banner
elmobronowski.bsky.social
@elmobronowski.bsky.social
John Brown Hoodie
February 14, 2026 at 1:01 AM
10th century was the craziest
February 13, 2026 at 7:04 AM
I hear you.

Billy Beane, Adam Lambert of Queen, and *sucks air through teeth* Usha Vance.
February 13, 2026 at 12:56 AM
Hasan in particular is "maybe he's better outside the tent pissing in" level nuts

He's the next Naomi Wolf.
February 13, 2026 at 12:44 AM
Thanks. I don't uniformly like your recommendations but it's an astonishingly high batting avg. Social media in an ideal world...
February 12, 2026 at 11:04 PM
Every so often I'm reminded that I would favor some level of polical literacy testing to vote if it didn't inevitably turn into a tool for racism & suppression.

"You want a vote on the NASA committee? Fine, first show us that you know the earth isn't flat and the moon isn't cheese."
February 12, 2026 at 11:01 PM
it's a piecemeal, one-sided, undeclared civil war
February 12, 2026 at 10:33 PM
I love having a Senate leader who can communicate so clearly about the reprehensible behavior of this administration
February 12, 2026 at 2:36 AM
Followup: might make the fundraising a little easier too
February 11, 2026 at 9:56 PM
Perfectly reasonable, though also unlikely to justify a lot of current stock valuations
February 11, 2026 at 8:02 PM
That’s how it’s supposed to work 😆

Countercyclical policy somehow always breaks peoples’ intuition
February 11, 2026 at 6:06 PM
c4 rice now!
February 11, 2026 at 3:42 AM
Like in a thousand years all the champion ski jumpers will basically be flying squirrels
February 11, 2026 at 12:35 AM
Was just going to say that the really funny infinite jest style outcome here would be if it turned out that all of these markets were set up by some anti-Bayesian extremist group.
February 10, 2026 at 11:17 PM
A good political leader has to simultaneously work toward results that are realistic, and communicate very clearly that *realistic* ain’t enough.

Schumer and Jeffries are not good political leaders.
February 10, 2026 at 1:25 PM
Did you ask whether they approved of your unwillingness to support impeachment hearings?
February 10, 2026 at 6:10 AM
Krugman diagnosed the problem 25 years ago with his comment on how news media covered the parties with the attitude that "opinions on the shape of the earth differ" and the media have comprehensively failed to address this.
February 10, 2026 at 4:47 AM
Because you can't be the most right about everything unless anything else people ever did was wrong
February 10, 2026 at 2:08 AM
yeah Stancil opens up a whole Taylor expansion of obnoxious
February 8, 2026 at 6:04 AM
Remember when the Supreme Court told us the President couldn't be criminally liable for anything because it would impede the ability of the gov't to function?

That was fun.
February 7, 2026 at 10:57 PM
Just for starters, it's impossible to imagine Trump paying this much attention to other humans for this length of time.
February 6, 2026 at 9:44 PM
Interesting thought. I would not have characterized Richard Powers as science fiction although he is certainly science-y fiction. And the discussion around LLMs the last couple of years has certainly brought back thoughts of Galatea 2.2!
February 6, 2026 at 5:48 PM
This is a more authentically Christian speech than anything Trump has ever said.
February 6, 2026 at 5:41 PM
To a great extent, the fact that standard press practices require treating politicians as though they speak in good faith has been turned into a cheat code for the party willing to lie their asses off.
February 5, 2026 at 10:49 PM
Here to represent the counterargument, Chuck Schumer
February 4, 2026 at 4:11 AM