Lightnews — Scholar-powered news

DilDog 🅅 @dildog.l0pht.com · 21h

Ah that could be! In that case i could definitely use a ‘blocked by <source>’ comment or some such

Reposted by DilDog 🅅

rekdt @rekdt.com · 23h

Are you in charge of writing Cybersecurity incident reports and need to spice up the language so the report isn’t so boring??

Try this, instead of saying we suffered a breach due to the compromise of a 3rd party:

> we got fucked in the aaS

Follow me for more pro writing tips

1 3 22

DilDog 🅅 @dildog.l0pht.com · 23h

circumcision is now called autisdick

sorry you get the whole thought process behind this skeet

1 1 11

DilDog 🅅 @dildog.l0pht.com · 23h

autisdick

1 9

DilDog 🅅 @dildog.l0pht.com · 23h

i got that tylenol dick

2 16

DilDog 🅅 @dildog.l0pht.com · 1d

Yea but when you block someone it prevents ME from seeing it too, if i am viewing one of your replies from before your block

3 6

DilDog 🅅 @dildog.l0pht.com · 1d

i am celebrating sametober by doing the same thing as i usually do

2 4

DilDog 🅅 @dildog.l0pht.com · 1d

yeah exactly
just tell me why dildog from a year ago was thinking because today dildog dont remember shit

1 10

DilDog 🅅 @dildog.l0pht.com · 1d

I suppose the logic is probably: "if you blocked someone, you are implying that you do not want to amplify their content"

Interesting experiment, but i'm not sure it's 'working' for me :P

1 3

DilDog 🅅 @dildog.l0pht.com · 1d

and if i dont have them blocked, i'd like to see what was being blocked, optionally, so i could make my own judgement call. right now i can't tell if i blocked them, who they are, if the other person blocked them, absolutely no context other than a bunch of replies to -something-

3 6

DilDog 🅅 @dildog.l0pht.com · 1d

wish i could see who was being blocked though
just says 'post blocked', leaving me to wonder who the fuck that was and if i should also block them or what

2 10

DilDog 🅅 @dildog.l0pht.com · 1d

‘we took the freedom of speech away’