πΉπ΄πΈπ§π»πΊπ«π―π¦πΊπ²π² (etc),
Mostly memes.
Sometimes post about #publicpolicy, research, data science, #PFM and #Rstats
Economist | Independent Consultant
All views my own
Please find attached the alpha version of my book "An Introduction to R for Policy Analysis":
policyanalysislab.com/shared/r-for...
Unfortunately, the draft has been released too late to be considered for a Nobel prize, but I look forward to being nominated in 2026.
...
You'll be lucky to find me wearing shoes.
You'll be lucky to find me wearing shoes.
The problem is that this can still be a profitable exercise for a firm able to extract a rent from lobbying in this way.
The problem is that this can still be a profitable exercise for a firm able to extract a rent from lobbying in this way.
jnchapman.com/assets/pdf/j...
jnchapman.com/assets/pdf/j...
The TLDR was that the RoL is a critical piece of institutional infrastructure for economic growth, development and the peaceful resolution of conflict.
...
The TLDR was that the RoL is a critical piece of institutional infrastructure for economic growth, development and the peaceful resolution of conflict.
...
I've actually really enjoyed Dostoevsky.
I remember reading Chomsky in the past and finding him needlessly verbose, like most academics.
This is why I'm letting myself skim or drop it if it feels like a slog.
I've actually really enjoyed Dostoevsky.
I remember reading Chomsky in the past and finding him needlessly verbose, like most academics.
This is why I'm letting myself skim or drop it if it feels like a slog.
*I've already started reading it and it seems like another one of those books that could have been a briefing or working paper. So I'm expecting that 'reading' will be selectivity skimming.
*I've already started reading it and it seems like another one of those books that could have been a briefing or working paper. So I'm expecting that 'reading' will be selectivity skimming.
It's garbage, but it's pretty solid garbage for 30 minutes of messing around.
It's garbage, but it's pretty solid garbage for 30 minutes of messing around.
I was just playing around with Gemini's agent.
No idea what I'm doing.
I was just playing around with Gemini's agent.
No idea what I'm doing.
open.spotify.com/episode/2R8q...
I like the point that the underground man is stuck in a loop of 'nihilistic apathy'.
This gels well with the point the book makes that consciousness is a disease.
π€
open.spotify.com/episode/2R8q...
I like the point that the underground man is stuck in a loop of 'nihilistic apathy'.
This gels well with the point the book makes that consciousness is a disease.
π€
π
π
And I think that the book makes a lot of subtle points about the human condition that benefit from further reflection.
π€
And I think that the book makes a lot of subtle points about the human condition that benefit from further reflection.
π€
One thing I will say about Dostoevsky, based on the books I've read, is that he can craft scenes that are both devastating and hilarious. I've frequently been floored by his writing, but have also laughed on several occasions.
ππΌ
One thing I will say about Dostoevsky, based on the books I've read, is that he can craft scenes that are both devastating and hilarious. I've frequently been floored by his writing, but have also laughed on several occasions.
ππΌ
I'm also not going to rate a book higher to reflect the author's notoriety. My ratings are based on how much I enjoyed the piece, not an attempt to signal my superior taste in literature.
π§
...
I'm also not going to rate a book higher to reflect the author's notoriety. My ratings are based on how much I enjoyed the piece, not an attempt to signal my superior taste in literature.
π§
...
I also think it was sufficient to emphasize the protagonist's (antagonist? π€) duality, while still being relatable.
...
I also think it was sufficient to emphasize the protagonist's (antagonist? π€) duality, while still being relatable.
...
βββ
(Out of five)
Now you might ask, who am I to rate Dostoevsky 3/5, to which I'd reply "the reader".
Book one was my main reason for rating this lower than his other books as it was (intentionally) cryptic, which made it a slog.
Book two on the other hand was excellent and...
βββ
(Out of five)
Now you might ask, who am I to rate Dostoevsky 3/5, to which I'd reply "the reader".
Book one was my main reason for rating this lower than his other books as it was (intentionally) cryptic, which made it a slog.
Book two on the other hand was excellent and...