Edward Swaine
@edswaine.bsky.social
8.2K followers 820 following 180 posts
Law professor. Personal account, personal views only. Vonnegut's one rule: you've got to be kind.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
edswaine.bsky.social
Vancouver just came downstairs and told everyone to knock it off and go to bed
edswaine.bsky.social
they just called up a lefty from the minors
edswaine.bsky.social
are managers allowed to pitch or nah
edswaine.bsky.social
petition to call Seattle relievers "Sub-Mariners"
edswaine.bsky.social
methinks Fast Times is overdue
edswaine.bsky.social
I feel in my bones we are already in the 500s
edswaine.bsky.social
agree, a blanket suffices
edswaine.bsky.social
From my POV, it is hard to see how the stated concerns (aside from perceived "unformity of thought") could be rationally focused on targeted schools, and the initiative seems like an attempt to parlay gripes about educational policy into coercive seriatim dealmaking aimed at political oversight.
edswaine.bsky.social
Presumably, all of them, along with tax exemption, etc. Existing financial support justifies any ask, so far as is apparent.
Reposted by Edward Swaine
edswaine.bsky.social
This defense of the compact, from one of its architects, makes clear that there's no limiting principle in the perceived problems or solution: the U.S. government (actually, DOJ) would like to operate for universities just like a new board of trustees. Goodbye, state, alumni, and private control.
excerpt from Marc Rowan editorial
edswaine.bsky.social
Pam, find out ASAP if these are non-transferable or if that's just a garbage excuse
edswaine.bsky.social
edswaine.bsky.social
observation: nudges and incentive effects remain (surprisingly!) underappreciated
edswaine.bsky.social
I thought, and still think, that President Obama's Nobel was ridiculously premature.

I thought, and still think, that the committee should announce that it will only *consider* awarding a president a prize *after* he or she had left office . . .
edswaine.bsky.social
What matters is what the *nominee* thinks . . .
edswaine.bsky.social
observation: nudges and incentive effects remain (surprisingly!) underappreciated
edswaine.bsky.social
I thought, and still think, that President Obama's Nobel was ridiculously premature.

I thought, and still think, that the committee should announce that it will only *consider* awarding a president a prize *after* he or she had left office . . .
edswaine.bsky.social
This defense of the compact, from one of its architects, makes clear that there's no limiting principle in the perceived problems or solution: the U.S. government (actually, DOJ) would like to operate for universities just like a new board of trustees. Goodbye, state, alumni, and private control.
excerpt from Marc Rowan editorial
edswaine.bsky.social
No one appreciates a briar patch anymore
edswaine.bsky.social
Probably need to introduce it gradually, wouldn't want lots of aspirants to resign all at once...
edswaine.bsky.social
Biden is technically eligible
edswaine.bsky.social
I thought, and still think, that President Obama's Nobel was ridiculously premature.

I thought, and still think, that the committee should announce that it will only *consider* awarding a president a prize *after* he or she had left office . . .
edswaine.bsky.social
Not sure but I can tell you they just ran out of nachos
edswaine.bsky.social
I thought, and still think, that President Obama's Nobel was ridiculously premature.

I thought, and still think, that the committee should announce that it will only *consider* awarding a president a prize *after* he or she had left office . . .
edswaine.bsky.social
Poor Kerkering. Sadly, there's no place like first.