Every recall reconstructs rather than retrieves. When you prompt based on today's reconstruction, AI executes against unstable infrastructure.
AI didn't drift. The reference was never stable.
Not failing isn't the same as being found.
January 13, 2026 at 2:02 AM
Not failing isn't the same as being found.
AI visibility isn't something you engineer through tactics. It's a byproduct of being worth citing in the first place.
Building Content That AI Search Surfaces
The tactics that built your Google visibility don't transfer to AI search. Here's a 5-part AI search content system to help you get cited.
diannerobbinssocial.com
January 5, 2026 at 7:02 PM
AI visibility isn't something you engineer through tactics. It's a byproduct of being worth citing in the first place.
If someone stripped your name from your last five posts, could anyone pick them out of a pile? Not by quality. Not by topic. By how you think.
The Safety of Sounding Like Everyone Else
You sound credible. But can AI attribute your ideas to you specifically? Why blending in makes you invisible to both humans and AI systems.
diannerobbinssocial.com
January 4, 2026 at 6:02 PM
If someone stripped your name from your last five posts, could anyone pick them out of a pile? Not by quality. Not by topic. By how you think.
High standards and bursts of emotion when tools miss the mark. Yeah, that's fair. Thanks, ChatGPT. Happy New Year!
December 31, 2025 at 6:31 PM
High standards and bursts of emotion when tools miss the mark. Yeah, that's fair. Thanks, ChatGPT. Happy New Year!
I didn't realize how much this year was about narrowing down until I saw it reflected back to me. Thanks, ChatGPT. Here's to more clarity and less noise in 2026 — wishing everyone a focused and successful new year.
December 30, 2025 at 6:03 PM
I didn't realize how much this year was about narrowing down until I saw it reflected back to me. Thanks, ChatGPT. Here's to more clarity and less noise in 2026 — wishing everyone a focused and successful new year.
The AI tracker works. It just has nothing good to report.
December 26, 2025 at 6:31 PM
The AI tracker works. It just has nothing good to report.
The question most ask: How do I get AI to cite me?
The question that matters: Why should anyone—human or model—reference my work?
Answer the second question, and the first takes care of itself.
The question that matters: Why should anyone—human or model—reference my work?
Answer the second question, and the first takes care of itself.
December 25, 2025 at 11:30 PM
The question most ask: How do I get AI to cite me?
The question that matters: Why should anyone—human or model—reference my work?
Answer the second question, and the first takes care of itself.
The question that matters: Why should anyone—human or model—reference my work?
Answer the second question, and the first takes care of itself.
AI-generated structure often looks sound at first glance.
But if the structure collapses when you change the topic or format, the workflow wasn’t stable — it was convenient.
Test with variation, not comfort.
But if the structure collapses when you change the topic or format, the workflow wasn’t stable — it was convenient.
Test with variation, not comfort.
December 25, 2025 at 6:30 PM
AI-generated structure often looks sound at first glance.
But if the structure collapses when you change the topic or format, the workflow wasn’t stable — it was convenient.
Test with variation, not comfort.
But if the structure collapses when you change the topic or format, the workflow wasn’t stable — it was convenient.
Test with variation, not comfort.
AI-assisted workflows fail quietly when you skip the readiness check.
A draft can be polished and still misaligned, unclear, or incomplete.
Readiness is about function, not appearance.
A draft can be polished and still misaligned, unclear, or incomplete.
Readiness is about function, not appearance.
December 24, 2025 at 9:30 PM
AI-assisted workflows fail quietly when you skip the readiness check.
A draft can be polished and still misaligned, unclear, or incomplete.
Readiness is about function, not appearance.
A draft can be polished and still misaligned, unclear, or incomplete.
Readiness is about function, not appearance.
AI output becomes harder to evaluate when you rely on “does this look good?”
That question tests appearance, not reliability.
“Does this hold up across inputs?” is the question that builds systems.
That question tests appearance, not reliability.
“Does this hold up across inputs?” is the question that builds systems.
December 24, 2025 at 6:01 PM
AI output becomes harder to evaluate when you rely on “does this look good?”
That question tests appearance, not reliability.
“Does this hold up across inputs?” is the question that builds systems.
That question tests appearance, not reliability.
“Does this hold up across inputs?” is the question that builds systems.
AI visibility isn't built on your domain alone.
December 24, 2025 at 1:24 AM
AI visibility isn't built on your domain alone.
AI detection tells you whether the model avoided predictable signatures.
Voice checking tells you whether you stayed present.
Those two tests measure different things, and only one protects your identity.
Voice checking tells you whether you stayed present.
Those two tests measure different things, and only one protects your identity.
December 23, 2025 at 10:01 PM
AI detection tells you whether the model avoided predictable signatures.
Voice checking tells you whether you stayed present.
Those two tests measure different things, and only one protects your identity.
Voice checking tells you whether you stayed present.
Those two tests measure different things, and only one protects your identity.
AI drafts blur your voice when your workflow doesn't check for the patterns that define how you explain things.
The way you introduce examples, build arguments, and structure ideas must be visible enough to audit.
Voice isn't vibe — it’s pattern.
The way you introduce examples, build arguments, and structure ideas must be visible enough to audit.
Voice isn't vibe — it’s pattern.
December 23, 2025 at 6:30 PM
AI drafts blur your voice when your workflow doesn't check for the patterns that define how you explain things.
The way you introduce examples, build arguments, and structure ideas must be visible enough to audit.
Voice isn't vibe — it’s pattern.
The way you introduce examples, build arguments, and structure ideas must be visible enough to audit.
Voice isn't vibe — it’s pattern.