Living the retired life!
This leaves me with a lot of questions.
The numbers in the sample table don't add up.
Can anyone make it make sense?
If not, I'm not sure how we take the analysis seriously.
🔗 open.alberta.ca/dataset/2919...
This leaves me with a lot of questions.
Why?
Not just because they can.
And not because they have to.
They're doing it deliberately, whether out of spite, laziness, or expediency.
My latest:
🔗 open.substack.com/pub/drjaredw...
Why?
Not just because they can.
And not because they have to.
They're doing it deliberately, whether out of spite, laziness, or expediency.
My latest:
🔗 open.substack.com/pub/drjaredw...
1️⃣ The move is constitutional. They *can* invoke it.
2️⃣ The UCP is not *required* to do this. There are other means to pass the law.
3️⃣ They should not use it, in my view.🧵
1️⃣ The move is constitutional. They *can* invoke it.
2️⃣ The UCP is not *required* to do this. There are other means to pass the law.
3️⃣ They should not use it, in my view.🧵
I look at the role of libertarians in thwarting some of their most egregious acts of overreach.
open.substack.com/pub/drjaredw...
I look at the role of libertarians in thwarting some of their most egregious acts of overreach.
open.substack.com/pub/drjaredw...
www.notesfromthecircus.com/p/canadians-...
www.notesfromthecircus.com/p/canadians-...
The data is crap if it has no dates, small samples (<800), high margins of error.
The people showing them to you are trying to persuade you to vote for their own preferred party.
It's sales pitch, not an evidence-based argument.
The data is crap if it has no dates, small samples (<800), high margins of error.
The people showing them to you are trying to persuade you to vote for their own preferred party.
It's sales pitch, not an evidence-based argument.
newrepublic.com/article/1884...
newrepublic.com/article/1884...