Malcolm Tan
@ibdgastrodocsg.bsky.social
1.2K followers 800 following 220 posts
Gastroenterologist | IBD Service Director | Singapore General Hospital.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
ibdgastrodocsg.bsky.social
9/ Bottom line

IUS finds subclinical inflammation, drives earlier treatment, reduces invasive tests & emissions.

📄 Full study: doi.org/10.1080/0036...

@yiyuantan.bsky.social @justinleongwh.bsky.social @tandfresearch.bsky.social
https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2025.2533338
t.co
ibdgastrodocsg.bsky.social
8/ Limitations

Operator dependent
Limited for proximal small bowel / extramural complications
But as an alternative to endoscopy/MRE, it’s a game changer
ibdgastrodocsg.bsky.social
7/ Cost & planet wins 🌱

💰 USD $92,069 saved
🌍 2,752 kg CO₂e cut (≈ driving 14,000 km less)
IUS isn’t just good medicine – it’s good climate action
ibdgastrodocsg.bsky.social
6/ Impact on care

27% → treatment escalation
Discordant IUS findings → higher escalation (p=0.017)
60% avoided colonoscopy or MRE after IUS
That’s big for patients and endoscopy waitlists
ibdgastrodocsg.bsky.social
5/ Our findings 😲

63% in clinical remission…
But only 32% in transmural remission on IUS
➡️ Almost HALF of “well” patients still had active disease
ibdgastrodocsg.bsky.social
4/ Our prospective study

48 patients, 60 IUS assessments:
- CD: 57%
- UC: 43%
Compared clinical, biochemical & IUS findings
Tracked changes in management + avoided procedures (MRE/Colonoscopy)
ibdgastrodocsg.bsky.social
3/ Why this matters:

Colonoscopy & MRE are gold standards but…
❌ Costly
❌ Long wait times
❌ Sedation/bowel prep
❌ CO₂e emissions up to 55 kg/procedure
ibdgastrodocsg.bsky.social
2/ What is IUS?

No prep 🛑
No radiation ☢️
Point-of-care, takes minutes ⏱️
Sees transmural inflammation, not just mucosa
Minimal carbon footprint ♻️
ibdgastrodocsg.bsky.social
How intestinal ultrasound (IUS) changes IBD care – clinical impact, cost savings & greener healthcare

1/ #IBD is rising fast in SE Asia 📈
We need tools that are accurate, patient-friendly, and sustainable.
Our SGH pilot study shows #IntestinalUltrasound ticks all 3 boxes ✅
ibdgastrodocsg.bsky.social
For gastroenterologists and IBD clinicians, TL1A blockade may represent the next chapter in mechanism-based IBD treatment.

@lancetgastrohep.bsky.social @robbrierley.bsky.social
#GISky #IBDSky #MedSky
ibdgastrodocsg.bsky.social
Takeaway:

Tulisokibart appears safe and potentially efficacious in CD patients with high prior biologic exposure.
Early signals of both anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic activity suggest a dual mechanism worth watching.

A phase 3 trial is underway. 🧪
ibdgastrodocsg.bsky.social
Biomarker & histology insights:

- ↓ hsCRP & fecal calprotectin by Week 6
- ↓ Th1, Th17 cytokines (IL-17A, IL-22, IL-9)
- ↓ fibrotic gene expression (e.g., COL1A1, MMP3)
- Histologic remission (RHI <3) in 18%
ibdgastrodocsg.bsky.social
Safety:

- AEs: 78% (mostly mild-moderate)
- SAEs: 15% (none drug-related)
- No deaths, no infusion reactions
- Most common AE: infection (45%), incl. COVID-19 (11%)
ibdgastrodocsg.bsky.social
Primary efficacy results (Week 12):

- Endoscopic response (≥50% ↓ in SES-CD): 26.0%
vs historical placebo 12% (p=0.0023)
- Clinical remission (CDAI <150): 49.1%
vs historical placebo 16% (p<0.0001)
ibdgastrodocsg.bsky.social
Trial design (N=55):

- Multicentre, open-label
- Moderate-to-severe CD
- IV tulisokibart: 1000 mg (Day 1), 500 mg (Weeks 2, 6, 10)
- Endoscopic response at Week 12 = primary endpoint
71% had prior biologic exposure; 35% had ≥3 agents
ibdgastrodocsg.bsky.social
Why TL1A?

TL1A (TNFSF15) is a key driver of Th1/Th17-mediated inflammation and intestinal fibrosis—two critical components of CD pathogenesis.
Tulisokibart blocks TL1A from binding to its receptor DR3, dampening both inflammation and fibrotic signaling.
ibdgastrodocsg.bsky.social
APOLLO-CD

A phase 2a induction trial of tulisokibart, an anti-TL1A monoclonal antibody, shows promising efficacy & safety in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease (CD) refractory to prior therapies.

Key findings from the APOLLO-CD study:
[🔗https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(25)00071-8]
ibdgastrodocsg.bsky.social
9/ Collaborate.
Oncologists + gastroenterologists should jointly manage ICI-colitis.
Steroid-sparing strategies are essential to keep patients on life-saving immunotherapy.

#GISky #OncoSky #MedSky
ibdgastrodocsg.bsky.social
8/ Clinical takeaways for MDTs:

Don’t delay colonoscopy: endoscopic/histologic phenotyping matters.

- Consider early biologics for IBD-like or steroid-refractory cases.
- Faecal calprotectin is your friend.
ibdgastrodocsg.bsky.social
7/ Poor prognosis:

- CD-like pattern → worse outcomes (HR 3.84)
- Microscopic colitis → better prognosis
- Total 12-mo mortality: 32%
-- Only 4 deaths were colitis-related
-- Majority due to cancer progression
ibdgastrodocsg.bsky.social
6/ 12-month remission rate:

- Any clinical remission: 37%
- Steroid-free remission: only 16%
- 66% were still on therapy at 12 months.
🛑 ICI was stopped in 80% due to colitis — but discontinuation did NOT impact remission (P=0.48).
ibdgastrodocsg.bsky.social
5/ Treatment snapshot:

- 1st-line: Systemic steroids (68%), oral budesonide, anti-diarrhoeals
- 2nd-line: Infliximab, vedolizumab
- Biologics were underused, colectomy was rare but real (1%).
ibdgastrodocsg.bsky.social
4/ Faecal calprotectin was significantly elevated in nearly all cases (median ~765 μg/g).
CRP? Mildly elevated.
➡️ Don’t underestimate colitis just because systemic markers look ‘okay’.