Dio D. Vicen
@diovicen.bsky.social
490 followers 490 following 99 posts
Vicente Raja; but I want to be Luffy. Ramón y Cajal Research Fellow at the University of Murcia (Spain). Associate Faculty at the Rotman Institute of Philosophy (Canada).
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
diovicen.bsky.social
Is ecological neuroscience a feasible enterprise? After some theoretical work on ecological resonance, we've engaged on experimental research to test some of the hypotheses that follow from it. These are the first results of (hopefully) many more to come! It's open access 👇
doi.org/10.1111/psyp...
<em>Psychophysiology</em> | SPR Journal | Wiley Online Library
This study bridges brain and body through ecological psychology and neuroscience by demonstrating how ecological information—in this case, “time to contact” or tau—constrains brain activity and as mu...
doi.org
diovicen.bsky.social
To be completely honest, I think that, in general, neuroscientists are far more open to this issue than the "philosophers of".
diovicen.bsky.social
"Although neuroscience has developed powerful tools for measuring brain activity, its behavioral measures are far more primitive, as it lacks a coherent conceptual framework for analyzing and interpreting behavior."

True! Happy to see this idea is growing.
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Aligning brain and behavior
To understand how the brain generates behavior, both brain activity and behavior must be measured accurately. Although neuroscience has developed powe…
www.sciencedirect.com
diovicen.bsky.social
It never ceases to amaze me how angry some people in mainstream cognitive science get when one talks about non-representation/non-computation while they completely refuse to at least read something about it so they can have an actual reason to be angry that is not just "hey, normal science, bro".
diovicen.bsky.social
My impression is we’ve lost this kind of thinking in contemporary neuroscience: that we need good theories of the brain and *behavior* to explain stuff. James, Lashley, Hebb, Tolman, Skinner, Gibson… They all agreed on that.
wiringthebrain.bsky.social
Karl Lashley, writing in 1930, on the Basic Neural Mechanisms of Behaviour: wexler.free.fr/library/file...
diovicen.bsky.social
David Lee just died.
He formulated tau/time-to-contact, the most famous bit of ecological information.
He is one of the main reasons why ecological psychology is still alive.
We all are indebted to him. I met him once and ended up having dinner at his place. Very cool guy!
RIP
diovicen.bsky.social
Affordances are motifs. Representations are motifs. A sentence with both words can mean anything! 😱
wiringthebrain.bsky.social
This'll drive the ecological psychology / direct perception folks nuts! Yes, affordances have to be represented! 😅
irisgroen.bsky.social
We studied affordances, a term introduced by Gibson (1979) to describe the idea that vision entails perceiving the action possibilities of environments. We wanted to know: can we find evidence that the human brain represents perceived affordances of scenes?

www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/1...
diovicen.bsky.social
No os lo vais a creer, pero en el otro lado hay un grupo de filo-bros discutiendo durante días sobre si hay ideología en la ciencia. Al quinto día empiezan a apelar a Popper. Hay que quererlos.
diovicen.bsky.social
I work (mostly) on ecological psychology and (often) on plant intelligence. And you can’t imagine the amount of ideological reviews I get. Really bad scholarship, if you ask me.
Is this also the case for people working on more mainstream frameworks?
Reposted by Dio D. Vicen
segundo-ortin.bsky.social
¡NEW PUBLICATION ALERT!

"A World of Minds: Ecological Psychology as a Framework for Comparative Cognition"

Authors: Miguel Segundo-Ortin, Paco Calvo, & Louise Barrett

You can download it from here: miguelsegundoortinphd.com/publications
Publications – Miguel Segundo Ortín, PhD
miguelsegundoortinphd.com
diovicen.bsky.social
This might be the best BlueSky thread to date.
Don't be like Vinny.
vincentcostaphd.bsky.social
Philosophy has jumped the shark.

If anyone in the philosophy community wonders why their neuroscientist colleagues don’t pay them any mind, read this paper.

bsky.app/profile/zoed...
zoedrayson.bsky.social
My paper 'Representations are (still) theoretical posits' is forthcoming in a special of Theoria on representations in cognitive science. Preprint available at philpapers.org/rec/DRARAS-2.
diovicen.bsky.social
Exactly! We hope the ecological information that specifies the affordance will be somehow reflected in brain activity. With apologies for further self-promotion, we are trying to figure out how to test this: doi.org/10.31234/osf...
OSF
doi.org
diovicen.bsky.social
I think the main issue re affordances is that eco. psychs. think they are not/cannot be encoded/represented in the brain. If anything, brain activity is coupled to ecological info.
A little bit of self-promotion, but I think this an accesible primer on contemporary eco. psy.: doi.org/10.1017/9781...
Ecological Psychology
Cambridge Core - Biological Psychology - Ecological Psychology
doi.org
diovicen.bsky.social
In an alternative universe, cog. scientists *read* eco. psych. and find out that...
1. The foundational texts of eco. psych. (Gibson 1966, 1979) don't talk about representations.
2. Affordances aren't what they think they are.
3. The core is ecological information.
4. 50 years+ of experimental work.
diovicen.bsky.social
To be fair, the press release says "SCENE builds on principles from ecological psychology", so I guess the Andrew's question is legit.
diovicen.bsky.social
Just coming here to say I admire your constraint in answering this kind of stuff. You are a saint 😇
diovicen.bsky.social
I'm happy & sad.
Happy part: the word "ecological" becomes usual in neuroscience.
Sad part: "affordances", yes, but the aim is to find how they are encoded in the brain.

Some eco. psychs. in the project would've made it radical but perhaps more interesting? Something like: doi.org/10.1111/ejn....
diovicen.bsky.social
I should probably know this, but there's any ecological psychologist in the Toronto area (maybe Southern Ontario in general)?
diovicen.bsky.social
We all have at some point, I think 😁
diovicen.bsky.social
What do you think is the statement most often (uncritically) repeated in cognitive science, biology, and their philosophy that is nevertheless quite obviously false?

In my opinion, it is:
"Organisms face an uncertain, ever-changing environment."